Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mill Motors Bedford Faulty 2nd Hand Car - Court Claim Issued **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 174 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is great news. Congratulations.

If you have a moment, it would be helpful if you could give us a summary of what happened. Did the other side turn up? What did they try to say? What did you say in response? What did the judge say? What questions that the judge ask? How did the judge some up in the end?

He said that the judge has given them 14 days to pay. You will have to wait until the expiry of that 14 days before you can start instructing bailiffs. What was the value of the claim? I expect it was more than £600 but I haven't looked through the thread.

Start researching the High Court enforcement officers because you should get the judgement transferred to the High Court for about 70 quid (which you will get back once it is enforced) and they will do the job for you. High Court enforcement officers (sheriffs) do serious enforcement whereas the county court bailiffs have limited powers and they are pussycats.


Also, the sheriffs generally speaking charge about two grand for enforcement which will have to be paid by the defendant. Make sure that the High Court enforcement service that you find is clear that it is no fee for you if the enforcement fails. This is the normal way it goes nowadays. But double check. That means that if the enforcement fails then your maximum exposure is about 70 quid. It would be about 50 quid or so anyway with the county court bailiffs.

You are asking how long you can get them to pick up the car. I would say that you put them on notice that the car has to be collected otherwise it will be sold.
I haven't looked at this thread. Is the car driveable? Have you been using it? Where is it now? Have you been insuring it? Have you incurred any expenses since you began the court action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I see that you have been withholding the name of the person you have been selling. Please can you tell us who it is – and any other details including address et cetera.

It's important the other people and see this and it's important that this person realises that when they do this kind of thing they will find their name on the Internet.

There is no downside for you. There is no reason to protect him

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should write to the defendant. Write to him at any address that he might have – in other words more than one copy of your letter – inform him of the judgement. Tell him that you are prepared to hang onto the car for another two weeks but you will be charging him £200 per week storage and in addition to that, you will be charging him a further £50 per week since the date the claim was issued.

Tell him that if he has not contacted you all made arrangements to remove the vehicle and to pay the storage fees at the end of two weeks that you will then make arrangements to sell the car and that you will reimbursing the money that you gain from the car after having deducted all monies owed to you. This would include the storage, and any of the judgements sum which has not been collected.

I suppose it is unlikely that you are going to recover your money from this guy. He is clearly a crook.
How much do you think the car is worth? At the end of two weeks it might be worth doing a calculation to find out whether it is worth spending the money getting it roadworthy and then selling it or just selling it as it is.

Congratulations on sticking it out. It's been a difficult road for you.

Anyway, put into the hands of the High Court enforcement officers. Do some of your own private research and see if you can find out where this guy is hiding.

Interesting that you have been blocked from auto Trader.

I suggest you send auto Trader an SAR. I think that you should try and find out what has happened. You know if this dealer is still using them?

Send them an SAR immediately. You may as well send them a copy of a utilities bill or something as evidence of your identity. They are entitled to ask that.

After that we will help you get the block removed and if they refuse then you can bring a little action against them as well for a bit of extra money.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Don't change your position at all. You have set out the terms and don't budge 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thank you very much indeed for this update.

I'm very pleased that it was sorted out for you in the end.

I'm afraid that you're probably one of the lucky few who have these experiences with used-car dealers and then try to challenge them.

Hopefully others will see your thread and learn from your story as well

As you can imagine, we have expenses to pay and if you wanted to click our donation button, it wouldn't go unappreciated!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...