Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hello i'm new, Can someone double check me please


DiamondT
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello i am new here and this is all really confusing me. :confused:

 

Below is a copy of the 1st letter i will be sending this Sat. Can anyone please let me know of any mistakes i've made :)

Also can anyone tell me who i have to make the cheque out to please?

 

Data Protection Manager,

Data Protection Team,

Regulatory Compliance,

Abbey House,

201 Graftons Gate East,

Milton Keynes,

MK9 1AN

Jackie Scott 01908 344 061

Fax 01908 344 558

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Re. Account number:

 

 

I am writing to request a fully comprehensive list of all the default charges for direct debit, unauthorised overdrafts and standing orders I have paid over the last six years.

 

Please find enclosed a cheque for the maximum statutory charge of £10. If you are unable to provide this data, I will accept a copy of my statements going back six years; I understand that statements on their own are not covered by the Data Protection Act 1998, yet I’m not requesting the statements per se, but the charges, which I’m entitled to by law.

 

I look forward to your response within 40 days, as Abbey is obliged to reply under the Data Protection Act. If not I shall seek remedy from the Information Commissioner.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Also does anyone know - Can anything happen to my account if i dont do anything when i find out how much is owed to me?

I mean if its not equal to or more than my overdraft then im not going to claim as i cant afford to pay back my overdraft. :confused: Im sure its more than my overdraft but just worried incase its not :confused:

 

 

Thank you for you help and advise in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DiamondT, I would stick to the template letters here : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/

There are some specific things in the letters which have to be said at each stage to avoid problems later based on CAG experience.

 

They can get arsy about overdrafts, but it only seems to be if you stop using your account and, in particular, stop paying in a regular amount every month. About 5% of the overdraft limit seems to keep them off your case. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Hi diamond,

 

generally, the head office is the usual address for all correspondance, and the one i always used.

 

REGISTERED ADDRESS: -

ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE

2 TRITON SQUARE

REGENT'S PLACE

LONDON

NW1 3AN

 

 

All you are doing at the moment is asking for info that you are legally obliged to know

 

I am assuming you are not using the standard letter as you dont want to 'annoy' Abbey and risk your o/d. So with that in mind, a couple of suggested changes (taken directly from the template)

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

I would be happy to collect the Data from my local branch.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

To be honest though diamond, Abbey are getting thousands of these types of letters, and I cant see what harm sending the CAG standard template would do. Still, it's your account, and you must feel comfortable making any decisions that will affect your account.

 

Hope it all works out well for you

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both V much.

 

The letter above is from the Moneysavingexpert web site. I was told about that site 1st but then was refered to this site. I will retype the letter using the letter on here. From what you have said it sounds the better one.

 

Again Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used the templates from this site as they are, and have had no problems with my accounts. In fact i feel Abbey have been quite quick with dealing with my claim. Have not had any delaying with statements etc.

 

Hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you messiah :)

Sorry if this seems a thick question but can anyone tell me who to make the cheque out to please? I know i'll end up putting the wrong name on it if i dont ask.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will send you back a letter saying that they will send you the last 14 months worth of statements, but the rest are on michrofiche and that it is not possible to give a computer print out of the info.

They sent mt statments after 7 days and the stuff of michrofiche (all 200+ pages) on the 14th day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...