Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New boy. Has anyone claimed above the £5000 limit?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, my first foray and message! I'm helping a friend who has a business (sole trader) and who has put in a claim for c£7500 all through one account ie above the small claims threshold. Hence, claim cannot (I assume) be split into separate claims for lesser amounts.

 

Accept court action/defence unlikely but A&L will undoubdetdly try it on with any refund limited to £5k knowing this, can anyone offer any advice/guidance please? Any offers of help gratefully received, I suspect this will prove tricky given A&Ls track record from your forum!

 

The initial letter sent was using the moneysavingexpert template, hadn't found you then! The 14 day limit has expired without response, so could do with a quick reply if poss! Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks sea-sidelady, I did have a peruse of this info but given that the initial claim for c£7500 has already gone in, it seems we can only follow up with the 14 day red threatener at this stage.

 

Also, looking at the £5k limit messages,whilst it sems there are advantages splitting, the moderator states clearly that the advice for the site is not to split it. Given it's well over £5k, will this automatically preclude SCC involvement, even tho' at the judge's discretion? My friend will be alarmed at the potential court charges, even tho' it's unlikely A&L will appear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just bear in mind that if it's only the interest component that puts it over £5k, then it can still go small claims.

 

IMHO you need to have a very good and justifiable reason for splitting claims, and if it is well over the limit you may have to bite the bullet. However, there does seem to be a few cases of larger claims being schedule to the SCC as some judges do seem to realise that although the amount is larger, the principles remain the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ladybird, we haven't included interest at this stage given the size of the initial sum! Presumably if successful, the judge will add this anyway? The original letter via moneysavingexpert gave the option of interest/no interest letters, so went for the latter to avoid over-egging things.

 

Your second point makes sense, this is my gut feel too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ladybird, confirmation useful. I'm still familiarising myself with all the Q&As etc but if A&L back out pre court, can we stick in a retro claim for the interest in the vague expectation that they'll cough up? Could generate a further action all of it's own I guess!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, I think you should have claimed the contractual interest from day one - and as far as the 8% (statutory) interest goes that is at the discretion of the court - so A & L would have no obligation to pay this. If you went for the interest after a settlement I would think the courts would consider you a vexatious litigant and throw it out.

 

That's what I THINK - but it's not necessarilly correct!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, sorry for the delay. I think as the claim was pretty chunky already, my friend didn't want to push her luck or the figure too far above the £5k limit, although clearly it's totally admissable.

 

I take your comments on board! Be interesting to follow the Lloyds "victory" to see what happens, although CGA's views today are that an appeal will win the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...