Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, in the main your understanding of my case is right. Linked below to the post with the final WS sent to the court and to Evri.   
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. As you say, appealing this ticket doesn't help as these people hardly ever accept appeals. They don't care how difficult someone's life is, they just want the money. The forum guys should be along later with thoughts for you on how to deal with this. Best, HB
    • I have received an email in the last 10 minutes 4) The Claimant's witness is currently out of the office on annual leave and this was not relayed to DWF Law until after the event which has caused a further unfortunate delay. 5) The Court has directed parties to file and serve any evidence upon which they intend to rely not later than 14- days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 6 June 2024. Regrettably, the Claimant will have insufficient time to finalise their witness evidence and supporting exhibits as directed. We therefore respectfully apply to extend the time for filing/serving evidence so that the evidence upon which the parties intend to rely by filed and served not later than 7-days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 13 June 2024  It also includes a "Notice of Hearing" stating that the application hearing will take place on 13th June at 10.00am.  Confused as to whether I need to attend this ?
    • I've received this notice to keeper. I work for the NHS and was delayed due to patient care. I park here regular and and have never had any issues. I've looked at the evidence on the portal and other than showing that i entered at 12.59.33 and departed at 17:14:14 it doesn't state how long i overstayed for. I paid for 4 hours parking over the phone which i wont have done till i got parked but as its over the phone i have no receipt or record but it is not possible for me to have been in excess of 15mins from the photos alone but I'm unsure having read other threads whether grace periods are 10 or 15 minutes. I havent appealed yet but and was about to but in appealing i'm showing i'm the driver which i gather is something you state we must never do. I don't like confrontation but £60 seems extortionate. Hope you can help. 🤞 1 Date of the infringement 30th May 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 30th May 2024 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s 3 Date received 5th June 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No reference to schedule 4 just says"...we the creditor reserve the right to recover unpaid parking charges from the registered keeper in accordance with POFA 2012." 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up NA 7 Who is the parking company? Carpark securities 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Northgate, Halifax Former Dews Car Park HX1 1XJ For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   Notice to Keeper.pdf
    • It never seems to amaze me how the chuckleheads think that No Stopping can ever offer a contract when it is prohibitory. In any case you did not accept the contract by entering the land, you entered the land to get to the airport for goodness sake. In most car parks there is a Consideration period that allows motorists to decide whether they want to stay in the car park . Here on a road, there is no consideration period and whether the motorist finds the terms agreeable or not even assuming that they are able to understand that they are being hoodwinked into believing they are being offered a  contract they cannot turn back. They have a plane to catch and even if they did turn back because they didn't accept the  No Stopping term of   the so called contract they would still have had to stop to turn around. Plus there is a question of Frustration of Contract. You had to stop at a pedestrian crossing .    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC Managed Loans


lou7603
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i'm not a fan of these loans in fact - even reading the words managed loan brings on a red mist - i'll post a couple of threads but to be truthful - i can't read them anymore as i get so upset i just can't read them at all.

hsbc have a lot to answer for.

 

but in answer to your question - i don't know where i read it - but i did read an explanation on this forum about the managed loans and it seems that they are set up in the same way as a mortgage - in that in the early days of the loan you are paying almost all interest and very little against the principle of the loan and as time goes by it equals out (again just like a repayment mortgage does) to where by the last few months you will be paying only a small amount of interest and a much bigger portion of the loan itself. i hope that answers your question. it doesn't make it any better - but at least you have an understanding of it. i don't think for one minute that people understand what they are signing up for when they take them on - it is - by what i've read - presented to you as your one and only hope of salvation - with little option but to sign up for it.

now, if you are a real glutton for punishment - take a look at a few of these stories:

Who has had Managed Loans? (multipage.gif1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page)

 

managed loan, hsbc, 66% interest now i see that this is the one where roosterrs explains the idea i tried to explain above.

 

hsbc managed loan charges

and many, many more - just put managed loans in the blue strip line above - that starts on the left with user cp.... move across to search - put it in and click and it comes up with 30 of the most recent references to m.l.

 

and my personal favourite for all time stinker award to hsbc: read post number 24 on this thread: Husband v HSBC - Paid

it beggars belief!

 

which brings me to one happy story - that was someone replying on Tigs33's thread "husband v hsbc - paid". actually tigs33 is the only claim i know of where the managed loan was tied into the reclaiming of bank charges and you know what - the whole loan was repaid!!!!!!! so, read that thread and see if it could work for you.

a lot of peeps are talking about trying to get something back (like the interest - if you can show that it was the unlawful charges which made you overdrawn and needing to take out this gruesome loan in the first place) so, read up - good luck. we will help if we can.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

lou, in answer to your question - take a look at an exchange i had with bong a few months ago (she is one very clever lady)

i wrote this:

Re: Bong v HSBC *Contractual Interest & 13yr claim*

bong dear, mother lat. here. boy, did i have to go back aways to find this thread - not a peep since last fri!

anyway, i digress, on petey boy's thread (hurrah for the offer) you said this: "have you considered reclaiming the interest on the managed loan? If it was money borrowed to repay unlawful bank charges then you would be entitled to the interest back on that part of the loan. Another claim maybe?"

now, dear, talk me through this nice and slowly. son has a managed loan brought on by going continually over his overdraft and the good people at hsbc talked him into this solution. (i didn't know any of this until we started talking about the reclaiming on the current acct - still not told me much - but i'd like to talk to him with some confidence) are you saying that the whole interest on the m.l. is recoverable? what if, i'm guessing here, they said "oh, take out a loan for xxxxx amount as that will cover your overdraft plus a little extra for yourself". then would it still be recoverable (if it is), also, what if you are only part way through paying it off, is it recoverable for the interest paid to date - what about the remainder? remember you are talking to an almost oap, technophobe who has never been overdrawn (don't take that wrong - i bleed for all of you who have fallen into the traps - "there but for the grace of god....etc") anywho, post away and inform me - you know i trust you implicitely! thankx in advance.

 

and go here to find the answer and our exchange which may clear up your question.............Bong v HSBC *Contractual Interest & 13yr claim**WON!!!** (multipage.gif1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page) page 6 posts 100 - about 106.

see if that clears it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...