Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not really. I just wrote it based upon my credit file data with screenshots and stuff.  Also referring to multiple data points. You need to read before sending or writing it.    I have plenty of experience in this stuff so takes me half hour to write something like this. For you itll take an afternoon probably. An additional day with it on your CRA wont cause a problem.     Reference Material; ICO Credit File Guide - https://ico.org.uk/media/your-data-matters/documents/1282/credit-explained-dp- guidance.pdf ICO Main Page For Credit - https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/credit/ CMF Limitation Act 1980 - https://www.checkmyfile.com/articles/the-limitation-act-1980-and-debt-time-limits.htm Gov Limitations Act 1980 - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58/2023-11-18 (Latest Version) Transunion 6 Years - https://www.transunion.co.uk/consumer/credit-report-help/how-long-does-information-stay-on-my-credit-report-for Equifax 6 Years - https://help.equifax.co.uk/EquifaxOnlineHelp/s/article/Howlongdoesadefaultedorsettledaccountstayinmyreport Experian 6 Years - https://www.experian.co.uk/consumer/guides/defaults.html#:~:text=A default will stay on,you still%20owe%20them%20money
    • Thanks fkofilee , by any chance is there a templete for guidance that i could use to help me write the complaint?
    • Hi everyone,  There were many topics on this issue in the past. May I please have an update if anyone managed to buy or sell the house with the leasehold air space on it? would the bank lend the mortgage?  If I was not informed about the complications when selling the house. instead, they told me that this would add value to the house and sell faster which is the opposite. Can I file the case and dispute it for mis-sold and misrepresentation?  I am in the year 9th and I was not aware of the issue until I wanted to sell my house. There has been no communication since I signed the contract. The company has never contacted or updated me on how much energy the panels generated how much I used etc.    This is a free panel from the government schemes, run by  Freetricity.   Thank you   
    • All together.   
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My Head hurts


crusty git
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

An obscure thought came to me recently and is realy doing its best to drive me into a state of gibbering Lunacy, (not difficult I know)

 

Nationwide defaulted my flex account for £500 without any warning or (as far as I can see) paperwork.

 

They then sold the debt to a recovery outfit (Morecroft's)

 

This "debt" consists of charges which we all now know are illegal. If Nationwide repay these charges the theory was I would pay the debt recovery outfit.

 

But- If Morecrofts are attemping to recover an "illegal" debt this must be irrecoverable so can I refuse payment?

If you take it back one step do Nationwide have any right to sell a debt which consists of illegal charges?

 

This seems open up the vista of a whole new ball game

 

Help please before the men inwhite coats arrive.

You may think that but . . ......

____________________________________

Total repaid to date £1947.58

 

Lloyds Currrent a/c £745.27

Moneyclaim filed 17th June

Defence and AQ 25th July. Case struck out 11 Aug

reinstated and hearing 15th Jan 2007

 

Lloyds loan a/c D A request expired 19th June

Proceedings under S7 Data Protection Act issued 29th June defence and counterclaim 27 July

Hearing Jan 3 2007

Listed final hearing April 2007-

Judge declared an interest and disqualified himself

new date to be set

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of whether the bank sold or passed on the debt to Morecrofts, you still reclaim charges back off the bank. You can pay off any outstanding debt with the money you recover through your claim and in effect the debt will be satisfied - that is what I'm doing with Capital One - I have debt collectors chasing after me, and I'm telling them the amount is in dispute until I recover my charges..

25/06/08 - NatWest - Prelim letter

09/03/06 - Halifax - Settled 27/4

22/03/06 - Capital One - Settled 24/6

17/04/06 - Nationwide - Settled 8/9

 

 

Hit the DONATE BUTTON and give 5% back to support this site!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might also find - presuming that you are lucky enough to receive your payment by cheque, and not through your account - that you can offer the DCA a sum below what is currently outstanding, and effectively walk away in profit!

 

I.E. You owe £500, all of which is made up fom unlawful charges.....

 

You claim back the £500, they pay you by cheque...

 

You offer the DCA £300 to clear the account, they accept, you keep £200....

 

However, I think it's more likely that a bank will pay into the account, not giving you that option.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite sure that your reasoning is correct on this Crusty Git.

In most instances we are reclaiming unlawful bank charges that we have already paid. So when this money is returned to us, it is our money to be dispensed how we wish.I may be wrong, but as your debt is now with "Collectors" if Nationwide are to comply with the Courts, they must get Morecroft to cancel the debt. They cannot repay you what you have not paid. If all the debt is through unlawful bank charges, then the only money you would get back is whatever you have paid already to reduce the debt. Plus if Morecroft have levied any additional charges on you, they should also be cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

..In most instances we are reclaiming unlawful bank charges that we have already paid...

 

Whilst in most cases this is correct, it is not definative. I am claiming back £2024 from the Halifax, but my account is about £650 overdrawn - so I have not actually paid them all that I am claiming, so in this case I claim for the full amount, and then pay back the amount outstanding on the account.

 

In short, you don't need to have actually paid the unlawful charges in order to reclaim them. The bank are asking that I do pay back, so I claim it off them, and then use that money.

 

It can sound complicated, and even slightly stupid, but unless the bank writes off the amount owing, there is no other choice (if you discount the option of waiting for the bank to take you to court...).

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the support every one I think that lookingforinfo and Jonni are on the right track when they say that most of us are claiming for charges that we have already paid. The point is that I have not paid these charges- that is why Nationwide closed the account.

 

Therefore the "debt" that they sold is not lawful and cannot be colleceed by Nationwide let alone sold to a third party who have even less claim than Nationwide.

 

If Nationwide repay me the charges and I then pay all or some of them to a collection agency I am in effect still paying the charges but to a third party.

 

Surely it is up to Nationwide to recall the account and take the third party out of the loop?

 

Help, my heads hurting again.

You may think that but . . ......

____________________________________

Total repaid to date £1947.58

 

Lloyds Currrent a/c £745.27

Moneyclaim filed 17th June

Defence and AQ 25th July. Case struck out 11 Aug

reinstated and hearing 15th Jan 2007

 

Lloyds loan a/c D A request expired 19th June

Proceedings under S7 Data Protection Act issued 29th June defence and counterclaim 27 July

Hearing Jan 3 2007

Listed final hearing April 2007-

Judge declared an interest and disqualified himself

new date to be set

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

In affect this debt will either

 

A. be written off by you paying the Agency with the winnings.

 

B. be written off by Nationwide paying off the debt with the winnings.

 

Try not to think too much otherwise you can get too analytical.

 

Oh and take a Anadin Extra, they always work for me!

 

Lou xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

 

In short, you don't need to have actually paid the unlawful charges in order to reclaim them.

 

Sorry to jump into this thread so late in the day. Section 15 A(2) of the Theft (Amendment) Act 1996 defines a 'money transfer' as follows:

 

(2) A money transfer occurs when-

 

(a) a debit is made to one account,

(b) a credit is made to another, and

© the credit results from the debit or the debit results from the credit.

 

Thus, because the bank put a debit on your account and they will have put a corrresponding credit somewhere else (double entry accounting is a wonderful thing), under this definition they have transferred money from your account whether you have 'paid' it or not.

 

Section 15 A says that if such a transfer is by deception (which in these cases it probably is since they claim its a legitimate charge when it is not) then an offence has been committed with a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment. Interesting, huh?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Accounting is not my thing.....

 

Can you explain why there will need to be a 'credit' somewhere else? and where exactly would that be?

 

I'm not saying you are wrong, only that I don't fully understand it! :-)

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would guess the credit would appear in whatever system or account the banks use to deposit charges to. When they are debited from your account they must logically be deposited into the bank's coffers somewhere. The money can't just 'disappear' from your account and end up nowhere.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mindzai is completely correct. To keep accounts balanced there must always be a corresponding credit for every debit (and vice versa). What it boils down to is that, if the bank have put a debit on your account then, as far as the law is concerned, they have transferred money from your account.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, that being the case I will pass these comments onto the rest of the team and see if we can take this anywhere....

 

Well done and thanks.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S. So that we don't hijack this thread, I have started a new one just for this issue...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/56427-theft-act-15a-there.html

 

Please continue with this issue over there....

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

You may think that but . . ......

____________________________________

Total repaid to date £1947.58

 

Lloyds Currrent a/c £745.27

Moneyclaim filed 17th June

Defence and AQ 25th July. Case struck out 11 Aug

reinstated and hearing 15th Jan 2007

 

Lloyds loan a/c D A request expired 19th June

Proceedings under S7 Data Protection Act issued 29th June defence and counterclaim 27 July

Hearing Jan 3 2007

Listed final hearing April 2007-

Judge declared an interest and disqualified himself

new date to be set

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...