Findings so far

[Seahorse]

Aktive, with your obvious talent for obfuscation and befuddlement, perhaps you should consider a career in the debt collection industry yourself. You appear to be doing a better job of it than old WW himself.

[Seahorse]

OK, I've finally had enough. It is my BELIEF that make them aktiv runners is DELIBERATELY disseminating contradictory and inaccurate theory and misinformation. The reasons for which I am not clear.

 

It MAY be that Aktiv truly believes that his point of view is correct. But he seems to be in a minority of 1.

 

However, the only other explanation i can think of at the moment is, Aktiv has a hidden agenda.

 

Now, I wouldn't normally come right out and condemn posts where the points of view expressed are totally at odds with each other, as I do believe in a healthy debate.

 

But where one poster is writing comments and assertions that are so at odds with actual research, findings and personal experience gleaned by other posters, then there IS no debate, and is simply gainsaying whatever each person posts. Dress it up how you like, what it boils down to is a playground argument of "yes it is", "no it isn't", "yes it is"... ad nauseum.

 

Worse, I believe that anyone trying to make sense of the whole Cabot/Debt Purchasing issue will be so perplexed at the so-called logic of Aktiv and his meanderings, will be so put off from reading any other posts on the same subject, that they won't feel able to tackle the issue as it relates to them.

 

I'm not advocating censorship... But I AM asking anyone reading this to consider my comments, and ask yourself why one member seems so hell bent on contradicting everyone else. Of course, he might be right, and we're all wrong. So please consider that too.

 

Apologies if this comes across as a personal attack on you Aktiv. But in my own humble opinion, your ideas at best are confusing, and at worst are dangerous and misleading.

[Seahorse]

You just wouldn't let it lie.

[Seahorse]

FG did say most are bought not all. But that is not my point. It does not matter what anyone believes it is the discrepancies I am looking at. For example, your above case was sold back whereas many that are unexecuted have not been, in both cases people including yourself have been fiercely corresponding, does it seem strange that Cabot seem to be operating 2 different procedures? As you all claim to have a low opinion of Cabot and how underhand they may be, is it not logical to tell them exactly what is missing just to cover your own back?

 

[Seahorse]