Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

WELCOME FINANCE: PPI CLAIM - Initial letter following SAR


cjm_2006
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6319 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'd appreciate it if people in a similar boat could review this letter and advise accordingly :)

 

if anyone has had any similar dealings with welcome, regardless of outcome, i'd very much like to hear about it.

 

I have borrowed bits from other PPI refund claim letters floating around.

 

i'm sending this next week - if there are any parts that those in the know feel are a bit inflammatory, i'll take them out.

 

I know individuals shouldn't enter into disputes like this with an angry head, but the way this company operates makes me sick - they are literally nothing more than legitamised loan sharks.

 

I was told exclusively that if i did not agree to the PPI, i wouldn't get the loan. the total amount for the PPI premium over the term was bundled into the loan amount up front, and that was that.

 

anyway - rant over - letter below:

 

 

xxxxxx

 

 

 

 

Account Number: XXXXXXXX

 

MIS-SELLING of PPI - COMPLAINT

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I took out a loan with your company on December 15th, 2003, At an APR of 32.8%.

 

When I took out the loan, I was not offered any quotations without PPI; I was told that I would not have been given the loan if I did not take PPI. I have since been told that this is not true, and that you are not allowed to make PPI a condition of taking out the loan unless you include the costs of PPI in your quoted loan interest rate, which you did not do.

 

I did call several months after to enquire about cancelling the PPI – in order to lower my monthly repayments and alleviate ongoing financial difficulties – and I was told that this was not possible; again, another incorrect statement.

 

Your loan agreement states this as ‘optional’ – this is a wholly misleading term.

 

I therefore consider that I have been mis-sold this obscenely expensive insurance, which I do not need and which I said at the time that I did not want. I’ve spent some time researching this matter and it appears I’m not the only welcome finance customer in this position. You took advantage of my poor credit rating and desperation, at the time, in order to extract the largest possible profit margins.

 

The stated PPI amount listed on the agreement is £812.68.

 

I have been advised that I should be able to cancel the PPI contract at any time and receive a refund of the premium that I have paid. I would like to do this - And in view of the way I was mis-sold the insurance, I would like to ask for a full refund of the whole premium.

 

I would appreciate a reply to this letter within fourteen days. If you reject this complaint, I would be grateful if you could state whether you provide an internal appeals process. If you do not, please supply me with a final response letter, so that I can take up the matter with the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Please do not assume that I will be satisfied with anything other than a full and prompt refund of the entire £812.68. If this does not happen, I will happily escalate my complaint and also contact press agencies with details of this matter.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

XXX XXXXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

xxxxx

 

MIS-SELLING of PPI - COMPLAINT - Maybe change to request for ppi return

 

Dear Sir or Madam, sir/madam

 

I took out a loan with your company on December 15th, 2003, At an APR of 32.8%. On 15th december 2003, i entered into an agreement with your company

 

When I took out the loan, when i entered the agreement I was not offered provided with a quotation which excluded ppi any quotations without PPI; I was told that I would not have been given the loan if I did not take PPI.i was informed by a member of staff(name) I have since been told that this is not true, and that you are not allowed to make PPI a condition of taking out the loan unless you include the costs of PPI in your quoted loan interest rate, which you did not do.

 

I did call several months after to enquire about cancelling the PPI – in order to lower my monthly repayments and alleviate ongoing financial difficulties – and I was told that this was not possible; again, another incorrect statement.

 

Your loan agreement states this as ‘optional’ – this is a wholly misleading term.

 

I therefore consider that I have been mis-sold this obscenely expensive insurance, which I do not need and which I said at the time that I did not want. I’ve spent some time researching this matter and it appears I’m not the only welcome finance customer in this position. i would not include this You took advantage of my poor credit rating and desperation, at the time, in order to extract the largest possible profit margins. liabilous

 

The stated PPI amount listed on the agreement is £812.68.

 

I have been advised that I should be able to cancel the PPI contract at any time and receive a refund of the premium that I have paid. do you mean a partial refund I would like to do this - And in view of the way I was mis-sold the insurance, I would like to ask for a full refund of the whole premium.

 

I would appreciate a reply to this letter within fourteen days. If you reject this complaint, I would be grateful if you could state whether you provide an internal appeals process. If you do not, please supply me with a final response letter, so that I can take up the matter with the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Please do not assume that I will be satisfied with anything other than a full and prompt refund of the entire £812.68. If this does not happen, I will happily escalate my complaint and also contact press agencies with details of this matter.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

It might be better adjusting the prelim letter for ppi.

 

if you are sending this letter change ppi into the full form of payment protection insurance

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hiya CJM

Did you get a reply from Welcome?

Im trying to sort all my figures out so that I can do the same, and was just wondering how they take the news! lol

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i surely did:

 

######################

dear mr XXXXXXXX

 

i have been advised by our complaints dept you have made a statement that you were told when you took out the loan the payment protection was compulsory. (atrocious grammar :))

 

as the loan was taken whilst your agreement was at the cardiff branch and i am obviously unable to comment on what process was followed, i have taken the opportunity to enclose copies of the personal loan agreement form and the customer declaration forms which you signed at the time of the loan which confirms you are aware of the terms and conditions of the agreement and insurances. i have highlighted the appropriate points for perusal. (crappy photocopies of documents I already have following my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) stapled to letter).

 

I would also point out that on 17.03.05 we sent a settlement figure to you which included the breakdown of insurances and the rebates available on settlement. a settlement figure was also produced on 10.8.06 outlining the same information. on both occasions you did not question the insurances.

 

it appears from the information provided on the application form you were eligible for and met the criteria for being recommended the insurances which also included medicare 24 cover.

 

I would confirm our company policy toi cancel insurances is within 30 days of recieving the policy documents which includes a section on your cancellation rights. the agreement was written in decemeber 2003 and so is outside your cancellation rights.

 

i trust my explanation is suitable for your purposes but if you require additional information you may contact me at the above address.

 

yours sincerely

 

janet xxxxxx

branch manager

##################

 

so basically, a fob off letter, poorly written, which argues the following points:

 

  • account has 'changed branch' so the new branch isn't responsible for the conduct of staff at the original branch. I don't need to elaborate on how unbelievably laughable that argument is.
  • that i was aware of the terms and conditions & my right to cancel. B*llocks was I! they kept me in a tiny office room for over an hour while the loan was being agreed, when I said I didn't want the insurance, i was categorically told that no PPI = no loan!
  • I've had 2 settlement figures and I didn't question the insurance at either time..... well, i was so shocked at how big the settlement figures were, i guess i missed that one. and i didn't know what i know now!
  • i was elligible for the insurance..... i don't care if i was or wasn't, i was forced into taking it and at no point during the application process was I shown a quote without PPI! why not? because the salesperson was going to make a wedge of commission on the deal!

I hate welcome finance even more now. but to be honest, I wasn't really expecting anything other than a response letter containing the utter crap that this letter contains.

 

I'm drafting a response to this letter - i'm also considering signing up with a compensation specialist for this claim, it's not the money i'm bothered about, it's beating these loan sharks. I'll happily give away 25% for the smug feeling i'll have at the end.

 

by the way, my loan was for 2500, I'm still paying it back (2 payments left), i've already paid back over 5k, and the total cost of the insurance - bundled in up-front - was £812.

 

welcome - stay well away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...