Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default Notice


Johnnyc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have today received a default notice dated 14th May 2007. It states:"to remedy the breach you mst pay**** by 14th May 2007."

 

It is now 19th May. so how can I possibly pay by 14th May?

 

My question is obviously :can this be right or do they have to give 14 days notice to enable time to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately it's less than that. Although the lender may allow more than seven days, the legal requirement is that the default notice must allow you at least seven days to comply with the action required and the lender can start court action for recovery of the money after complying with the requirement to send a default notice.

 

You do not have to make a payment within seven days, but you should contact them without delay with your proposal.

 

Although, from what you have written above, you do not appear to have been given any time at all! Write back to them and ask for an explanation, if nothing else, it will buy you another week or so while they reply.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

was increased to 14 days on the 1 Octobor 2006 under the new CCA 2006

 

1 October 2006 (CCD)

Extension of period for consumers to respond to default notices, from 7 to 14 days (section 14(1))

 

14 Default notices

(1) In subsections (2) and (3) of section 88 of the 1974 Act (contents and effect of default notice) for “seven” wherever occurring substitute “14”.

(2) In subsection (4) of that section after “it” insert “and any other prescribed matters relating to the agreement”.

(3) After that subsection insert—

“(4A) The default notice must also include a copy of the current default information sheet under section 86A.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have today received a default notice dated 14th May 2007. It states:"to remedy the breach you mst pay**** by 14th May 2007."

 

It is now 19th May. so how can I possibly pay by 14th May?

 

My question is obviously :can this be right or do they have to give 14 days notice to enable time to pay?

 

 

Yep. The default notice is invalid. If they were then to terminate your contract and report it to the Credit Reference Agencies etc they would be liable for damages.

 

Have you CCA'd and S.A.R.'ed them yet?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have today received a default notice dated 14th May 2007. It states:"to remedy the breach you mst pay**** by 14th May 2007."

 

It is now 19th May. so how can I possibly pay by 14th May?

 

My question is obviously :can this be right or do they have to give 14 days notice to enable time to pay?

 

I found this

 

Removal of Default & Termination Notices - Accurate Default Notices are vital

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...