Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5780 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I'd like to put a question to the forum on behalf of a good friend, whom I'm trying to persuade to claim her bank charges back.

She has an IVA arrangement through the debt counselling service.

What do people think or know about trying to start this process whilst an IVA is in place?

My feeling is it shouldn't make any difference as it would go towards repaying the existing debt.

But she's extremely worried and wouldn't want anything to jeopardise her situation. Feedback would be much appreciated.

Barclays Bank

13/9/06 - ACCEPTED HALF ON BOTH A/Cs

HSBC

21/10/06 - SETTLED IN FULL

Preferred Mortgages

11/8/06 - prelim let sent - redemption fee

12/07 - case dropped

Halifax B/S

2/07 settled in full

Halifax visa card

MCOL due

Citicards & Hillesden

2/07 Data Protection Act & CCA let sent

3/07 Prelim let sent

4/07 LBA sent

Barclaycard

04/07 offer received for 1/3 - refused

Argos Card services

Half offered - refused

PPI Claims:

8/12 MBNA Loan settled in full

7/12 Barclayloan settled in full

9/12 Liverpool Victoria settled in full

7/12 Barclaycard claim rejected

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

It really depends where they are in the IVA...beginning, middle or end! I am at the beginning of mine, however am selling my house to pay off as full and final settlement. Then going for the banks. I did ask the question in one of my threads and got conflicting replies. One reply I private message I got may help you...

 

I read in one of your posts that you had an IVA and were trying to claim back money. Can you please let me know if you managed to do this or where you are with it? Yes you can !! Your IVA is made up of money that you oew your creditors, in this case your creditors owe YOU money from there unlawful charges.. I have claimed from the Halifax £1916 which they settled out of court.. Halifax are one of the 'Main' creditors in relation to my IVA.. they didnt argue or question it, in fact they sent payment to my IVA supervisor so it comes off the overall debt.. There is nothing more pleasing than the HALIFAX paying off my debts for me :grin:

 

Reason I ask is I am trying to do a similar thing, but have been told on my thread (type in responsible lending) that I have acknowledged the debts Legally via the IVA therefore people do not think I can go the CCA route to say the debts were illegal in the first place... Who ever told you this is talking nonsense... It wouldnt suprise me if they work for an IVA company!! On the contrary i am also in the process of claiming from the Nationwide, Capital One Credit Card and 3 x Halifax Credit cards... Cap 1 and Nationwide are not involved in my IVA and so they will pay back the money to me and not IVA..

 

It would be really helpful to know what you have done and where you got with it, You have nothing to lose and everything to gain.. the money you are asking to be returned to you is rightfully yours..

 

Feel free to ask for assistance when you need to, and go back to that thread where they say you cant claim and put them straight..

 

 

Hope this helps,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some information in here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/69385-ivas-where-you-stand.html

 

 

Hi,

 

 

Reason I ask is I am trying to do a similar thing, but have been told on my thread (type in responsible lending) that I have acknowledged the debts Legally via the IVA therefore people do not think I can go the CCA route to say the debts were illegal in the first place... Who ever told you this is talking nonsense... It wouldnt suprise me if they work for an IVA company!! On the contrary i am also in the process of claiming from the Nationwide, Capital One Credit Card and 3 x Halifax Credit cards... Cap 1 and Nationwide are not involved in my IVA and so they will pay back the money to me and not IVA..

 

Feel free to ask for assistance when you need to, and go back to that thread where they say you cant claim and put them straight..

 

 

Hope this helps,

 

Penfold

 

A CCA request is totlayy different to claiming abck charges. The absence of a CCA does not make the debt illegal - it just makes it unenforceable, however in this case the debts had been included in a formal legal agreement the consequences of breaking this agreeemnt are bankruptcy. At no point on the thread you refer to were you told not to claim charges because you were in a IVA.

I most certainly do not work for an IVA company.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gizmo,

 

The post was not an attack on you! Merely stating there are grey areas here and it appears anything is possible. If Greedy Bank says I owe £3000, but most of this is made up of illegal charges then why should the other creditors in my IVA not benefit? Or if the IVA is settled myself to benefit? In my case I will be only persuing the creditors to remove credit file info, but I do believe (maybe foolishly) that if I really went for them some would give in and return unfair charges...

 

That is a debate for another day anyway,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

mmm... i'm still none the wiser, but if it means the possibility of bankruptcy, then I know she won't go ahead.

Then again.... can a 'bankrupt' pursue charges?

Thanks guys & gals.

Barclays Bank

13/9/06 - ACCEPTED HALF ON BOTH A/Cs

HSBC

21/10/06 - SETTLED IN FULL

Preferred Mortgages

11/8/06 - prelim let sent - redemption fee

12/07 - case dropped

Halifax B/S

2/07 settled in full

Halifax visa card

MCOL due

Citicards & Hillesden

2/07 Data Protection Act & CCA let sent

3/07 Prelim let sent

4/07 LBA sent

Barclaycard

04/07 offer received for 1/3 - refused

Argos Card services

Half offered - refused

PPI Claims:

8/12 MBNA Loan settled in full

7/12 Barclayloan settled in full

9/12 Liverpool Victoria settled in full

7/12 Barclaycard claim rejected

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw this site on the recent Channel 4 programme on Barclays.

 

I have just written to Lloyds re bank charges for the past 5 years. I was only mildly concerned this might have an impact on the IVA which started in October after 5 months of hell.

 

I wrote over a week ago to my local branch ad dont have a reply!

 

This thread has been useful.

 

I see the banks are advertising heavily on TV at the moment.....if only they advertised what happens when they decide they don't like you anymore.

 

I was a triple a rated customer until they agreed a huge loan for my self employed wife, (more than she needed and including a 4k employment insurance and the loan was conditional on taking this, verbal condition!). 12 months later they decided to draw a line under more lending to us having doubled their liabaility with us the previous year!

 

A customer of some 23 years became persona non grata.

 

I will never forget the arrogant and patronising remark made by the local branch manager when I called to ask why they would not agree a further roll up of the overdraft..."well to be blunt we don't want this kind of custom....."

 

Would like to tell more. Is there an existing thread?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are so many issues here that are easily confused - we really should get a "I am bankrupt / in an IVA, what is the situation with regards to asking claiming back bank charges / asking creditors to prove their debts" faq together!

 

I'll volunteer to do the bankruptcy bit and most of the IVA bit!

 

The very highly abridged version is:

 

The charges were first levied after the IVA proposal was agreed but are claimed back during it's currency;

This is unlikey to happen as opportunities to incurr charges during an IVA should be limited. If it does it's a windfall. You'll need to look at what your agreement says about these, but a likely version is that you'll have to tell the IP and he'll probably ask for at least half.

 

If the charges were first taken before the IVA proposal was agreed but are claimed back during it's currency;

Any money claimed back will go in this order:

 

> To reduce the claim of the creditor that made them (They shouldn't have been claiming as much so they have to reduce their claim to what it actually was)

> If there is anything left over after that creditors claim has been reduced to zero, for distribution to other creditors in proportion to debt

> If there is anything left over after all creditors have been paid in full; to reduce the amount you have to pay into the IVA

> If there is anything left after that, to your friend's good self.

 

However, the highly abridged version of other matters to consider:

 

> It's a bit dubious who has the right to claim pre proposal charges. At the very least you'd need the nod from the IP; technically it's very much his job, but with what his fees would be he might not want to

 

> Even if it doesn't reduce what you have to pay into the IVA, you might still want to do it in case of any unforseen thing that crops up. For example, if you got an inheritance or lottery win during the course of the IVA you wouldn't want it to be going to pay off the charges.

 

> Every day you wait a bit more of it becomes time-barred. If you wait 5 years and then something happens that makes a claim worthwhile, there won't be much of a claim left.

 

My thought would be for your friend to get the information from the creditors and find out what the situation is first of all. An easy way out could be to write to the IP saying "The charges are £XXXX, they need to reduce their claims by £XXXX, and try and persaude him to get them to agree to it. You don't have much leverage to force them to do this unless there is some point to it; for example that one creditor's claim consists of a disproportionate amount of the unlawful charges.

 

 

There has been a case posted here where one creditor's charges were so many times in excess of their claim that the gentleman's truly wonderful wife (that I still admire for standing by him when so many unfortunately don't) managed to claim back (with the IPs approval) an amount that lead to a serious change in the position of the IVA. I would say your friend should get the figures and find out what the position is to see if it's worthwhile.

 

With regards to the entirely separate matter of sending a CCA letter to see if the debt is enforceable, once you have entered into an IVA it's way too late. You've acknowledged the debt and the IVA is very enforceable (by bankruptcy).

Number of times I've asked 1st Credit for information that I stil haven't recieved... 55 as at 02/05/07 :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I had an IVA which was settled at 27p in the £ .It was a full and final IVA which was settled within a year. As the IVA has now been concluded, if I ask for a refund on bank and credit card charges, will they be paid to myself or can they say they will keep the money owed to offset the 73p in the £ not paid.

 

As in an IVA all money must be shared equal to the debt percentage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

2 of the creditors included in my IVA have said they will pay.

Barclays have credited my bank account(not included)with £324. This was the amount that I was charged by.

Lloyds have said that they will send I cheque £355. This is including interest (not asked for)

HFC are not playing ball. I have sent this account to FOS.

FOS have said you can claim after an IVA.

Lets wait and see.

Others to claim for still.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi longleigh a bankrupt can pursue unlawfull cahrges but any money he/she will get out of it will go towards his/her estate and as such he/she will see very little of that money as a BR anything you had pre-BR is transfer to the Official Receiver and as such it is not belonging to you !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...