Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Halifax credit card.......Mis-sold ppi???????


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6266 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

My mum took out a credit card in July 2001 and named my dad as second user(he has kidney failure and has since 19999in nov 06 she got made redundant and tried to claim off her ppi to pay her credit card. they have eventually got back to her and saisd that she cant claim because they have been in touch with the family G.P and my dad had a pre-existing illness when she got the card and ppi. Is this right? Can they do this? I believe it is upto the seller of the ppi to check the history? Why does it make a difference when my dad is only the second user?????????Any advice will be gratefully recieved. THANX

xxx zara xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

My mum took out a credit card in July 2001 and named my dad as second user(he has kidney failure and has since 19999in nov 06 she got made redundant and tried to claim off her ppi to pay her credit card. they have eventually got back to her and saisd that she cant claim because they have been in touch with the family G.P and my dad had a pre-existing illness when she got the card and ppi. Is this right? Can they do this? I believe it is upto the seller of the ppi to check the history? Why does it make a difference when my dad is only the second user?????????Any advice will be gratefully recieved. THANX

 

Hello,

 

Its really good ppi they take your money and then tell you what you have paid for it actually useless to you.Please read this

PPI - Some Notes for Claimants..

 

PPI Claims

 

This is standard practice of these companies. How would they manage to give the fat cats at the top their premium:lol:

 

Did you give them permission to speak to your Doctor:eek: or did your gp just have to fill a form out.

 

The ppi sold was not fit for the purpose it was sold.

 

Do you have all the statement of payments of ppi that was taken from you. If not send a subject access request to them for the statements and make sure they send the original credit agreement as well. You will be amazed at what you receive if anything.

 

If you have the statement send a prelim letter requesting refund of all ppi payments. and of course cancel it.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have got no statements, rang them today and they said it £5 per statement for the 1st 5 then £5 per bundle of 5 and she has had the card about 6 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!

xxx zara xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them to shove that - the most they can charge is £10!

 

I'm also not happy with my Halifax credit card as looking back over statements, I was at times paying £80 or more per month for a policy which, you guessed it, never paid out when I was unemployed! I was in permanent employment when I took out the PPI, but within a few years was made redundant or on short-term work which rendered the policy effectively useless. I haven't added up the total PPI I've paid in the past 5 years to them, but it does appear to be thousands.

 

:(

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have got no statements, rang them today and they said it £5 per statement for the 1st 5 then £5 per bundle of 5 and she has had the card about 6 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

They tell you porkies to put you off. :eek: £5 a statement, my botty:eek: Reclaiming back the ppi, is the same as the bank charges process,

 

1. get your info

 

2. prelim asking for it back

 

3. again asking for it back

 

4. Fos or court.

 

Start with your Subject Access Request. It cost £10 for all information

 

1. Data Protection Act, Subject Access Request letter - List of charges

 

I would IMO start the ball rolling it do give you great satisfaction:D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its Good to Complain and to be seen as a pain in the Ass to the Companies...;):p

 

They really do need sorting out, They have got away with sort of practises for far too long, Hopefully now the Issues of PPI are becomming more and more in the Public Eye too.

 

Im still waiting patiently here for my court date against GE, the sooner it comes the sooner the next lot of issues of PPI and Tacticts the companies use can hit the National Press..;)

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...