Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Birmingham Midshires v.uncooperative!


brownie24
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6369 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

After sending my SAR request letter to Birminigham Midshires on 23rd November, in which I clearly stated that I wanted complete list of transactions and a breakdown of my redemption figure I received in the post last Thursday a great big pile of what I can only call rubbish......and it certainly did not include any mortgage statements or any figures relating to any ERC paid or any fees charged on the account! Instead it was just documents realting to our initial mortgage application, solicitors documents and evidence of phone calls that had taken place over the years between myself and BM.

 

So I got on the phone to BM and asked why they had not sent me actual mortgage statements as I had requested.....well I got a rather snotty lady on the other end who told me that I had received all the info that they were entitled to send me under the Data Protection act and that Mortgage statements were not covered under the SAR and that if I did want actual mortgage statements and a breakdown of my ERC that I would have to request this separately and that this would incur another charge as it would have to be prepared manually and would be £20 per page and was likely to be three pages long!!!!!!

 

Well I adamantly disagreed with this and said that I beggged to differ and that under the Data Protection Act I was entitled to mortgage statements and the £10 fee I had already paid for this was sufficient. After much heated discussion she went away to speak to another department and came back to me and reluctantly told me that she would send me a closing statement free of charge which would include the ERC but they would not send me copies of my actual mortgage statements!:x

 

Has anyone else had any similar probs with BM and are they actually breaching the Data Protection Act by failing to supply me with mortgage statements? Does this mean I can report them?

 

Any advice would be muchly appreciated

 

Brownie24:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brownie,

 

We've had a few successes from BM.

 

Under a SAR they have to supply all personal data they hold on you and this would include statements.

 

Send an LBA for non compliance

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brownie

 

I have a case going on with them at the moment. They do get frustrating when you try to negotiate with them. I have made 11 calls to their solicitors just asking if they have heard back from BM about their next move, settle or battle. Keep getting told that they are waiting for BM to answer their requests. From the last conversation even the solicitors are getting frustrated. I will produce my phone log to show the judge that i have been resonable and that calls have been made to settle this, this won't look good on BM.

 

Ukaviator

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

After a struggle to get the a break down of the ERCs I paid to BM I have finally received this information.

 

Now I would like to know what exactly I can claim back, on the list of mortgage transactions that they have sent me I have had to pay the following fees:

 

ERC - which I know I can try and claim back

Vacating fee - can I reclaim this?

Interest - can I recalim this?

Assessment fee - can I reclaim this? (I think this refers to an unpaid dd charge)

 

Any help would be much appreciated. Also is there a template of a letter that I shoud use as a prelim approach letter?

 

Cheers

 

Brownie24

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh just another quick one I will be trying to reclaim the ERC on two mortgage accounts both held with BM. Can I incorporate both of these accounts on to one letter when sending my preliminary request for payment?

 

Thanks

 

Brownie24

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...