Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • By not sticking to the deadline which you set you have lost credibility. Your letter of claim becomes one of hundreds of others which they receive and which they put in the bin because they think that you are just bluffing.  
    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

me vs city


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6222 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly hello to you all.

 

I am also located in Scotland

 

I have sent off my dpa letter to citi. The 40 days expire tommorow. As yeti have recieved no statements but had to send off ID which i have now done. The reason they said they needed the id was so they could specifically sent me details of manual intervention on the account. I must admit that hearing all the stories initially put me off but as i read more and more the bully tacticts now just make me even more determined to fight.

 

Some questions

 

If the claim is above 750 should i still use the small claims route and split the amount so that should they win they can only claim £75 court costs or should i go down the summary cause route (no limiton to fees though that can be awarded).

 

Secondly what is the point of them taking these cases all the way to court anyway. Citi if you are reading this it must surely be costing you more to pay Brian (and then pay out) than it would to just pay out in the first place. Nice to know somebody is milking you though. Instead of the other way around.

 

Finally does anybody know if i get a hearing date but then cannot make that day in court is it possible to have the date moved.

 

Cheers all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read a few threads is there any way that a breakdown of actual costs request could be incorporated in the LBA letter. Im sure this would look better with the courts when citi obviously fail to respond. Would this also not help in requesting full disclosure at the court stage?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are filing in Scotland then the costs both for small claims and summary clause is only £ 39.00 regardless of the amount being filed. The court charges are not charged until the papers are handed to the court and on section 4 you state " The pursuer claims from the defender the sum of xxxxx with interest at the rste of 8% annually from the date of service together with the expenses (this is where the court charges are added) of bringing this action" ALL in asll it is quite easy except CITI are not the easiest to deal with so you do not letn them off with anything.;) CITI if you are reading this pay attention how unpopular you are becoming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was meaning damages that could be awarded. If they can?. This is a point where i am confused i.e. if citi won then could they not claim legal fees for solicitor etc. (if they can its max 75 for small claims, unlimited on summary cause). That is the only concern for me at the moment. Well that and trying to get disclosure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a general rule, court expenses are awarded to the

person who succeeds in the case. These expenses

must then be paid by the unsuccessful party.

Expenses are normally calculated at the end of the

case by the sheriff clerk, who then has his calculation

approved by the sheriff.

Expenses which you may incur include:

The cost of any solicitor, if you choose to employ one

Loss of wages and travelling expenses for yourself

and any witnesses you may require to bring to court

The cost of having any order made by the court

 

 

I understand the cost of bringing the action is £39. But are you saying that a claim for expenses for the above (costs) would also be limited to £39. (what solicitor could be had for £39 nowadays)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi RNSM

 

I think texel is getting confused, as you say, between the cost of bringing a case (£39) and your potential liability to defendant's legal costs should you lose.

 

You are right in what you say as regards limited protection in small claims but could be liable to full legal expenses if you lose in summary cause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Account is clear and closed. I say its closed as i asked them to do it and dont get statements anymore but if i phone my account number brings up the account and shows about 6p in credit. It has been this way for about 6 months. They do confirm its closed though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Duncan disordly I apologise I was wrong I spoke to the sheriff court this am and the the charges for a summary case if you lose is generally £ 134.00 sorry for my error Hope I will be forgiven:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow thats not as daunting as i thought i was expecting the opposition to claim

 

solicitors fees - name the price

Travelling costs - usually fixed rate

 

etc etc

 

Feel a lot better now cheers to you both

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...