Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Chunky Linc Vs. HSBC


chunkylinc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4715 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if you are going to do the o/d interest - try looking at this thread - post 26 - i wrote this for someone and she and many others have conquered overdraft interest using it.

:honeygie v HSBC *****WON***** (multipage.gif1 2 post 26.

 

as an example - my son's charges were 1500, o/d interest added 300 and the 8% interest which everyone can add at the claim stage added another 300 - so in his case it was certainly worth the hour it took us to sort it.

my advice - try the thread - do the advanced and see if it is worth it.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 weeks later...

it's normal not to have heard anything. just file the claim

 

try: claimant has held an account with the bank since before xxxx or

claimant has held an account with bank for several years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After You Have Issued Your Claim

Your POC's state that you will be supplying a schedule of charges, but MCOL does not allow you to attach it to your claim at the time of filing.

So, once you have filed your claim, you need to send 2 copies of your schedule of charges, clearly marked with your claim no. + a brief covering letter asking for them to be filed with your claim to:

 

 

Quote:

The Court Manager,

Money Claim Online

Northampton County Court

21-27 St. Katharine's Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

(Your Name) –v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a schedule of penalty charges taken from me by the defendant, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £(AMOUNT).

 

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached to the particulars of my claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

Wait until you receive the Notice of Acknowledgement (not the Notice of Issue) from the court and then send a copy to the bank’s solicitors, since they are the ones who will now be dealing with your claim. Their name and address will be on page 2.

 

 

Quote:

Dear Sir,

 

(Your Name) -v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my schedule of charges relating to the above claim.

 

(If, and only if, you are claiming overdraft interest on your penalties, also include this paragraph)

 

 

I understand you have a policy of initially rejecting claims for overdraft interest. However, should this be the case after you have reviewed my claim, you should be aware that my claim for overdraft interest has been meticulously calculated and double checked. It only ever relates to the cumulative charges within the overdrawn balance of the account at the point that the overdraft interest was debited

 

If it is that in your view the interest is not claimable, I am prepared to discuss this with yourseves and the judge in court.

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

and take a look at the last few postings on this oneMaangov V HSBC ***WON*** - it's very recent - he had to climb down on the contractual interest - but held on for the o/d interest - his was one of those they tried to pull apart - so look at how he wrote back - i think (not sure) if you address the issues a little - like pete's above on the 6 yr and like man. on the o/d intere. and then hang tough - you may pull it around - don't let them smell fear. crusher would say if you've done your claim correctly - no reason to settle for anything less than a full offer - they will come through with one (although i do know of a couple a few months back where they went back and forth and back and forth and eventually the claimant took the offer - but it's way too early for that) they don't usually pick them apart - just stand firm - and put a little back up into the letter. and yes, tell them (assuming they are) that the charges only fall outside of the six years because of their dilatory (i love that word) dealing towards your approach for information.

 

 

i think they pick yours up early because of the judgment thing -

ring the court to see when you will hear about court directions - and mention whatever you find out - in your letter to dg -

 

for now - stick to your guns - answer their letter with the points above and don't let them smell fear - they used to do this a lot - now they don't as they don't usually pick up your claim until near a court date - they got yours out early and are trying to needle you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

dust it off a little - we were playing with another paragraph as to why it shouldn't even be considered for a stay - because that is the banks playing with the court - read through from those posts 331-340

Link to post
Share on other sites

there's mention in the oft press release of all claims being stayed until the outcome of the test case - but we are hoping that claims close to resolution will carry on to conclusion - we are crossing fingers, eyes, and everything else. i'll look for the lincoln thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

got to go listen to radio fivelive at 10 pm - something about bank charges,,,,,,,,

i'm thinking about this -

i know crusher would say hold out for the lot - (crusher is on holiday, drat!) let me get back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they do this - and frankly - i get a bit spooked too at this point - but if you are sure you've done it correctly - then hold out -

would it be worth a compromise offer at this point - would you be ha ppy with what they have offered and half of what you want over that -

 

you could play them at their own game - you are confident, blah,blah,

 

but to save everyone further time and money you would be willing to split the difference with them and lay it out how much. that's if you'd be happy with that.

 

not to be a downer but we have had one or two where they argue and argue and in the end you just have to give in or it looks like it will never finish. you have to weigh it up - and with all this oft stuff going on - i'd be tempted to ask for - politely but using their lingo (confident, assertive) that you'd settle for a 50/50 split on the difference - what do you think ----- please if no one else comes on to say - feel free to pm castlebest or one of the site helpers to get another view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, i've asked for help for you in two places so it should be forthcoming - but in absence of those with more about them - i'd say at the very least - you take letter number two from this thread:Application for removal of a stay - UPDATED TO ACCOUNT FOR OFT TEST CASE

 

or the one from this link:~~## Stays info and guidance ##~~

whichever one you like better.

 

plus from this thread:GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

see what garyh says to take to a prelim. and take it.

:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

if they haven't complied then they are again in violation of the court directions and i'd be letting the court know double quick - like applying for a judgment? come on guys, let's think this through - what can he do - they've failed to follow court directions - can the stay be set aside because of this? - - this is complicated, cl, i know it's a struggle - but let's see if we can't get an opinion of this before you take the latest offer - btw - don't sign it if it says you'll never, ever be able to claim from them again - they have done this before and that puts you in a bad position in my opinion.

 

SO, BUMPTY, BUMP - LET'S GET SOME OPINIONS HERE.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...