Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I need to get a hamster. lol
    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

smile-trying out new ways to charge?


lwebster5263
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm lizzie and new to the forum and have found the threads very interesting. Has anyone else experienced this? A few days ago I read my latest statement and was astounded to read that smile were going to charge me £15 & £5 for going overdrawn for 1 day - I immediately sent a secure message asking them to explain this as I had been within my agreed overdraft limit.

First reply -quote"you have been charged as the debits that went out of your account on the 31/01/2007, left your account before the credit of £xxx(my salary). This is the way our processing works, debits will leave your account before credits come in. This is why we advise to have funds available in your account at least one working day before a debit is due to leave your account."

I had to sent another 2 messages and wait a couple of days but finally got a reply today:quote"I'm sorry for the last message. This is incorrect. if you go overdrawn on the same day you go back in credit you don't get any charges. Looking at your account this £20 charges shouldn't be applied. I'm afraid we must have had a system problem"

The second reply was fair enough but I found the first one disturbing. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Smile too and I thought that you had to be over your overdraft limit for 24 hours before they charged you so if money goes out of your account and cleared funds go in they won't charge you.

 

I don't know if they've recruited a lot of new staff recently but I've been told loads of really weird stuff recently which has all been corrected when I've queried it. :confused:

 

I think they're all getting a bit absent minded as they're so busy refunding penalty charges ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smile had charged me for a direct debit they claimed they had to pay, then this took me overdrawn and they charged me for going overdrawn. So in total it was about £55.

 

I phoned them up and there response was to phone later in the month when the overdrawn charges get debited from my account and they will correct the problem. Why couldn't they do it then???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smile - ethical? :rolleyes: Yeah, not to us that's for sure. I've just found out they've cancelled all my direct debits (without warning), this the month after they didn't pay my mortgage even though there was sufficient money in the account as 'we weren't to know your money was there'. Errrrrrr? So, I now have a £35 charge on my mortgage because they didn't pay my mortgage of £792 when there was £1400 in my account!

 

Similarly, after the end of my first month with them, I faced loads of direct debit charges and started getting letters about my car loan, mortgage, etc. Smile had withdrawn my overdraft without warning. When I phoned up they said, "That was an error - we admit it".

 

To say I'm angry with Smile is a complete understatement. I've had no communication from them at all when they've done these things and I've had to bear the financial ramifications of their button pushing.

 

Even today trying to call them to find out what the hell has happened to my direct debits I was told, "The dept who deal with that aren't in till Monday". And this months direct debits are due to come off in the next few days!

 

Just when you thought you were getting over your money worries and this happens.

 

Certainly nothing to friggin' well Smile about in my house at the moment.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...