Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC _ Metropolitan collection services


blackmanfamily
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4652 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Metro are a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC in other words its just HSBC's debt collection department.

Like all debt collection companies all they care about is getting money off you and they can be pretty heavy handed doing it. Just keep replying to any letters they send confirming that the debt is in dispute and they should refer the matter back to HSBC.

If they phone you (and they will try this) tell them you don't discuss financial matters over the phone and put all of their questions it in writing, it worth noting they are not allowed to talk to you if you don't answer their security questions so don't answer them :)

 

The balance of your account (the debt) is in dispute as soon as you ask for your charges back however they could try to argue this point if you haven't started litigation.

 

Have a look at post #213, #314 and #319 on my thread if you want some ideas about what to put in letters.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/85633-castelbest-ii-return-claims.html

 

good luck :)

 

pete

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hiya spice have they said why they are calling you? I've never known Metro work for any other bank or financial body so unless they are branching out it will be to do with HSBC.

 

If they phone again see if you can get some more detail off them.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I'm assuming Metro are phoning you, start logging the calls you receive and tell them you are doing this, date, time and the name of the person who is calling you.

 

They shouldn't discuss anything with you until you have answered their security questions so refuse to do this and tell them you don't discuss financial matters over the phone and to write to you instead.

 

Have you spoken to the FOS? told them you are being harassed by Metro?

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit rusty on bankruptcy but from memory, once an official receiver has been appointed all creditors must deal with him regarding outstanding debts. This is designed to protect the assets of the person who has gone into insolvency and ensure a fair distribution amongst all of the outstanding creditors.

 

I would be inclined to write to metropolitan in your husbands name stating that you are in no position to discus financial matters with them and refer them to the official receiver for all further correspondence.

 

Confirm you will not respond to any further communication and you will be reporting them to the FSA for their harassment to date and to the police if they continue the harassment.

 

Here's some information on harassment for you;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/37006-harassment-telephone-response-letter.html

 

And here's an example of the kind of tone of letter I used with Metro :rolleyes:;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/125577-metropolitan-collection-services-action.html

 

Keep us posted how your getting on or just shout if you need to know anything else :).

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hiya lloydie and welcome to the HSBC forum :)

 

Here's the step by step guide on claiming back your charges.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

 

Have a read through it and come back with any questions you have, its a good idea to start your own thread so all of the advice you get is in one place and anyone reading through can see where you are and give the advice you need :)

 

Good luck

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Just to add to what Johnny has said, if the debt was a loan (I think credit cards fall into this too) and you were under 18 it raises even more questions because "minors" arnt allowed to borrow money.

 

If this is the case however it may answer the question why the debt collectors keep passing it back to HSBC... when they discover how old you were and the contract isnt worth the paper its written on.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...