Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • “Not realising it was a no parking zone” doesn’t help you if the timing is correct, as (at least, on Google Maps / View) there is clear signage ('7am to midnight', parked at 15:22) What might be worth pursuing is the "ticket handed to driver" aspect : do you have any view on why they would be  stating that?
    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default Served despite account being in Dispute


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:-x I'm bloody mad as hell.

 

Had a dispute with the Halifax starting in Sept to reclaim my bank charges. As is common to a lot of people doing this, I was continually harassed, chased and hounded to repay my overdraft during that time. In December I was given back over £3000 worth of charges, yet today I received a notification of a change to my credit account. When I looked it up, it transpires that the Halifax have passed notification of a defult served during the dispute to the credit reference agency!!!

 

This despite them being told by myself on numerous occasions that doing so was a breach of the Banking Code and Data Protection Act! In fact, I am still awaiting a response from them to a section 10 notice served on 4th Dec advising them of this!!! I have sent recorded delivery reminders and faxes to them to this effect, but they have never responded and the first I heard was an email alert from Credit Expert to this change on my credit file.

 

To say I am fizzing mad at the moment is an understatement. I've given them until 5pm today to respond to me. If they don't, I'm appointing a solicitor.

 

I wish I'd never been a Halifax 'customer' ever in my life.

 

I guess I can kiss goodbye to that preferential mortgage rate now. I'm not even going to say what I think about them as I know it will only be edited.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats disgusting, im not suprised you are mad. Christ, whenever i get one of those credit expert Alerts i panic.

At the moment i dont have any default on my credit report from Halifax, but am now worried if i win then they will do the same. let us know what happens next as i may need to go down the same route!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just managed to find an email address for their Head of Customer Services despite the random call centre person telling me that he couldn't give that info out. Funny how a search of the FSA Register finds it within seconds!!

 

I definitely will keep you posted, but the next hour of will life will be spent finding a solicitor in Edinburgh willing to take this on. If no satisfactory resolution to this by 5pm tonight, my solicitors will be taking this up with them on Monday morning at 9.

 

Basically, if I have a default against me, I lose my career. I certainly don't intend being a 30 yr old who's life is gubbed because of these 'people' (note my use of the word 'people' is to avoid any editing if I used the words I have been calling them for the past hour).

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest is that the Glasgow branch phoned a human in customer services (a victory really since I got an automated press 1 for no help, press 2 for less help, press 3 to be insulted, press 4 to go back to the beginning and get even moer agitated............................). They said it related to my credit card. I spoke to the credit card people and they said that it was nothing to do with them! It does relate to the accout that was in dispute, it is not a default but the credit reference agency record it as if it is!

 

Now been given the number of retail bank collections to call and see if I can get through to someone in under half an hour.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Managed to get his sorted on Friday afternoon. For anyone in dispute with the Halifax, I'm sure you're all aware that there is next to no communication between Customer Services and the Collections team. Although I had been constantly telling the Collections team that there was a dispute, apparently they never received such a notifcation from the team handling the dispute in Customer Services, hence the default notice being served despite the dispute.

 

Collections served my default, despite something like 20 calls where I ahd told them that there was an ongoing dispute. From speaking to Collections on Friday afternoon, they saud that they would not have served a default had someone within Customer Services told them a dispute was occuring.

 

The end result for me was that the default is going to be corrected with all the third parties that they have communicated this to. But a valuable learning experience for anyone who thinks that dealing with this Bank is straightforward. They think like seperate organisations, not one company, and it may be in customer's interests to ensure that all contact with the Customer Services Team is also relayed to the Collections Dept if they are still chasing for money.

 

I can honestly say that I wish I'd never ever stepped into a Halifax branch before in my life.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...