Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning,  I have recieved a reply from my request for information. They have replied with the credit agreements for my 118 loan and two Captial One cards.  They have said thay as Vodafone is a telecommunications account it is not regulated so the original creditor is not obliged to provide a copy of the agreement.  What are my next steps?  Thank you 
    • Treasury rubbishes Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax hike election TV debate claim   I see Sunak and his crew have been shown to be liars at the first outing, including lying about what senior civil servants have said (all on top of Sunak trying to deflect some their own DEFINED budget black hole onto labour) No surprises there then Treasury rubbishes Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax hike election TV debate claim WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK In a humiliating moment in the election for the prime minister, a scathing letter from top Treasury officials revealed that the figures...  
    • Three Trump allies charged in Wisconsin fake elector scheme   "Last year, the 10 fake electors from Wisconsin disavowed their attempt to overturn Trump’s defeat in 2020, recognized the legitimacy of President Joe Biden’s victory, and pledged not to serve as real electors in 2024 or any election when Trump is on the ballot – or to act as sham electors in any future election, as part of a civil lawsuit settlement. The 10 fake electors issued a statement acknowledging that the phony certificates they signed in December 2020 were “used as part of an attempt to improperly overturn” the lawful election results."   Three Trump allies charged in Wisconsin fake elector scheme | CNN Politics EDITION.CNN.COM The Wisconsin attorney general on Tuesday filed charges against three allies of Donald Trump accused of taking part in the effort to...  
    • Thanks all. Think I have come to a plan dx please correct me if I am getting you wrong but I am going to go down the route you suggest. simply stop payments for now until I receive a DN and it gets marked on my file. Then contact each lender and start making token payments to each one. i then assume most like they will then at some point sell to DCA. Once they are sold I’ll be coming back to see how best I deal with it.  Let me know if I am making some error in judgment or missing anything with my plan 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2 lots of Abbey charges to claim - advice please!


campino
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6250 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a current Abbey account with approx £800 worth of charges + interest to claim back.

 

I also have a closed account with approx £500 worth of charges + interest to claim. This old account ran from 1990-1999 but i kept all my statements so i have proof.

 

Do i make these claims indivudally or group them together? I am ready to go to the online court phase so want to make sure I get it right!

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Hello,

 

If you are ready for the court stage, then what have your initial approaches to Abbey asked for?

 

If you have only asked for one set of charges, then you can only put on set of charges on the court paperwork.

 

Have you considered the N1 for, instead of MCOL, if the older charges are being claimed, N1 may be better, as you can put more info in them. Just my opinion, but something else to consider

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for your email

I have been in correspondence over the last few months with Abbey regarding my current account, with them predicatably stalling etc. I have copies of all the bank charges though so I am ready to go to the court stage with this.

 

I also have all the details of the bank charges on my closed account (1990-1999) as I kept all my statements.

 

So I just need to know whether I should combine them and treat it as one claim (I have all the details I need), or whether there is a reason I should treat them seperately (The current account charges are within 6 years, the close account run as far back as 1990)

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

You need to give some info as to exactly what you have already asked for from Abbey.

 

Have you sent anything that resembles an initial approach

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=30&Itemid=78

 

 

and then anything like an LBA

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=78

 

 

If so, then your court paperwork has to relate to the figures previously asked for.

 

If you havn't sent anything like the above 2 letters, then you need to start with an initial approach.

 

Now to the question of what to claim. The 'over 6 years' issue has only recently been discussed, and I have not fully researched it. You need to have a godd look here. Yes, you will be advised, but its your claim, and you must be comfortable with what your doing, so its a case of research you claim. I will try to find the link to that thread.

 

Personally, My initial feeling is that I would treat them as 2 seperate claims, although that is being said without knowing the full details, and I wouldn't claim for both at the same time.

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

the short answer is yes you can claim them all in one go, but read up on the stuff Louis suggested first :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...