Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Successfully sued Comet?


Summerhill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6206 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone successfully sued Comet for repair of an appliance? My fridge freezer (advertised as £899.99) has broken after 30 months.Obviously, I expected it to last a lot longer. They want £60 to send someone to assess the fault. If it is a major one they will reduce the cost of the parts by 20% but will not pay for the labour. It's compounded by the fact that this appliance was advertised as money saving! Shouldn't goods be expected to last a reasonable amount of time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Yes it should - ive seen somewhere on here that osmebody put up a rough idea of cost = reasonable time = type of usuage (ie moving parts etc etc).

 

Just a thought though have you contacted TS to see what they have said?

:-x Kennsignton Mortage Company

:-x GE Captial

:-x Welcome Car Finance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Consumer Direct are normally the first port of call now for consumer advice, most TS don't now do "first line" advice since CD started their service. Their number is 08454 04 05 06.

 

Bear in mind that they - or Trading Standards, for that matter - won't be able to tell you whether it's wear and tear or a fault as they are not experts in how the goods actually work :)

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It never hurts to give Consumer Direct a call. Even if the advice you get is similar to what you already know, your complaint will be recorded and statistics provided to Trading Standards so TS know who are the most "complained about" businesses, in case they need to advise or educate - or even take action against, in some cases - certain businesses.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest retailpointofview

ok i remember SOGA saying without costs to the buyer. (hmmm)

 

sellers can charge a callout fee but if proven as fault from purchase, they HAVE TO waive the costs or reimburse them.

 

if however its due to wear and tear. then they dont have to reimburse you. just do a 100% check make sure there are no dents, loose wires or anything they can use to say its wear and tear. call them up, get them around and ask for an invoice after.

 

use this invoice along with photographs to prove you have not damaged it and to go to small claims. or first of all threaten them about going to small claims.

 

quoting SOGA 1979

48B Repair or replacement of the goods

(2) If the buyer requires the seller to repair or replace the goods, the seller must—

 

(a) repair or, as the case may be, replace the goods within a reasonable time but without causing significant inconvenience to the buyer;

(b) bear any necessary costs incurred in doing so (including in particular the cost of any labour, materials or postage).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear in mind that it is your responsibility to prove that the goods are not in conformity with the contract, and not for the store to prove that they were. The store is basically offering a service to you, as any repairer would, and is entitled to be paid for that service. You may find it cheaper to get an independant report and use that to show to the store (given that it is not down to wear and tear).

 

S. 14 of Soga does give an implied warranty that goods will last a reasonable length of time. If that has found to be breached, then you wil be entitled to damages (the cost of repair, report etc, but these must be reasonable).

 

Further to retailpointofviews comments, the Act, if read further, states that the option to repair / replace is down to the seller. What is reasonable must take into account inconvenience and cost to you as to as to themselves - a fact that many people seem to prefer to forget or dismiss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest retailpointofview

getting an independant report done is also tricky. id suggest contacting the stores HQ and ask if the local store can check it or if they have a list of local independant engineers that they would accept a report from.

 

By this i mean asking your friend down the road will not do. anyone can say it is faulty on paper but the seller needs to have this proved.

 

always best to get them to deal with it and get costs reimburst later.

 

and its alot cheaper for retailers to do it then some independants and does not affect your SOGA rights

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...