Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Auxillis advice needed after bad repair and car left cover in damp and mold


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1614 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi thanks for the advice.

Last night I thought I am fully com and covered for damages .

So I called hastings today and said I want to make a new claim for water damages to my car.

Well that kicked up a storm has  hastings won't let me start a new claim.

But are now looking to take my car back and send it to another garage and stop auxillis having anything to do with it.

Hopefully tomorrow I will hear from hastings but I won't hold my breath.

I am still going to the omnibusman with hastings and auxillis no matter what the outcome.

They moan about crash for cash claims but auxillis are worse that them people.

And until companies like them are stopped insurance with remain high.

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you know that the water damage appears to have been caused by the agent of Hasting, it seems senseless to make a new insurance claim because this will simply impact on your claims record. This seems to be a clear case of Hasting responsibility and a case of breach of contract or negligence of their agent

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you have started coming to us for advice, I don't think it's very wise for you to start doing things on your own without at least consulting with the people on this forum who have some experience. We don't necessarily have all the right answers but you should at least get other opinions before you start going it alone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you and I am not going it alone.

Hopefully hasting have and will accept responsibility.  But even if they do and it gets sorted I have stated the omnibusman off with hastings and as soon as auxillis give me a final response I will take them to the ombudsman

 

The garage are at fault for the repairs and damage. 

But right now I want my car taken of auxillis and the garage and taken to another company .

With everything that has happened between auxillis and acorn assessors .

 

 

Hastings are finally saying they have reopened my claim and the handler will be in touch to arrange the repairs.

Again all recorded.

 

But I am driving down to the yard my car is in to see if the cars still there .

If it's been covered up or left in the rain.

Lucky the car can be seen from the rd and I will be taking more photos if it is.

Thanks again once I hear from hastings I will update it on here.

I don't agree with the way it's been dealt with and fully intend to share everything so others are aware of what not only hastings but other big insurance companies do by using company's like auxillis.

 

I would even go so far as to ask these compare sites to add the details of the accident claims companies to the info on their sites so people have the choice when buying there insurance of not having to deal with companies like auxiliary. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not quite sure if you are saying that you have already started a complaint with the ombudsman. Although we don't have any faith in the ombudsman here, it would be a good idea to start something of straightaway in respect of both companies – in order at the very least to get them to focus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

8Hi well the car was delivered on a flat back non running flat tyre drivers side window not working  1 inch of water on the passengers floor.

 

I had a inspection done over the weekend that has highlighted even more bad repairs. 

When the inspector called tech reports they stated that there was a drivers report and it said when he opened the door water fell on the floor and on the seat.

 

Now I have all the photos of the drivers report and no report .

No photos of the alleged wet seat.

Apparently when he drove the car his bum was wet from the seat.

I have Tryed and Tryed to get this report but they are delaying it.

 

They are blaming the water and mould on the fact I would not accept my car back with bad repairs.

 

My inspection as highlighted even more mistakes.

 

I will add a link to the video and if needed I will remove it .

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/e0lur4ijshx13qe/Car being retuned.mp4?dl=0

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there's been a bit of a break in this so I've rather lost the plot.

Trying to refresh my memory by scanning through the thread, it seems to me that instead of dealing with it directly, Hastings have appointed an agent and the whole thing has gone to worms so that your car is in much worse condition than it was just after the accident.

You now have possession of the car I gather. You are still driving a hire vehicle.

Is anybody screaming for the return of the hire vehicle?

What is the latest situation in terms of what Hastings have said or their agent has said? Did you start an ombudsman complaint?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hastings are investigating it and we are waiting on the drivers report from the garage.

And photos of the leak they claim the car had.

 

Although it was picked up on the 26th of September and we had no rain from the 22nd till the 30th.

 

I still. Have the hire calm I called auxillis friday after the car came back ask about the hire car going back and was told they would be in touch .

I then emailed hastings stating that I had called auxillis and that I was told they would be in contact to collect the car.

 

I suspect that they will try denied the call and charge me for the hire.

 

I also had the rac out when it was delivered he got it started but said it's not fit for use I have that report.

 

At the weekend I had it inspected again myself and it's highlighted more issues with the repair .

cut rubber seals on the door just pushed back on not replaced

lumps under the paint 

Still waiting in the report but loads more issues .

 

 

 

Sorry both auxillis and hastings I bo2 have the omnibusman involved but it's just started

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should get two independent quotations for the repair work. This means that you should get two independent experts to inspect the car, to detail exactly what is wrong, what needs doing and to give you a quote for repairs.
It doesn't seem to me that you have so far obtained any definitive statement as to the condition of the car or the value of any claim.

It seems to me that  is an essential next step.
 

You might also tell us what is your complaint against Hastings? Have you done this by letter?

Also I see that you have been talking about phone calls and you are worried that Auxillis might deny the fact that they were giving you the hire for free. Aren't you recording your calls?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...