Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AlphaGeeK Vs Amex ***WON***


Alphageek
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5294 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, long time lurker on here and have been reading everything my (now square shaped) eyes could take in over the past couple of weeks.

 

I think I know what to do to get the ball rolling, but am going to post here for 2 reasons.

 

First, so you people who are further along and more experienced than I can (if you're feeling helpful) keep me on the right track should I start to veer off in the wrong direction.

 

Secondly (and more importantly), to try and keep this thread as informative as possible so any other people who have suffered at the hands of the illegal actions of the parasitical financial institutions will feel that they are empowered to claim back their rights (and money, interest and possible damages).

 

Some of the stories you read on here are nothing short of scandalous. The lengths the lending institutions, banks, debt collection agencies and bailiffs go to is unbelievable.

 

Fortunately, it seems we have good laws in this country and it seems fairly straightforward to get them off your backs and to refund any unlawful charges they have taken.

 

My 1st tip for any lurkers reading this is to get started as soon as you find yourself having issues with any lenders or want to claim back your money. Giving the lenders any more time to harass you only benefits them.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So, on to my situation.

 

I got behind on my Amex account payments and they defaulted me.

 

Note to lurkers (and self): I could have quite easily prevented this default being registered. See my tip no. 1 above.

 

Debt sold to or is now being handled by Debt Collection Agents (acronym DCA) Newman and Company of Leeds.

 

I can see the default on my credit report via CreditExpert (http://www.creditexpert.co.uk). It shows as the following;

 

The account is defaulted. You have failed to keep to your credit agreement and have not responded satisfactorily to requests to put your account in order. As a result the credit agreement has ended.

The most annoying phone calls from Newman's and interminable letters followed.

 

I agreed a payment plan and have pretty much adhered to it.

 

The balance when I first hit problems was around 10K. My latest Amex statement shows I owe around 1.5k.

 

So I now wish to claim back the unlawful charges.

 

I am going to issue a S.AR. (Subject Access Request) letter and a CCA (Consumer Credit Act) letter to Amex.

 

The SAR will compel them to produce all data they hold about me and the CCA will be asking them to produce a true copy of the executed credit agreement.

 

The data I will receive under the SAR will enable me to work out how much illegally obtained money of mine they have and if they cannot produce the true copy of the executed credit agreement, the agreement is invalid and no debts are enforceable.

 

Will post more later.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, had to go to pick my Girl-friend's dog up from the Vets.

 

Anyway, back to business.

 

The format of these letters, or templates can be found on this site.

 

The SAR is here.

 

and the CCA is here - Letter N

 

(Note: IF you're new here, you will need to sign up and be logged in to see the text of those templates)

 

 

My latest Amex statement is ~1.5k, yet the latest letter from Newmans says I owe ~3.5k. I guess they're looking for a healthy profit.

 

My first question then is; Should I SAR and CCA the DCA as well as Amex so I have the full picture.

 

The reason I ask about the sense in SAR and CCAing the DCA is that I don't think there has ever been a Deed of Assignment from Amex to Newmans and they are just "acting on behalf of..."

 

Their letters always say something like "...instructions from our client to proceed further..."

 

I am of the mind to SAR and CCA both parties, wait until their 12 days are up (for the CCA) and if/when they fail to produce change my payment instalments to £5.00 (as a gesture of good will (GOGW)) while I proceed with claiming back the illegal charges.

 

All suggestions welcomed.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can't hurt to CCA the DCA - I think we proabaly have a duty to hastle these people - it helps them understand what its like to be on the other side of the fence. I don't think sendin them a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) will produce anything unless you think they may be applying unlawful charges too. I suspect that Newman have not bought the debt so there will be no deed of assignment - from Newman's website:

 

"With 20 years experience in the Debt Recovery sector, Newman and Company Ltd is an expanding business that provides debt collection services to clients throughout the UK. Set-Up in 1986, the business is located in Leeds.

 

Newman and Company specialises in the collection of overdue accounts for a variety of clients, both large and small, across a wide range of industries including large blue chip companies, utilities and major banks both in the UK and overseas.

 

The service operates on a no collection, no fee basis and can be tailored to meet any unique client requirements"

 

Basically, they do the banks' dirty work and get paid when they collect. No collection, no fee probabbly sharpens the mind and makes them rather unpleasant. I note they also have "investors in people" certification. That's their people not 'real' people of course.

 

Steven

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven,

 

Thanks for popping by.

 

I was thinking of sending a SAR to the DCA so I have lots of ammunition about their calls & letters when I eventually warn them off for possible harrasment.

 

Would they not log all calls and mail in a database and thus have to disclose?

 

Anyway, I think £10.00 worth of annoyance will = :D for me.

 

I guess you're right though. I guess I can't tell then to stop contact until in dispute, so anything previous will be irrelevant?

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should keep records of phone calls - specifically mention that oh your SAR or they will just send statements, assuming that is what you want.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA and SAR sent to Amex and Newman this morning via recorded delivery. They will be deemed to have received it on 17/05/2007.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Royal Mail site shows the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and CCA delivered to Amex today (under separate cover).

 

Interestingly, the same things sent to Newmans in Leeds has not been delivered yet. I guess they'll show up tomorrow.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a reply from Amex today. It consisted of the following;

  • A compliments slip with "Free of charge. Regards, Illegible Sig"
  • The £1 PO I sent as fee for the CCA request
  • 2 copies of 13 pages headed "GOLD CREDIT CARD AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974"
  • A photocopy of what looks like 2 application forms

Here is the photocopy. Blurring applied by me and some text added to show what I have removed.

 

Image Scan Here

 

Clearly, this is not a true copy of the executed agreement.

 

Question: Should I write thanking them for the enclosed but reminding them that I asked for a true copy of the executed agreement and the application form they sent me cannot be assumed to be it.

 

Should remind them of the original time scale (from when they first received my original request) and should I send them the PO back?

 

I thought I had seen a nice template letter for this somewhere, but can't find it

 

Thanks.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I should add that I have not read the 2 13 page documents yet, but they seem to be the same thing on 1st glance.

 

Neither of them have any dates on nor any handwritten notes.

 

They both have what I take to be the word processing document reference in the header or footer (CAM 4520 - 301 -d64-wp-18.01.06) and probably supposed to be the terms at the time of opening the account and the present terms.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, the small print on the app form, above, you can read as well as I can. i.e., it's pretty illegible!

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should just write and remind them of their obligations (including timescales) under the CCA and that what they have sent is not adequate. By all means send them the £1 back - after all that is your obligation under the CCA

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A package arrived this morning via recorded delivery. It is the response to my SAR.

 

The package consisted of the following;

 

  • Cover letter dated 17.5.07, stating "Dear Alpahageek, Please find enclosed copies of statements detailing all charges as requested. Should you have any further queries regarding the statements please do not hessitate to contact us in writing. Yours sincerely," - pp signed for a Data Protection Co-ordinator.
  • My £10 cheque
  • Copies of my statements. The earliest being dated in Jan 2001.The latest being this month's

There is no notation regarding any manual intervention, nor is there a statement that there is no such notation due to the lack of any such manual intervention. My SAR letter specifically asked for this.

 

Are Amex obliged to supply statements from the time of account opening in 1997 and not just for the last 6 years? If they are, and they have levied unlawful penalty charges am I able to reclaim them?

 

I am also surprised there are no details of the transferring of the account to the DCA, I was expecting copy letters, default notices (if any), Deed of Assignment (if any).

 

Also, there surely must be more information held on this account (discounting the DCA saga) that they have failed to supply, or have I really been just a number to them afterall?

 

As per the CCA request, should I write back (enclosing the original cheque) and request the missing information?

 

I suppose I should get on with completing a spredsheet. Which is the best to use for Amex?

 

Thanks.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alphageek

 

There is no notation regarding any manual intervention, nor is there a statement that there is no such notation due to the lack of any such manual intervention. My S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter specifically asked for this.

 

Then you should write and remind them - use the Data Protection Act non-complaince letter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

Are Amex obliged to supply statements from the time of account opening in 1997 and not just for the last 6 years? If they are, and they have levied unlawful penalty charges am I able to reclaim them?

 

THey should supply everything they have about you and that includes all statements back to whenever. Put it in your letter. Yes you can recalim them - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/80486-claiming-beyond-6-yrs.html?highlight=6+years

 

I am also surprised there are no details of the transferring of the account to the DCA, I was expecting copy letters, default notices (if any), Deed of Assignment (if any).

 

These should be supplied - put it in your letter

 

Also, there surely must be more information held on this account (discounting the DCA saga) that they have failed to supply, or have I really been just a number to them afterall?

 

You would think so and, if there is, it should be supplied - put that in the letter too

 

As per the CCA request, should I write back (enclosing the original cheque) and request the missing information?

 

I think so - see above

 

I suppose I should get on with completing a spredsheet. Which is the best to use for Amex?

 

I personally think Mindzai's is the easiest to use - see bottom of first post on http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/26172-mindzai-lucid-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In response to the agreement form being sent for my CCA request.

 

My Address

Place

Place

P/Code

 

Date

 

Person

Data Protection Co-ordinator

American Express Services Europe Limited

Data protection Office

Department 2007

Amex House

Edward Street

Brighton

BN88 1AH

 

 

Dear Person,

 

Re: − Account Number 0000 000000 00000

 

Thank you for your letter postmarked 17.05.07 and the enclosure of a copy of my original application form together with what I presume to be a copy of the terms and conditions applicable to the account at opening and those applicable today.

 

My original letter (copy enclosed) requested that you send me a true copy of the executed credit agreement. Your above mentioned letter did not have this enclosed. I ask you to correct this omission and provide me with said true copy.

 

The application form does not represent a true copy of an executed agreement having various prescribed terms missing and is, in parts, illegible.

 

I ask you to be mindful of the wording of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79) and remind you that my original letter is deemed to have been received by yourselves on the 17.05.07 and that you should comply with my properly formatted request within 12 working days.

 

I re-enclose £1.00, in the form of a postal order, which represents the fee payable under the act for this request.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

 

Alphageek.

 

 

 

Enc: Copy letter dated Monday, 15 May 2007

Postal Oder serial number 000000 00 0000 00000000

Via Royal Mail Recorded 1st Class – DL 0000 0000 0GB

Any comments before I send?

 

Thanks.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think Mindzai's is the easiest to use - see bottom of first post on http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/26172-mindzai-lucid-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Hi, thanks for the pointers.

 

Mindzai's spreadsheet states that it should not be used for credit cards on the Notes tab. Do you know why?

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the pointers.

 

Mindzai's spreadsheet states that it should not be used for credit cards on the Notes tab. Do you know why?

 

No I don't know why. If you put the APR on page 1 with the other data and your charges on page 2 (ignore the interest stuff on page 2) then the interest calculation on page 4 is right. Paghe 3 is s69 interest which you should also ignore (for now).

 

Steven

 

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter re incomplete disclosure under S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

 

 

Address

Address

Address

Address

Postcode

 

Date

Person

Data Protection Co-ordinator

American Express Services Europe Limited

Data protection Office

Department 2007

Amex House

Edward Street

Brighton

BN88 1AH

 

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

 

 

Dear Person,

Re: − Account Number 0000 000000 00000

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated Monday, 15 May 2007 (copy enclosed). The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

  1. You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges dated between account opening in DATE and DATE
  2. The screen dump in lieu of MONTHS’s statement is not annotated and is, therefore, meaningless to me.
  3. You have provided no notes, or documents relating to instances of manual intervention.
  4. You have provided no notes, or documents relating to a default entered by your company against my credit reference agency file on or around DATE. Particularly statutory default notices.
  5. You have provided no notes, or documents relating the transfer of the account to DCA on or around DATE. Particularly a deed of assignment.

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

You have a further thirty six days to comply, or I will seek an order in the County Court under the Data Protection Act.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Alphageek.

 

 

 

Enc: Copy letter dated Monday, 15 May 2007

Personal cheque number 000000

Via Royal Mail Recorded 1st Class – DL 0000 0000 0GB

Any comments?

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't even receive a copy of my application - they only sent me a set of their latest terms and conditions.............kept my £1.00 postal order though!......................So I'll be sending a similar letter to you on Monday ......only question is is it better to delay informing them that they haven't supplied what we requested and that subsequently they are in breach and that we are not as dim as they think we are so that they breach the 30 day limit as well and commit a criminal breach? They've already paid out in full on my penalty charges and interest - I'm CCA'ing them to try and stop them giving my personal data to the CRA's.

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

...only question is is it better to delay informing them that they haven't supplied what we requested and that subsequently they are in breach and that we are not as dim as they think we are so that they breach the 30 day limit as well and commit a criminal breach?

 

I don't think you should do that. Our strength is that we behave reasonably and do things properly. Don't descend to their level. In any case, you want this all sorted as quickly as possible, don't you.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...