Reinstate a struck out claim

[BankFodder]

The late payment of the fee is a mere technicality. I would have thought that there will be no problem in having the claim reinstated. However it may be that the claimant will have to do this by means of an application notice for which the fee would be about 250 quid or so.
If it does go to court and you lose you should certainly argue that the £250 fee for the application notice was incurred through the claimant's own fault and so you should not be made liable for this.

Do we know about this? Why don't you tell us the story

[BankFodder]

You've been here since 2009 – did you never think to come and post here and laid out and ask us for help earlier on when this all started?

 

Mind you, seven months to pay the hearing fee and they still haven't done it – this could seriously undermine their attempt to have it reinstated

Who was it who identified the joint expert?

[BankFodder]

Well – Big Fail!

If you had come to us as soon as things started to go wrong we might have been able to sort things out. It's not as if we were going to charge you £300 an hour. We do it for free but this kind of thing just makes us work a lot harder then we need to.

Please post up the claim form in PDF format and also your defence in PDF format.

How long is the report? I suppose you had better post that up in PDF format as well

[BankFodder]

Well if you won't redact them then I'd really am not too sure how we can help you

[BankFodder]

We need to see the claim form and the defence in PDF format please

[BankFodder]

It's all very garbled.

You been here since 2009. You wait until the trouble gets out of hand – then eventually you come here and initially declined to post up any information on the grounds that it needs rejecting.
Then eventually because the claim is reinstated you decide to take the trouble to redact it.
You then redact it so much that the is confusing to understand who is who. Use the same symbols for everybody. You might be talking about your cat using the same symbols = =.

It seems to be at some point you had identified a good quality kitchen and then for some reason rather your builder persuaded you to buy a kitchen from a company run by his wife!

You went further and then found herself in a load of trouble. It didn't occur to you that the builder may be had his own interests in mind.

I know that I'm sounding tough here – but I think that we need to sort this out and start being businesslike about it.

I'd like you to start a completely new thread please.

No mucking around.

Start off by telling us the story in bullet pointed chronology.

I'd like to know apart from the brief facts – minimum narrative – how much you promise to pay. How much has actually cost you. I have the impression although it's not clear that you are actually out-of-pocket and that you don't appear to put in a counterclaim.

The claim form that they have used to start the process give scarcely any facts and is a load garble. You have responded with a load of garble including a lot of non-relevant information so far as I can see.

Let's start to straighten this out.

And once again, if you come here right at the beginning we could have saved an enormous amount of aggravation for you and also for us.

I'm closing the thread.

Let's start having a look at this properly.

You can redact the forms for your own personal identifiers if you want. Leave the rest alone. The less you tamper with the documents the better it will be. The more we will understand the easier it will go