Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Credit AGREEMENT -or- APPLICATION? RBS Advantage Card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Laiste - to be honest it was a copy of the latest T&C's hence the reason why it looks like they have covered all bases. If I find an older one I will have a look at what that said. Not surprisingly none of my creditors have sent me a copy of the original T&C's yet!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 650
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My understanding was that the second copy should be sent to you after it is signed by the creditor and your 5 days runs from the date you receive the second copy.

 

If the creditor didn't send out the 2nd copy as in your example, the agreement is fatally flawed and so is unenforceable. I always ask for evidence of when the copies were sent out for that reason.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow Zim, I understood the earlier post but not sure if I understand this one! Have you had a look at the OFT guidelines on cancellable agreements. That's where I got my comments from. Link here in case you haven't seen it

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft018.pdf

 

Page 24. Now I look at it again they have 7 days to send a copy except where executed on customer signing (then a separate notice of cancellation must be sent within 7 days)

 

If the document you describe is photocopied and sent, wouldn't that suffice as a second copy?

 

PS thanks for the click. Hope I haven't undone anything with this posting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant a photocopy as a second copy to be sent at the time the agreement starts and it should be sent within 7 days of the creditor signing it.

 

I have said to a few of my creditors that I shall require evidence of the issue of the 2nd copy or the cancellation notice. If that's what you mean then I agree with you and I think you are on the right lines. Ask for the evidence of issue, after all they will need to prove to the courts they have done so if they try to enforce the alleged 'agreement' won't they?

 

I have my two glasses of wine head on too, so perhaps we need to look at this again tomorrow (assuming the kids allow me to use my computer!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dirtyharry - you have not quite interpreted the law right. The creditor should send the 2nd copy or cancellation form within 7 days (of signing I think). The debtor has 5 days FROM RECEIPT to cancel. I appreciate proving the date of receipt may be difficult if it is received more than the usual 2 days after posting allowed for by the courts but even so there is a very short time span when an agreement can be cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

You have left your personal details in the application pdf. It's a good idea to balank those out (don't know how to do it, sorry!)

 

If the copy is illegible then you cannot conclude the original was legible so Section 61 failing first of all. Secondly an application form is not an agreement. Peterbard has produced some excellent info on this and it is all in this thread. It will take a lot of finding as the thread is so long but it is probably the only way to find out what you need to know. There is a 'search this thread' button towards the top of the forum page (just below the page count) which allows you to search. Look for posts by Peterbard. Peter is very knowledgeable but his typing isn't his best skill so you have to stick with it when reading his posts.

 

When you have got to grips with it try opening a new thread for your own case and if no one spots it and answers any questions, post a link to it here.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...