Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

NHS employee difficulty with covid testing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1254 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, honeybee13 said:

Hi. I suppose it depends on which of the Covid tests her employer wants your friend to have.

 

Who are the infection prevention team please?

 

HB

 

 

 

I suspect  that linzie means the Infection Control team at her friend's employer - a NHS trust from the thread title.  (Don't worry HB - you can't be expected to guess the right answer if the OP won't tell you!  Not everybody would know what an Infection control team was).

 

linzie - I'm sure your friend's employer can dictate precisely whatever test will satisfy them and that she has no "right" to a home test.  Her employer is, after all, a NHS trust, and I think they will probably know what they are doing.

 

Also, as a back-sufferer myself and a former NHS manager (whose job was once to monitor levels of staff sickness), I'm absolutely astounded that her physio has suggested 12 days(!) of bed rest.  The current advice as I understand it (unless you have a severe medical issue) is to have no more than two or three days bed rest and to try to resume normal activity ASAP.  If the physio thinks your friend won't be able to attend a testing appointment in 12 days time, I'm surprised they haven't referred them for urgent investigation (eg MRI).

 

So no, I don't think your friend can insist on being tested at home.  Best all round to do what their NHS employer tells them.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea if there are more than one test or not - but it's quite possible that there are, and it's quite possible that results come back within different timescales.

 

Why doesn't your friend simply call the Infection Control (or whatever) Department at her employing trust and explain her concerns?  If your friend is already self-isolating because they've been in contact with someone who is covid positive, I'm not sure what their particular worry is, unless your friend (or someone they live with) is shielding or is otherwise vulnerable?

 

Unless there is good reason for your friend's concern, I think their employer may well be justified in concluding that their position on this is unreasonable.  After all, is it reasonable to refuse being tested in your own home by a professional nurse who is trained in infection control, and infection control is basically all that his or her job is about (even in non-Covid times)?  I'm sure healthcare staff are amongst the most regularly tested people in the country and I'd have thought you were no more likely to be infected by an NHS nurse than by some random person you met shopping.

 

Does the nurse actually even have to come into your friend's home?  Can't it be done at the front door without breaching social distancing rules?  eg  Visiting nurse rings door bell, puts test kit on doorstep and steps back 2m+.  Friend opens door, picks up kit and self-administers test.  Returns completed test to doorstep, retreats and closes door, nurse advances and picks up kit.  Simples!  My wife had to have an operation in August and had to visit a test centre three days prior to admission.  She basically went through the same process I've just described except it was in her car and through the car window. I can't believe a NHS Infection Control Dept won't have developed a similarly safe protocol for doing this.

 

I don't know, but it is quite possible that if you are not showing symptoms you should not be getting tested at a test centre.  There was a lot of publicity a couple of months ago about people who were not showing symptoms overwhelming test centres and blocking the testing of people who were showing symptoms.

 

Also, as your friend is a NHS employee, her employer trust may consider that it owes a duty of care to its patients to ensure that the right person is being tested, a duty which they might feel cannot be fulfilled with a home test.

 

What I've said above is just what seems like common sense to me.  I'm not an expert in employment law and it might well be that your friend is within their rights to refuse to be tested at home.  But I doubt that that would be conducive to a longer term good relationship with their employer.

 

Just tell your friend to ring up infection control and talk to them.  I worked as a manager in the NHS for 25 years and I'd be among the first to agree that the NHS is at the centre of a lot of cockups, but most of them could be avoided if people simply talked to each other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.  This site suggests that you can't get a "free" test done at a test centre unless you have symptoms.  I suspect that as your friend's hospital can do the test themselves, they will be reluctant to pay for anybody else to do it

 

https://www.gov.uk/get-coronavirus-test

 

However, you'll notice a section headed "If you're going into hospital".  Why doesn't your friend ask if she can use the same test process as for people about to be admitted to hospital?

 

As I say unless he/she talks to their employing trust about the available options they won't resolve this.  And no matter what they ask for they may still have to end up with a nurse testing them in their home  (EDIT:  And run the risk of being labelled "awkward")

Edited by Manxman in exile
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...