Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Trader of bespoke furnishings problem with customer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1752 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Do you make blinds?

What product are we talking about?

And what faults the customers thinks are there?

I worked with wood, so i know what you mean that something that it's an indication of a good job can be seen by the ignorant eye as a defect.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds like the ever unhappy customer. 

I had a couple in my days and on one occasion I cleared the site within half hour and left a kitchen extension half done.

I lost a couple of grand on that project, but I was glad to go with all my team to a better job with a more reasonable customer. 

The woman ended up begging us to go back because nobody in the area would deal with her after we spread the news around local pubs.

So, my advice is: if you can walk away and cut your losses, do it, otherwise she will make your life a misery.

Tell her to buy her curtains and blinds from argos, they have a no quibble refund policy, so she can take the all lot back in a continuous cycle and keep moaning forever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be impressed by the fact he's a lawyer. 

They very rarely sue someone because they know the risks and hours involved in the process. 

My bet is that short of doing all the work for free or at cost price, she'll complain.

It's typical of people who come from squalid backgrounds and meet some money along their way.

They know it all and nothing is good enough for their superior standards.

They want top quality at cheap prices and they love being the customer who is always right.

In reality they're still the same people who had to search food from rubbish and use bushes as toilets.

I put them in their place a lot of times when i was at the beginning,  then i learned to spot the trouble makers and avoid them.

I remember one in particular who threatened to sue me because I refused to give him a quote. 

He was convinced that I had no right to refuse his custom and insisted on many occasions that I visited his house for a quote.

He eventually stopped calling but then 12 months later he called again because his compatriot contractor had messed things up and the extension had been failed by the council.

My answer: "pay peanuts, get monkeys"

I gave him a 45k quote there and then on the phone, to demolish and start again: he never called again.

Your case is difficult because you have already done a lot of the work.

The risk of starting negotiations is that they'll feel you are at fault, so if you do that, make sure you let them know that you are doing it because you don't want them as your customers.

As soon as you give them an inch they'll take a full mile.

One more thing: if you have any contact with them, face to face or phone, record it; their other trick is to say that you agreed to something or that you threatened them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...