Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HELP - Prelim approach


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The 6 years you can go back - is it....

 

a) Six years from today? i.e. Back to April 2001

b) Six years from when my first S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) was sent, or..

c) Six years from when my account was closed?

 

 

Who does the prelim approach letter go to - the same person who provided your SAR statements (Joyce E Tudor) or a different dept.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There doesn't seem to be a 6 year limit any more. Effective arguments using section 32 of the ~Limitation Act are negating this old defence.

 

See this - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/80486-claiming-beyond-6-yrs.html#post712882

 

But should you wish an easier ride to refund ( i.e. not contentious in any way) then the 6 years should, technically and arguably, begin at the time you raised the issue - if you used the CAG template SAR then this mentions it and so it should be 6 years from then.

 

Otherwise it ought to be from the date of your prelim letter, when you first asked for it back.

 

In my own case, the RBoS solicitors have taken 6 years from the date the claim was filed - I will be pointing out their error if we get to a hearing...

 

But as the thread above highlights - that's all irrelevant and you should go far back as you possibly can.

 

I would send your prelim to your branch. Otherwise it's customer relations and they seem to be working to an 8 week timetable. So keep it local as long as you can.

 

It doesn't matter if the account is closed, the branch is local to you and that will be the address for service in the event of a claim.

 

Worst that can happen is that they bounce it up to CR....

 

But stick to your timetables, don't be dissuaded by 'we will reply within 8 weeks'.

Prelim Day 1

LBA + 14 Days

Claim +14 Days

 

Please click my scales if this has helped - Cheers

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Sorry to interrupt, but what is your avatar??!!? It is so stange and I can't enlarge it.

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a bloke with his head up his own a*se....quite a fashionable position these days.

 

 

On an aside...

 

This is split from OP's main thread...could somebody patch it back in please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Ahhh yes. I can see it now.

Sorry about that Danny, I didn't mean to hyjack your thread, but it looked so weird I had to ask.

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - it's gone! I've just posted my Prelim approach letter recorded delivery to my local branch manager as you suggested.

 

I've also included all charges that are shown in my statement - they do just go over the 6 year stage so lets see what they've got to say about that!

 

14 days and counting!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Have a read through these,

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/rbs-bos-successes/

they will give you hope that there will be a positive outcome, and any problems you encounter will probably already be in there ao you can see how to deal with it,

 

It's a pity the chatroom is still closed as that place can really help with any doubts and fears you have.

Also good for just unwinding and having fun.

Still hopefully it won't be long.

 

It's basically a waiting game, seeing who can out stare the other - don't be the one to look away.

Many people do at this stage and give up.

 

Make sure you stick with the winners and you will be one!

 

 

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...