Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor Lowell CCJ - old Barclaycard debt - i moved abroad and didn't tell..Anyone got a CCJ removed?


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

First time poster - just found this great resource!  Just looking for a bit of help and advice really.

 

My situation is as follows: 

I moved from UK to UAE back in 2016. I thought I had cleared everything up before I left, but there's always something to come and bite you. I have an unpaid debt for a credit card, totalling just over £800. In May 2019 the company got a CCJ against me for the unpaid debt. I returned to the UK in June last year, and moved into rented accommodation - nothing was said at the time about a CCJ against me from the rental company. 

 

Now. a year later, and I am looking to move from my current accommodation (moving from city to country) and I was told about a week ago that I couldn't rent the house I wanted because of the CCJ.  This is the first time I was aware of its presence.  In the last year, it hasn't stopped me renting my first house, getting a new credit card, or leasing a new car, and I have never been as much as a day late with my rent.

 

From what I have read so far, I have grounds to ask for the CCJ to be removed in that

a) I was out of the country

b)never received any sort of notice of this and

c) had no chance to enter a defence against the CCJ.

 

I don't dispute the debt, and am able to pay it in full - but if I do so the CCJ will still remain on my file and be seen by other prospective landlords, so I really need to get it removed.

 

Does anyone know if this is possible?

 

Thanks all,

Steve

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you know the claimant and the details that are in the particulars of claim?

when did you take the card out?

and when did you last pay/use the card?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the reply.

 

yes, I know the details from the Registry Trust and my credit file (now I’ve checked it!). Can’t remember when I took the card out, but it was last used end of 2015/ start 2016 ( I moved out of UK March 2016)

Link to post
Share on other sites

well tell us then.:frusty:

 

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry!  I'm new to this!

 

The card was a Barclaycard, but the debt has been taken over by Lowell Financial.  The CCJ was issued in May 2019, 3 years after I had left the country.  Not sure what other details you require, but this is pretty much all I know right now.

 

As I say, I don't really have an issue with the debt, I can sort that, but its the CCJ that is having such a detrimental effect, so I'd just like to know if others have had any joy in getting them quashed, and if so, on what grounds.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm.. reasonably rare for lowells to buy an old BC debt. BC enforceable credit agreements are very rarely produced had you the chance to defend this, you most probably would have won.... but sadly that ship has sailed as a method of set aside. the fact a default roboclaim judgement has been granted where no human checks anything trumps that.

 

bottom line there a 2 chances to get the CCJ off your file...neither of which might ever work.

 

1. contact lowells and offer to pay the full amount IF they remove the CCJ from your records pleading that it will destroy your future in many ways. list them etc etc lay it on thick to make them do a goodwill gesture for you.

 

2. contact lowells with proof you were resident abroad at the time of the claim and had no idea this could happen, (though it is allowed sadly..re last known address) and ask if they will set aside the judgement FOC to you to give you the chance to defend the claim ...thus removing the CCJ.

 

3. you could pay £255 and raise an N244 set aside yourself but TBH as it stands i can't see a valid defence for the debt...you ran away..no excuses. unless there was a dispute or something with BC that made you think it's not owed.

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor Lowell CCJ - old Barclaycard debt - i moved abroad and didn't tell..Anyone got a CCJ removed?

I suppose you could query the Default notice, perhaps if you were having your mail forwarded, you could contend you did not receive one.

 

If you didn't send a DN they shouldn't have enforced. Ask them for a copy and when the Section 87 Default notice was sent.

 

I dont know what the success rate for claiming no DN is these days on a set aside application?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, mail wasn’t forwarded - this was 3 years after I had left UK, my house had been sold, all accounts closed as far as I knew.  Mail was forwarded for first 6 months, not 3 years.

 

who do I ask for the S.87 notice, the court or the creditor? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

paperwork wriggles sailed upon default judgement.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx would know, this. Once they were an easy win.  

 

The procedure would be to ask the creditor for a a copy of the Default notice and a notice of assignment, they would have had to be send both before selling the debt, or do a request under GDMPR  and see what turns turns up.

 

Fuel for a set-aside application.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

not for a set aside application.

the default ccj is enforcement , no one now needs to prove they had anything enforceable by way of paperwork now.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

On pre 2007 agreements?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...