CCJ Merligen/Moriarty Law - old flow energy debt.

[dx100uk]

yep a classic stunt for M/M to do, lots here already, backdoor CCJ on an old flow energy debt, with everything filed to the old address the bills were from.?

 

2 things..

ring northants bulk tomorrow and ask for a copy of the CLAIMFORM by email pdf.

. if they don't have it ask them to read out the particulars of claim box text ....RECORD THE CALL.

also ask them the address the claimform was sent too.

 

then look thru your old letters and findout if you ever gave flow energy your correct and present address ?

as it's always amazing how everything M/M do is sent elsewhere but magically when it comes down to requesting a default court judgement they always quote them the correct address to send it too..funny that eh? almost as if they did it on purpose..no never be that sneaky would a dca or their mates....

 

should be easy to set this aside once we have the details.

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

did you ring northants bulk?

no good guessing till we get the truth of what is on the claimform POC and the address it was sent too..

[dx100uk]

record the call ask the questions as post 2

[dx100uk]

[dx100uk]

oh and it's the usual M/M one too.. 

1 hour ago, buxs said:

THE DEFENDANT OWES THE CLAIMANT

wrong!

I bet the claimant is Merligen on the judgement?

 

so tell me...how does a debt buyer supply you with gas/electric??...

[dx100uk]

so in your previous letters have you a 'letter of claim' from moriarty law then?

 

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

where is the letter of claim that Moriarty must send 30 days before requesting northants bulk raise a court claim against you upon the claimants behalf?

have you got it?

or is the letter you mention here the ONLY other communication you have?

 

what letter from whom do you have and their dates?

why not scan them up 

read upload CAREFULLY use ONE multipage PDF only!!

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

that's a very misleading letter

as it shows the originator as flow energy but does say who moriarty's client are ,

but ofcourse we know its merlingen as they are the claimant listed on the judgement ccj.

 

so:

no pre action protocol 'letter of claim' issued by moriarty - so have broken the PAP guidelines.

no claimform pack from northants bulk court - so you were removed from the opportunity to defend.

seriously in dispute before debt sale to merlingen

 

I think that's got everything for a seta side

let andyorch check things 1st mind.

 

 

 

[dx100uk]

defence not defense.

 

they have to date not provided any paperwork as it was a backdoor CCJ.

that removed your right to defend the claim

 

it being in serious dispute, going to the ombs service etc etc and most probably not correctly billed is a reasonable basic defence.