Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • upload sites dont retain copies and so what if they do... what do you think they are going to do, kidnap your grannies budgie or something..how the hell would any of the info required by us be of any use to them..... stop being paranoid and put them all in one mass multipage pdf.  
    • https://audicam.audi.co.uk/customer/6660055/00cc584e9769699ddba3807a2995032f/59022-13062024 Please let me know if you can access footage 
    • If it is only the registration plate – then there is no problem. In fact it's better because if big motoring world realise that you are getting advice and that you are coming for them, it will make them more likely to pay attention. There is no point in secrecy in these kinds of things. Let's see the video so we can understand what's happening
    • Hi i have the video footage now downloaded on my computer. However, the video has some personal information such as the reg. I have tried editing out the plate but struggling.
    • Well I certainly wouldn't worry about the registration number. It will actually be a good idea to have it on display for people who end up being offered it in the future once you have managed to return it. What other personal details are there? And anyway, you should have a copy for yourself anyway. You should be doing this kind of thing. You should be recording all telephone calls and confirming telephone calls in writing. You should record all conversations that you have with them in person. You should have a call recorder on your telephone and should keep that in your pocket. This is not the time to start getting slack and casual. I think you've already paid the price for this. You must now start getting your act together, getting evidence. Making sure that you have copies. Stop relying on other people to either tell you the truth – or to hold copies of things for you which might then be difficult to get from them if they feel that they are being compromised. Why can't you even access the video and record it onto your own computer?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Shipping USA - UK duty and tax invoice from fedex


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 502 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Not sure if anybody will know the answer to this or even if I posted in the right place.

 

In November I did a transatlantic cruise UK - USA as I was then travelling on internal flights etc in the US

 

l looked for the option to send clothes home as had no use for formal wear etc while travelling. Found a company who ship to the UK (a facility in florida. You can order from US websites and they store and send on to the UK) I checked it was an option for me to send my clothes to them for them to then forward on as usually its for new items etc they advised wouldn't be a problem. I went to a UPS store boxed them up and sent them to the facility. I then paid around £95 to have my clothes sent to me once I was back home in the UK. 

 

Received my items about 2 weeks ago then last week I received a duty & tax invoice from FedEx asking for me to pay £86.61

£12.75 disbursement fee

£17.81 original duty

£56.05 original vat

 

Does anyone know what this is for?

 

FedEx are absolutely useless the website takes you in circles to an faq, the telephone number also just directs you to the faq and you can't speak to anyone, twitter also useless as they direct me to the faq or the option to fill in a form that you can't actually write anything in only input your invoice number and select from a drop down. 

I didn't think I had to to pay the above for my own used clothes and don't know what to do. I can prove that the clothes where bought in the UK before my travels as I have receipts for the majority of my items but don't know if this matters. 

 

Any help would be massively appreciated 

 

Danielle 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore

nothing they can do really,

 

they might send a scary DCa after you, again they are powerless and not bailiffs.

 

you got the items and in both cases these were charges levied afterwards,  ignore them all!

 

lost count of the numbers of times ive had uncle tom cobbly and all chasing bogus custom fees from me.

ups, royal mail admin offices, EVRi, process control ltd. etc etc ....not alot anyone can do to you.

 

dx

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@mp3loverontoast Usually shippers require you to pay the duty and VAT before they will deliver but in this case they have already delivered so not much they can do about it.

 

In any case I suspect this all arises from some sort of error in how Fedex categorised the clothing. It looks like they have treated your clothes as being items purchased in the USA and being imported into the UK for the first time. If that had been the case it is correct that the shipper has to collect Import Duty and VAT on behalf of the UK tax authorities and pass it to HM Revenue and Customs. But it is not the case. This is clothing you purchased in the UK with UK duty and VAT paid and is not liable to being taxed again. AFAIK it makes no difference to the tax position whether you have the clothes in your possession or whether you ship them ahead by carrier.

 

As what you were doing is probably not that common, and as your clothes had passed through UPS and a storage company before they even reached Fedex, there was plenty of opportunity for misunderstanding the tax position.

 

The 'disbursement fee' is probably the administration fee that Fedex charge for dealing with the duty and tax collection and payment.

 

It's no different than when you go on holiday with your clothes etc in a suitcase and return with them in a suitcase. UK customs don''t ask everyone to pay duties and tax on their clothes or other possessions every time they come back from holiday if the clothing was originally bought in the UK. 

 

As you say, you have already paid UK VAT on them and have receipts to prove it. If push came to shove having the receipts to prove you bought them in the UK VAT paid would very much matter. They would be the key evidence that you were not liable to be taxed again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...