Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Steady on, that’s almost as blunt as my response I’m just not sure the OP is going to get the answer / “nuanced response” it seems they were hoping for ……..
    • My mind is a blur so i cant recall exactly what the judge said at the end, but he mentioned that he would be making an order for Evri to make payment to me. I wasn't sure if the court order will also be provided to me, either by post or email - if anyone can shed some light please?
    • Agree with everyone here it's bang to rights. Looks like you just slightly jinked left in order to go right. Ultimately, your time saving attempt is going to cost you as I don't think you have any grounds to appeal. I'd just pay the charge and chalk it up to experience.
    • Thank you everyone!  thought to share some points from my experience in court today that may help others who are taking Evri to court: The judge sets out how the hearing will go and how each party should behave; while i was certainly feeling anxious/nervous ahead of the hearing (and I'm sure @jk2054 may have also observed this), the judge really does try to put any non-legal persons at ease; refrain from talking to the other party and instead speak to the judge if you have any questions/responses; the judge and the advocate spoke about tort of negligence - i wasn't sure how this applied to my case but the judge was questionning the advocate about this so i chose to stay out of this; the judge made reference to a historical case of Donaghue v Stevenson which established a duty of care; the judge observed that some of the points in Evri's witness statement by george wood needed cross examination but george was not present today for questionning; While i was claiming 8% interest, the judge pointed out that is the upper limit and that today, savings accounts give 4-5%. I therefore opted for 5% interest which was agreed to by the judge and the advocate; above all else, ensure you know your court bundle and have any notes to help you refer to specific sections - it helped me to structure my answers to the judge/defendant's queries, and point to specific evidence where i was asked to prove e.g., the value of the item. @honeybee13 - yes, will confirm when payment is received. I have emailed the Evri.claims email with my bank details and also provided them after the hearing to the advocate. @BankFodder message received and i am replying to it
    • Looks promising then.  Well done   Dx
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DVD Recorder


dollypops
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

Purchased a DVD Recorder from Comet last February, the thing has never worked right, always resetting itself at the end of recordings and thus giving bad discs and a waste of time recording. Then suddenly it would work fine again for a few months.

 

The guarantee runs out next month and i was thinking of taking it back before then to see if they can repair it, Is it worth the effort and hassle or should i just let the guarantee run out then claim through the credit card company, for an easy life ?

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's always best to make a complaint to the trader as soon as you know there is a fault, but hindsight is a wonderful thing and I'm not always very great at practising what I preach!

 

*****

 

When you talk about the guarantee, this is with the manufacturer and not the trader, and it is completely bound to whatever terms and conditions the manufacturer includes. They can include whatever terms and conditions they like, and don't have to offer a guarantee at all if they don't want to! Once the period of the guarantee is up, that's that, you can't pursue the manufacturer legally any longer.

 

*****

 

You also have separate rights against the trader. These are your statutory rights under the Sale of Goods Act. This Act states that all goods you buy must be of satisfactory quality, fit for all normal purposes and as described. Your rights under this Act can last for up to 6 years (due to the statute of limitation), but will not cover normal wear and tear.

 

You have a short period of time after buying goods in which to check them for faults and if faulty to take them back for a full refund. This is often about 3 weeks. After this time has passed, the trader is entitled to offer a repair or replacement in the first instance.

 

If repair or replacement fails or is impossible, you are then entitled to rescind the contract, which basically means a refund less any amount for wear and tear you have enjoyed from the product.

 

Remember these rights are against the trader where you bought the goods as they are the ones you contracted with, and can last for up to 6 years so longer than a normal manufacturers warranty.

 

Within the first six months of purchase, the onus is on the trader to prove that the goods are not faulty. After six months, the onus is on you (the buyer) to prove that the goods are faulty and were inherently faulty from the time of purchase (i.e. a manufacturing fault as opposed to being normal wear and tear)

 

*****

 

Be aware that if you go to the manufacturer under the guarantee instead of back to the trader under the Sale of Goods Act, you may affect your future rights against the trader if things go wrong again. For example, if you buy a Sony stereo from Comet and it goes wrong in 6 months and Sony replaces it directly, you now have a different machine from the one you bought from Comet and therefore can no longer take it back to Comet. Does this make sense?

 

*****

 

Additionally, if you have paid either partially or in full by credit card or finance arranged by the trader, and the goods cost over £100, you have rights under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act. This makes the finance company equally liable for any breaches of contract by the trader, i.e. paying for the repair or replacement of faulty goods. This is particularly useful where the trader is being obstinate or has gone out of business.

 

Most people claim from the trader first and then pursue the finance company if they don't succeed. If you go straight to the finance company the first thing they will probably do is get in touch with the trader about the issue. Although there's nothing to stop you singularly pursuing the credit card company, I wouldn't recommend it if the "trader" avenue is also open.

 

 

 

Hope this helps. I would advise you to act quickly now, you have unfortunately already lost the benefit of the reversed burden of proof in the first six months (trader having to prove it's not faulty rather than you having to prove it is faulty). Personally I would go for Comet under the Sale of Goods Act - write them a letter detailing the faults, state that the item does not comply with the Sale of Goods Act as it is not of satisfactory quality or fit for all normal purposes, and therefore you are seeking a repair or replacement item by (date). Copy it to your credit card company for information so they know there's a problem. See what they say.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was quick ! :)

 

Thanks a lot for your help, the item was an ex display model reduced from £200 to just £70 so thats why i snapped it up, looks like i'm not covered by the Credit Card scheme then.

 

I will pop back into comet with the machine on saturday then, see if they will repair it. And take it from there.

 

Thanks for your help so far

dollypops

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem! Let us know how you get on.

 

Don't let them fob you off and tell you that you have to go to the manufacturer, or that you've left it too late. Incidentally the fact it was ex display makes no difference to your rights either, if they think of trying that one!

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest beedydad

Hi

 

I also have a problem over a faulty goods purchased from Comet online. which is nearly 4 years old and will be pursueing them for restoration, compensation or replacement.

 

Just to add to the earlier comments about Sale of Goods Act, Which online have details about this area and have added a section about how long is acceptable for goods to last see below which may also assist.

 

The legal bit

 

If you've unwittingly purchased faulty goods, the chances are you're entitled to some kind of compensation. Which? reveals your rights - and how long they last.

 

Navigate this report

 

When you buy anything from a shop, you have certain rights under the Sale of Goods Act. These are often referred to as your statutory rights. The law states that, when you buy goods, they must meet the description given, be fit for purpose, and be of satisfactory quality.

In plain English, whatever you buy must do what it's supposed to, be in good condition, free of faults, safe, and must last for a reasonable length of time.

How long something should last will vary from product to product, crucially, if you do have a claim, it's the retailer that you claim against- the manufacturer only has to honour any guarantee or warranty they have given with the product. There are limits on how long you have to take a claim to court too, the action has to be started within six years of when you purchased the item or took delivery (except in Scotland, where the limit is five years)

How long is reasonable?

 

One of the ambiguities of the Sale of Goods Act is that it doesn't define how long products should last, because different products have different life spans. And even two identical products can have varying life spans, depending on how much they're used.

While the list below is not a comprehensive one it gives a general indication of life expectancy for a range of product types. This information is an extract from the Radio, Electrical, and Television Retailers Association's Code of Practice

Small appliances

Irons, Kettles, Hair Dryers etc. 2 - 5 years

Medium Size Appliances

Cleaners, direct acting space heaters, refrigerators and freezers, spin and tumble dryers, Microwave Ovens 3 - 8 years

Larger Appliances

Electric Cookers, 8 - 10 years

Dishwashers, washing machines, 4 – 8 years

Low priced portable CTVs 3 - 5 years

Higher priced non-portable CTVs 5 - 8 years

Low priced VCRs and DVDs 2 - 5 years

Higher priced VCRs and DVDs 5 - 8 years

Low priced Hi-Fi Systems 2 - 5 years

Higher priced Hi-Fi systems 5 - 8 years

 

Note

Life expectancy is the length of time a product would reasonably be expected to be able to be economically repaired where the spare parts are available. Some cosmetic parts may not be available for the same period of time as functional parts.

It does not imply that goods should last for a given period of time without going wrong or that the repairer should not make a reasonable charge for a repair.

 

 

Beedydad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well popped into comet today with the recorder.

 

Told them the spiel about whats wrong with the machine, guy looked at me like i had horns or something then took it off me, filled in the form and said it will take bout 15days for repair.

 

So heres hoping

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, got the recorder back from them last saturday the 3rd feb, with a slip saying it had a new optical unit in it.

 

So got home set it all up again and popped in a blank DVD-R

 

Up pops a message.....

 

Copy prohibited, Can Not Record

 

So i swear loudly !

 

Then try a blank DVD-RW

 

Up pops a message.....

 

Copy prohibited, Can Not Record

 

So i swear some more.

 

This is just recording from the tv, i am not trying to pirate movies or anything. Am now at a loss what to do, what is my next move, The warranty runs out on 3rd March.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take it back to the store as soon as possible, inform them that the repair that they have carried out has failed and in fact the machine is worse than it was prior to their fault, give them one final chance to repair the item and put it into the state it should be in (i.e. full working order!) and state that if they cannot do this within a reasonable time you will be looking at an alternative solution, i.e. replacement or rescission (partial refund).

 

(You may not legally be entitled to a brand new identical replacement entirely free of charge but we will cross that bridge when we come to it!).

 

Follow this up in writing to the store to confirm what you are expecting them to do, and keep a copy so you have this for your records if needed later.

 

Don't panic about the warranty, your rights under the Sale of Goods Act can last for up to six years (though don't cover normal wear and tear) so you don't have to worry about losing any entitlement to redress in this case.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...