Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MollieUK v Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6126 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I got my statements etc and sent the first letter and received the usual 'it will take 8 week' as a reply.

 

I then got the information I needed from this wonderful site and sent the Letter Before Action one to them by registered mail and on Friday received a reply stating that 'they are still working on my complaint but as yet it is not resolved but it will be no later than 13 June'

 

Another 4 weeks!!!

 

Now should I wait or start court claim?

 

I have had a right tussle with them last week as my maintenance is always paid in on the 6th of a month but sometimes a day or two out if the 6th falls at a weekend. Last weeks bank holiday threw everything out as it always does and which I have no control over but the d**n bank did not pay a DD of £23 on the Tuesday because ''THEY'' hadn't cleared my maintenance into my account because of the BH!! aarrgh

 

Of course they charged me £39 and when I phoned them to ask for it to be removed they would not. Worse thing is that they intend to take the money on Monday 15/5 when I only have £18 going in which is Child Benefit, daft as it may sound but that £18 keeps me going until Thursday when I receive my WFTC (my wages only cover bills so I live on WFTC). I told them all this and was virtually begging them not to take it as it would leave me with nothing. Not a chance! Not only that but by taking it they make me overdrawn.

 

I then lost my rag and stated that I would be making my court claim this week and their behaviour this week would be told to the court and I put the phone down.

 

Later when I had calmed down I decided to phone again to at least get the date changed when they would take the money and to ask for it to be left until the end of the month when my wages are paid.

 

I had a lovely young lady on the phone who listened and then just said 'I've taken it off, probably shouldn't have, but I have, and besides it is pointless charging you as you will claim it back anyway'

 

I would love to name this young lady but I don't want to get her in trouble, but thank you so much. It is ridiculous that in 2007 people are still living hand to mouth but that is the way it is for some of us, however, this young lady made me realise that there are still some decent people around.

 

:) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been there done that, they totally ignored it!

 

I also phoned the Child Benefit Agency and as the money was already in the system ready to be paid into my account on the Monday, I was told there was nothing they could do, in fact, the 'lady' I spoke couldn't care less!

 

Still as the Halifax has one decent member of staff who was prepared to help even putting her own job on the line, I can only be thankful for that.

 

I had to laugh tonight whilst watching the TV and the newest Halifax ad came on, I watched it and wondered how much money has that piece of naff c**p cost us???

 

Cheers for the words of wisdom anyway. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Today I have received a rejection letter for my charges from the Halifax. In short it states that my charges are for having insufficient funds in my account at times of payment, I might add that not all of this was down to me as I am tied to when payments are made from work, CSA, Tax Credit etc once a bank holiday comes along it messes it all up.

 

I have online internet banking since inception so I never received any letters through the post, everything is online. They quote guidelines on credit card default charges and state that this does not apply to bank account charges and they are perfectly within their rights.

 

Have I lost out on this? Has anyone else had this and what did you do next?

 

Advice appreciated please :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Moneyhelp

 

Yes, the LBA was my second letter to them, this was their reply which must be a standard response as some of the reasons given quoted things that were not on my letter to them??

 

OK will start the next stage now, cheers for that. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Made my claim to the court and received their notice today. Judgement served on 29 June and they have to respond by 13 July, it has been a long winded process but without the guys/girls on here, it wouldn't have happened.

 

Fingers crossed everyone! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have received a letter from the court today to inform me that Halifax are to defend and have 28 days to prepare their defence.

 

Has this happened to everyone who has submitted a court claim or will I now have to go to court or is this just their way of delaying things??

 

The other thing that puzzles me is why they pay out for some and not to others??

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Sea SideLady for the info. The papers were deemed served on 29 June so maybe it is getting a little closer as the time will be up by end of July I think.

 

To be quite honest it is about time the courts started slapping fines on the banks as they virtually have no intention of defending the claims and pay out, just how much wasted administration and court's time are they wasting, it really is wrong and just cluttering up the system.

 

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

Today received a settlement letter which reads as though they are doing me a favour?

 

However, I phoned the number (it worked!) and spoke to a very nice gentleman and stated that I would not be accepting the amount offered as it would be silly of them to admit part but not all of the charges levied by them.

 

He stated that he couldn't find all the information for the last 6 years and would I be so kind as to send 'him' the statements I had received from 'them' so that he could check again!! I politely pointed out that the statements I received from 'them' were on his computer system!

 

He did try other methods like 'well you may have moved banks and come back again', 'you may have more than one account' etc, again I stated that 'No sir, I have been with your bank for at least 15 years with the same branch'.

 

Needless to say that I ended the conversation with my non agreement of the settlement and looked forward to hearing from them before the 28 July.

 

Light at the end of the tunnel at last thanks to this forum and the people on it. Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advice please.

 

I have looked into my account today and they have deposited the amount they decided even though I phoned yesterday stating that I am refusing that amount. What should I do now??

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

No it was two cash deposits but they added up to the amount stated in the letter. I have posted my rejection letter this evening stating the same as on the telephone to them yesterday. If the amount had been much nearer I probably would have settled but it is some £800 short! He gave the reason as " he couldn't find all the charges I listed so his calculation was based on the ones he did find". I said he should use the same computer system as the one that printed off the 6 years statements :)

 

It is sooooo annoying having money in my account that I can't touch!! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No the amount put into my bank account is the same settlement amount they have offered me not the amount they owe me. Hope that makes it a bit clearer.

 

:)

 

Hi again, have double checked all my statements and the amount I am claiming is correct, in fact between March 2000 and February 2001 they had charged me over £600!! :)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I got another letter today from Optima Legal Services who are working on the Halifax's behalf, it was a copy of their defence.

 

However, the amount they say were credited to me are different to the letter from the halifax and from the cash amount put in my account.

 

The letter ends with 'the claimant is put to strict proof of the same', meaning the rest of the money that I am claiming.

 

I have all my statements from them from March 2000 to March 2007, they supplied them, are they really that stupid??

 

I am wondering whether they are trying to pull a fast one here and state that the six years only counts from 2001 to 2007 as that is when I staked my claim. From March 2000 to February 2001 they charged me in excess of £600, this is the bulk of the claim. My claim would be that until 00:01 on 31 December, 2007 is the present not the past.

 

Any advice O wise ones! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sea-side Lady

 

After your post last night I got the statements out and checked and double checked just to make sure and my calculations are correct and in black & white on the statements. In 2000 alone they took £600+

 

The letter from solicitors states:

 

"refunded £699.14 to the account for charges to the account in the last six years"

(the halifax man yesterday stated that he couldn't find any?)

£394 are charges

97.27 in interest

£120 is court fee

£87.87 is an additional amount in respect of the ongoing interest?? the letter also states that the claimant has failed to provide particulars of how this figure was arrived at, I attached an excel spreadsheet with month, day and charge, taken from their/my statements.

 

The Halifax letter stated a refund (without admitting liability?) of £611.82, that is exactly what has been deposited into my account.

 

I am happy to go to court as I have the statements in my hand, how can they refute them?

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

POC?? Sorry

 

I sent my original by recorded and it was received for and signed for but I will do as you advise and resend again by recorded.

 

Thanks for your help, I need to do this all quickly as I started chemo today and at the moment just under the weather but no doubt will get worse!

 

:) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I was organising my statements last night and have noticed something odd. The statements are mine but the sort code has 00 at the beginning which mine hasn't? Do you think this is why they are claiming that they can't find the charges. I am really confused as the 190 pages of statements have all got this sort code on, right up to the present year??

 

I have never had another account, nor change branches, banks etc

 

;)

 

p.s. thanks for the kind words about the chemo. Feeling a bit strange since the first 'shot' but just out of sorts nothing specific or drastic just yet x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I was right in my thinking about the Halifax using the 6 year rule. I have just spoken to the guy and they are only counting back from the claim date in June 2007 which takes it back to 2001. The bulk of charges occurred between March 2000 and February 2001, can they do this and have I lost out?

 

Should I now accept or go ahead with the claim or will the courts go with the Halifax, it is over £600 in charges for that year alone.

 

Any help appreciated.

 

:)

 

p.s. they only use the last four digits of the sort code btw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Moneyhelp but I have read the first 15 pages of the link you gave and am now totally confused with legal jargon and this and that and everyone's questions and didn't read through the rest.

 

I was sent my bank statements that date back from March 2000, the bank is stating 'it doesn't have that information' and they are working out the figures for the last six years as requested by me.

 

I want to take this further as they are trying to con me and even if I lose I want to get them worried as they will have to attend court.

 

Could someone please tell me in plain english, no jargon, no acrynyms my next move. I have the questionnaire from the court to fill in and from what I have read (possibly understood?) I can add in previous years and have the s32(?) squashed???

 

I haven't a b***dy clue what I have just said but does it sound right??

 

I know I sound a numpty and I am sure you are all sick of saying the same old thing over and over again but help please! :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SSL

 

I have read through the 'completing the questionnaire', did that earlier on and it seems to cover the basic 'filling in', a straightforward one.

 

This seems to apply to me:

 

Q. Can I claim back for more than 6 years?

 

A. Maybe. There is a separate thread on this in this forum. The statue of limitations states that you can only go back 6 years. However, it also states that if you have had the truth held from you resulting in your not making a claim earlier, that you can claim from the date that you became aware. If you are unsure, you should only claim for 6 years.

This is where I am getting confused. I read the first 15 pages of the link given regarding going back more than 6 years but got even more confused. Now using the wording above i.e. "...... if you have had etc...... you can claim from the date that you became aware ......."

I only became aware of this from my first LBA letter which would be in May 2007, they have calculated the last six years from June 2007. I know it says in the FAQs that you are sick of answering the same thing over and over again but some of us just don't understand the system, so as it looks like I am not able to deal with this I will just take the money and let them have the other £800+ and as they say, they will literally be laughing all the way to the bank!

Thanks anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I was getting a bit techy last night and very tired, blame the chemo. However, I requested my statements over the phone and if I remember rightly only requested the last six years, I actually got from March 2000 to April 2007.

 

I sent a letter on 4 April which asked for a repayment of all charges over the last 6 years. I then sent a 2nd letter on 3 May (template) and have had the usual responses. I then put in my court claim.

 

Have I made a complete b***s of this?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dursay, I have never felt so flippin tired in my entire life! I am trying to keep working and it is my sixth day after first treatment and boy is it kicking in, still life in the old dog yet!! ;)

 

Hopefully last couple of questions. Do I accept this offer and have it closed and begin new claim? Or do I start new claim before accepting this one, or (last question) do I put the two together? I think I remember reading somewhere on here that you have to agree full and final etc and your not allowed to claim again. I just want to make sure I am doing the right thing and I can stop bothering people!

 

I have until the 6th August to return my allocation quesionnaire and the solicitor's for the Halifax have sent me their copy today which simply states they intend to defind etc.

 

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...