Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
    • Sorry my redactions made it harder dx. Tick dates are 11/12/2014
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

@curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK refused to honour purchase


Irt8787
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1602 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi I am new to the forum. 

 

Saw a new 2019 MacBook Pro 15 for sale on Currys eBay store for £1808 which was below usual selling price (apple RRP £2349). Ebay was running a promotion that weekend which gave me another £100 off with code. bought and paid with credit card. received order confirmation, invoice and despatch info all showing correct details.

 

however I received a 2019 MacBook Pro 13 (RRP £1949) 2 days later which wasn’t what I paid for. 

 

Contacted Currys customer service who told me that they made a mistake on their eBay listing and description. their internal system showed item purchased to be MacBook Pro 13 and they couldn’t honour the sale of MacBook Pro 15. they said if I don’t want to keep it then I could return the MacBook Pro 13 for refund. 

 

I want the sale to be honoured and wonder if it is justified to insist on getting my exchange. It has been 4 days since the delivery, I have spent a lot of time with team knowhow over the phone, and started a complaint through Resolver. They wouldn’t bulge. 

 

Currys eBay store has somehow changed the details on the original listing and on my eBay purchase now showed MacBook Pro 13. 

 

Would really appreciate any input at all. Feel like I have reached a dead end. Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I still have the evidence in my original order details, as well as the electronic invoice from Currys. 

 

I started a complaint through Resolver so I have all the correspondences to back up my story.  

They insisted that I purchased a MacBook Pro 13 according to the information on their internal system.

They have repeatedly offered for me to return the item for full refund, and is adamant that they could not honour an exchange due to the price difference between MacBook Pro 13 and 15.

 

I wrote to Citizens advice through email.

They gave me some generic advice and said they will refer my case to trading standards, but I’m unsure how helpful that will be.

 

can you provide further advice on how to pursue this through legal action?

I am just wondering how time consuming this will be.

 

thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for taking time to advise me regarding the matter. I made the purchase on 15th June and delivery was 17th June.

 

what I want to be certain is whether I have a case here. Email correspondences with Currys made me wonder if I am being unreasonable, as they kept saying they sold me a MacBook Pro 13 according to their internal system. I did speak to them twice on the phone, on the second time as I insisted I want an exchange, team knowhow said they will refer my case to head office. I doubt this has happened.

 

Did not record my tel call but have multiple email correspondences through Resolver. They said their position is clear that they would not exchange and that I can return item for refund.

 

Can they defend themselves with SOGA that they made an error and therefore do not have to honour the purchase? Usually I would have given up and send it back, but as I am on annual leave I have more time to pursue this.

 

I will probably start drafting the letter before action. And I gather I need to follow through with letter of claim if they still refuse to bulge? I am a bit nervous as I have never done this before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I will send out the letter before action tomorrow. 

 

One last thing is obviously I do not want to keep the incorrect item and there is a timeframe to return this for full refund (30 days according to Currys return policy). I think I need to keep the incorrect item if I want to pursue this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case I will keep the item for now. Worst case scenario I will sell it on eBay.

 

the claim fees isn’t an issue, I am more nervous about having to turn up in court for hearing. Not very good with things like that. 

 

I guess I am just frustrated as I thought I found a good deal from eBay Currys but ended up in all this mess. It is interesting to see Currys being so firm as other retailers might have honoured this on good will. Maybe the loss from selling at significantly below RRP is too much for them.

 

I will update if I receive a response to LBA which doesn’t seem likely to happen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I will open a return via eBay stating incorrect item and then send it back? 

Can I still send the LBA even though I have returned the item? Would they not just refund me and then close the case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BankFodder said:

Send the letter before action under separate cover. Do not send it with the returned laptop. You must send the letter before action to the Currys head office.

Is this LBA acceptable?

Quote

DSG Retail Limited

1 Portal Way

North Acton

London

W3 6RS

 

21 June 2019

 

Letter before court claim

 

Dear DSG Retail Limited,

 

Re: 2019 Macbook Pro 15

eBay auction reference number xxxxxxx

Invoice number xxxxxxxxxx

 

I am writing regarding the 2019 MacBook Pro 15 which I bought from your eBay store on 15th June 2019. You listed the item at £1808 which I promptly paid for with credit card after purchase (paid amount of £1708 with £100 off eBay code). However on the 17th June 2019 you delivered 2019 MacBook Pro 13, a different model with lower value in RRP.

 

I have spoken to your customer service over the phone on 2 occasions, and sent you multiple email correspondences via eBay as well as Resolver website. You insisted your internal system showed that I purchased a 2019 MacBook Pro 13, despite the evidence from my order confirmation and invoice saying otherwise.

 

I am once again requesting that you honour our sale agreement and an exchange being made on the grounds that the goods did not match their description under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. I enclose a copy of the proof of purchase. I have initiated a return of the incorrect item via eBay and this should not be taken to mean anything other than that I am divesting myself of the responsibility for it.

 

I would like a reply as soon as possible so that I know you have received this letter. If I do not receive a satisfactory response from you within 14 days of the date of this letter, I intend to issue proceedings against you in the county court without further notice. I will be pursuing the full non-promotional price of the item, but I will alternatively accept delivery of the laptop which I originally agreed to buy.

 

I refer you to the Practice Direction on pre-action conduct under the Civil Procedure Rules, and in particular to paragraph 13-16 which sets out the sanctions the court may impose if you fail to comply with the Practice Direction.

 

I look forward to your acknowledgement.

 

Yours sincerely
 

Name

 

Enc: copy of proof of purchase

Invoice.PDF

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK refused to honour purchase
1 hour ago, BankFodder said:

Add the two reference numbers I have suggested. It's fine.

thanks

 

7 hours ago, stu007 said:

Hi

 

Don't just open a return via ebay also complaint to both ebay & paypal about sellers actions.

 

Something to remember is the seller listed that as a specific item which you then purchased and paid for then seller corrected the details after, this will all be logged on ebays servers so ebay should have a record of when this items description was changed/updated.

 

Do you know how long the item had been listed on ebay for with the original description (date & time) before the seller changed the description (date & time)? (if not I would ask ebay)

not sure how that works. i can’t find anywhere on ebay site to complain about seller. 

 

i watched the MBP 15 for a few days before purchase and currys was listing the MBP 15 at £1949 during the period and the price lowered to £1808 for a few hours on the day I purchased it. it disappeared after and then came back on in new listing at full RRP; original listing was changed to MBP 13 on the 17th I think

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have initiated return via ebay stating that it was incorrect item.

currys provided an automatic returns label (rm tracked 48) which is clearly insufficient for high value item.

i have contacted them and asked for an appropriate return labels

Link to post
Share on other sites

so i am taking all the right steps then. i have initiated returns, i will send out the LBA and wait for response, and then take them to small claims lastly if they refuse an exchange

 

the defence they will use is probably that their internal sku showed i bought a mbp13 and they don’t have to honour an honest pricing/listing error

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it will be DSG retail limited as that’s the name on my invoice. 

 

i am not sure what to write on claim particulars now. do i claim for full RRP of macbook pro 15 & 8% interests?

what if they refund me for the mbp 13, does that change what i claim for then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 24/06/2019 at 14:55, Andyorch said:

thank you

 

for the claim particulars what ebay auction reference number should I be using? is it the order number on my order confirmation email from eBay, or is it the eBay order reference number on Currys paper invoice? on the ebay email obviously the item was a MBP 15, on Currys paper invoice the item was MBP 13. do they matter?

 

ps there is no order number on the electronic invoice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ebay generated their own number for orders - in my order confirmation email it was 05-03481-54910. currys has their own reference number which was EBY1000XXXXXX, and there was an invoice number on electronic invoice. include them all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so my claim particulars is this:

 

Quote

The defendant company advertised a laptop computer Apple Macbook Pro 15'' with Touchbar, 256GB SSD, Space Grey (2019) on an eBay auction: eBay order number 05-03481-54910, Currys PC World order reference EBY1000248637, Invoice number 1342689 for a promotional price of £1808 (total paid £1708 with eBay voucher code). The claimant succeeded at the auction and paid the asking price. The defendant then sent a different model computer of a lower value. The defendant refuses to supply the contractual goods. The claimant seeks £2349 being the full value of the advertised item plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984 or else specific performance of the contract.

 

there is still one line remaining so more details can be added 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the full retail price was Apple's retail price. the item was listed at £1808 on ebay for Buy It Now but Currys did not mention the rrp in the listing or say it was on offer. so maybe we cant use the wordings currys made it clear what the rrp was

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a slight amendment myself. i am claiming for difference in price (£2349 - £1708)     *not sure about the amount that I should claim. item sold for £1808. the amount that I actually paid was £1708 as ebay code made the price £100 cheaper

 

current draft:

 

Quote

The defendant company advertised a laptop computer Apple MacBook Pro 15'' with Touchbar,256GB SSD,Space Grey(2019) on an eBay auction order number 05-03481-54910,Currys PC World order reference EBY1000248637,invoice number 1342689.The full retail price is £2349 but it was on offer for a promotional price of £1808.The claimant succeeded at the auction and paid the asking price.The defendant then sent a different model computer of a lower value.The defendant refuses to supply the contractual goods. The defendant has refunded on return of incorrect item. The claimant seeks £641 being the difference in full value of the advertised item plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984 or else specific performance of the contract.

 

Edited by Irt8787
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fits in until the word ‘refunded’.

The underlined sentence - do you meant ‘refuse to supply the promotional computer agreed and paid for in contract’

 

if I can’t include the eBay voucher code then I will be claiming £541 instead.  The amount covered by the voucher code wasn’t refunded and cannot be claimed in monetary value according to ebay terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 

The Defendant advertised a laptop computer 
MacBook Pro 15”, with Touchbar,256GB SSD,Space 
Grey(2019)on an eBay auction order 
no.05-03481-54910,Currys PC World 
ref.EBY1000248637,invoice no.1342689.The full 
RRP is £2349 but the defendant offered it for 
a promotional price of £1808.Claimant
succeeded at the auction and paid the asking 
promotional price of £1708 plus £100 voucher, now expired.Defendant sent a 
lower spec model computer.Defendant refuses 
to supply the contractual goods.Claimant has
returned the incorrect item and been refunded 
£1708 but defendant continues to refuse to supply the 
promotional computer agreed and paid for in 
the contract.Claimant seeks £ 641: being the 
difference between the sum refunded and the 
full value contracted-for item or else  
specific performance of the contract.

 

 

 

Fits nicely. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...