Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Please will you repost your images in one single multipage PDF file – the right way round et cetera.  
    • And just to reiterate – I'm sorry if the message above sounds a bit harsh. We have to get the message out to other people who visit this thread as well. I realise that you are having a difficult time and we will do our best to help you, of course
    • The last photo shows the overflow carpark looking at the block which our room was located. When we got out of the car my partner thought that the building was for staff accommodation.  The unsecured bedroom window opened onto this car park.
    • Also I see that you are doing a lot of this on the telephone – and without any written confirmation. This is a big mistake. You need to start taking this matter seriously and so everything should go in writing. If you have telephone calls then they should normally be recorded. Read our customer services guide. You should make notes about every telephone call and then you should send an email to your telephone correspondence confirming what they have said or what they have agreed. It is important that you keep detailed paper trails here. Of course we may be jumping the gun and maybe big motoring world will step up to the mark – but I'm afraid that they have a lousy reputation has you have seen and so you need to start practising survival techniques and protecting yourself. You say for instance in your letter of rejection that the mechanic told you on the telephone that the gearbox needed replacing. Do you have any other evidence of this conversation? This is going to sound a bit harsh – but other people will be visiting this thread as well for their own purposes. You conducted their research about this company before you bought the vehicle. You now are fully aware that this is a company which can be very difficult to deal with and causes a lot of problems for many of their customers and yet you are still taking a telephone/verbal approach. Do I need to say any more? Also one of the documents you put up is an email exchange but it is not clear who is writing to who or what dates. If you showed this email to somebody in a pub they would be asking lots of questions about who sent the first message, who sent the second message, what dates were they sent et cetera. Please think about this before you post things. Please can you clarify the details of that email exchange. Please will you present the information carefully. We are all volunteers here and we have to rely on you to do the spadework
    • I told the DM that the room was not acceptable because of the reasons already mentioned. He informed me that they were full that night and that they could move me to the room next door (would not solve my problem with the rooms location). Told the DM that I could not stay in the room provided for the night so left no option but to leave. DM did not reply and I walked out.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

backdoor CCJ Aktiv Kaptial - set aside - whats next?


batty69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1434 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Damm it didnt send! will wait till I get to 20 post, only 2 more to go, all will become clear!

 

The people involved monitor this forum quite extensively and I have seen how underhand they can be for myself in the way they have handled my case.

 

I'm not taking any chances.

However suffice to say,

they are a well know company on this forum,

who has done this before.

 

Fortunately I have the ear of a cabinet minister who's willing to take this up once it's resolved (they are not allowed to involved in any ongoing legal disputes)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn! didnt send, I need 30 to send to you, 20 to mod.

 

Trust me I will, I think when the full facts are revealed there is a good chance of this DCA being stripped of their licence.

 

Yes a solictor is involved, we were planning to take action against these people ourselves.

 

Problem is, he's gone away on hols for a fortnight, this then dropped through the door earlier this week and I have to file early next week.

 

Am desperately trying to get hold of him!

 

Hopes this throws some light on my earlier posts,

because I need to either delay or get away with handing over the bare minimum of my case till I can get hold of him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We know from experience that a single unfortunate ‘admin error’ will not see a debt buyer or DCA stripped of its licence. That’s wishful thinking.

 

Is this your solicitor or theirs? If it’s theirs and he knows what’s going on, the SRA should be your next stop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's mine, as we were planning to go either fast track or multi-track with the counter claim.

 

I found a recent similiar case to mine where this has happened, the claimant settled out of court.

 

Also there is another company involved who are sort of off the radar, who are doing things this company would never risk in their own name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh yes, the old "Admin Error" excuse, as we know they are not admin errors.

 

Fortunately they are leaving a big paper trail in my case, that will show it is nothing of the sort.

 

However if said DCA gets wind of what's coming their way, they are going to start covering their arses so they can claim the "Admin Error" excuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Calling Andy,

can you point me in the direction of a sample particularised defence somewhere?

 

I want to make sure I'm getting the format correct,

 

i.e. not too little info, but not too detailed either.

i.m onto the counter claim part of my defence.

 

how much detail do I need ?

 

is it brief like a POC, particularised POC or Detailed (i.e. cite how, what and why the damages I have claimed for have occured)

 

Andy I've had a good trawl around the forum to find the nearest case to mine in terms of procedure (rather than the case matter) and the closest I can find is this thread which you have been helping on.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?348133-Moved-and-received-CCJ-Help-please/page1

 

on page 4 of the thread, post 67 the posters states

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?348133-Moved-and-received-CCJ-Help-please/page4

 

1. Judgement be set asidelink3.gif

 

2. The defendant do file defence by 4.oopm on 20th July 2012

 

the parallel to my case is that these were the orders that have been given in my case after my set aside, the only difference is that the judge has split these over two orders.

 

In the thread in question, which I am now following religously as it looks like it's going to go down somewhat a similiar path. is that,

 

a) Maybelate wasn't advised to put in a particularised defence at this point

b) After sending in the brief defence, an AQ was sent out and the case started following the "normal" path.

 

I'm a bit confused as this seems a bit contrary to what I have been advised here, what am I missing ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every claim every defence every scenario is unique batty...there are no parallels or sample particularised defences.It all starts at the Particulars of claim.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate that,

just trying to get a sense of what I need to get in.

 

I have gone for a "semi-particularised" in that I have used the standard defences on here regarding documentation (where they are missing in my case).

 

Plus added a few other defences which are particular to my case,

 

I'm not accused of adding them later.

 

But are being deficient on citing my evidence till the exchange of witness statements and documents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the best approach to adopt never be to particularised...keep your options open.Cast doubt and open the claimant along the process.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually what I meant by "Sample Particularised Defence" is the format, e.g. where do you put the date,

do I need to quote case no.,

do I need to make a declaration of truth.

 

what I mean is, not the content, obviously the content is unique to each case, but the format.

 

e.g. when I did my ws for set aside a solicitor contact of mine gave me a template to work from but the details were totally irrevelant to my case (wasn't even a DCA/debt case)

 

I dont want my the defence thrown out because I didn't follow something procedural, like forgetting to quote the case number!

Link to post
Share on other sites

IN THE XXX COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO: XXXXXX

 

Claimant

Nasty Bank

 

 

V

 

Defendant

Batty

 

DEFENCE

 

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

 

Statement of Truth

 

Dated xxxxx

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Batty you will submit a defence & PT20 Counter Claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...