VCS/ELMS Spy car 2*PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform for 1 of them - 'NO STOPPING' BP Station East Midlands airport

[brassnecked]

its a shame youpaid the first one, but if it goes against them thee might be other routes to hit them.

[brassnecked]

I would go with 2 and 3, and maybe  was not a parking incident, as I was not parked or stopped  in contravention of any rule.

Just let the others have a quick look, but with Simple Simon, Less is always More at this point

[brassnecked]

No do not counterclaim, that can open up a whole world of pain.  And if you lose the costs will be shocking.

[brassnecked]

Mediation is no use in these cases they assume you owe something so the PPC will want something, should always say No to Mediation, you either owe it or not, not pretend its the Old bazaar in Cairo and haggle over what you are going to pay the fleecer's.

[brassnecked]

Nutshell is as access roads are covered by Byelaws, and stopping is prohibited, a Parking Event cannot be constructed out of a prohibition, stopping is a Breach of a ByeLaw, so cannot give rise to a Civcil Contract to breach. however, as FTM Dave says study it well

[brassnecked]

Nice GDPR claim in there when Simon is sent packing with that use of CCTV on his admission

 

[brassnecked]

Looks good FTMDave, the expansion of the byelaws argument by illustrating how a breach of byelaw cannot lead to a parking event VCS can claim on would be good.  Incidentally, if this is chucked out, would the invoice paid be reclaimable, as like the second one just thrown out is void and unconscionable, so try to reclaim it?  Thoughts DX FTM?

[brassnecked]

Good point lookedinforinfo, needs incorporating in the WS as is fatal to Simon''s case.

[brassnecked]

The GDPR route likely best way, easier to get the redress that way, and mention the first case that was paid as obviously constituting a breach along with Invoice two perhaps.  Main thing is to see Simon off with the current claim

[brassnecked]

Stopping in a restricted zone can never be a Parking Event, as its a prohibition, so cannot give rise to a contract to breach, More CTRL C CTRL V in there, misinterpretation of Beavis again

[brassnecked]

Sadly was Judge lottery, but at least another DJ might now be looking more closely at Simon's roboclaims.

[brassnecked]

Need to look at S43 Companies Act then to see where it can apply in Airport cases, in fact any case regarding ownership and/or right to do things. like sue .