Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx, with link having multiple accounts for me, I didn’t want to be a pushover in the first one ideally.. hearing is 3rd June, WS’s to be exchanged by 6th may 
    • he may be using a different name but cars and vans/vans and cars it’s all the same Gerard Bird/Gerry Bird/G Bird aka Gurdip Singh Virdi He is still doing the same thing, operating from the same premises at 101a Longford, I’m guessing during Covid they got the great idea to rip people off remotely and charge people for the pleasure. they now deliver cars that are shocking quality and refuse to even accept the issues you find. Then Gaslight you into thinking your the problem and call you an idiot for buying a used car instead of a new one. Buyers beware this thread is vitally important     
    • Changes to China's state secrets law requires internet firms to monitor information shared by users.View the full article
    • The only way to verify whether there is any financial reward for the management is seeing the agreement. That would be required during disclosure IF court proceedings went ahead... Unless you could bring pressure to bear and get a copy?
    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

braveheart1 v clydesdale bank(scotland)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

good luck dude ....hopefully you wont need it - I lodged mine a few weeks ago and the clerk told me that over 300 people had claimed against them in that particular court - they haven't defended a single one to date !

Learned fools speak their nonsense in better language than the unlearned, but they are still fools and it is still nonsense !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck mate, I'm going to complain to the FOS about the obstructive behaviour first to see what happens, then i'll do the court thing.

Been screwed by banks all my life, it's payback time!!!!

 

OK as I seem to be handing out advice here I guess I had better add a disclaimer to my signature, Caro, hope you don't mind but I nicked yours.

 

Advice & opinions given by Dread are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

;) hope this helps every one about to lodge papers in scottish courts I got this letter from court clerk very helpful chap , he wouldn`t accept the template for particulars of claim and gave me this one out of his folder hopefully this will save everyone a double trip to court. going today to lodge ammened documentation .will keep u posted thanks again to everyone

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

 

1. The Pursuer has an account (account number“") with the Defender which was opened on or around (date account opened )

 

2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defender debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Pursuer and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Pursuer understands that the Defender contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Pursuer.

 

3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.

 

4. The Pursuer contends that:

 

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defender; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defender in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Pursuer; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defender which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defender to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

 

5. The Pursuer being entitled to reimbursement of the Defenders charges,decree as craved should be granted with expenses.

6. The Defender operates from ( name&address of bank). The Pursuer resides at (address) and has been domiciled there for three months immediately preceding this action. The Pursuer entered into a consumer contract with the defender.This court accordingly has jurisdiction.

(Civil Judgement and Jurisdiction Act 1982,Section 41 and Schedule 8 Rule 3 )

Link to post
Share on other sites

:mad: hi there went to court this afternoon papers still not right a few brackets in the wrong places on particulars of claim letter,girl again very helpful I ammended letter I posted in forum earlier but I am unsure yet as to the wording she highlighted on the first line (defendant) and said it should be (defender) should that be the case as to every time defendant is refered to in the letter thanks again thought i was doing brill but not got to be perfectt
Link to post
Share on other sites

:mad: wee bit upset! no one replied but anyway went to court today with everything worded ok hearing date 28th feb 2007 clerk wen`t ha!ha!,just wait on the letter for every one in scotland make sure everything is down to the letter of the law dot ur i¬s and +ur t¬s u know the score,be warned if it`s not wright it means numerous journeys back and fro,like a numpty like me anyway i like a day out or two thanks again to all the team and keep up the good work will keep u all posted
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the wording for the particulars of claim. I'm new to this but am claiming against the RBoS for myself and Clydesdale for my girlfriend. The first letter back from Clydesdale says that is she pursues them they will take court action against her for breach of contract!!! I'm guessing it's their standard first reply. Have u had anything similar from Clydesdale?

Good luck with the court action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the wording for the particulars of claim. I'm new to this but am claiming against the RBoS for myself and Clydesdale for my girlfriend. The first letter back from Clydesdale says that is she pursues them they will take court action against her for breach of contract!!! I'm guessing it's their standard first reply. Have u had anything similar from Clydesdale?

Good luck with the court action

Yes its a standard scare tactic.FWIW when we recieved their defence it said we had not had penalty charges,because to do so we would have to have been in breach of contract and at no time had we been in breach of contract and they were services charges that had been applied to the account.So there you go, a contradiction straight away

;) If this helps please click the scales bottom left
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. I assumed it was just a ploy but it made me more determined to pursue it.

The RBS tactic was to deny that they could find my accounts :eek: (closed them 3 years ago). Basically said that they had no record of me being a customer and they delayed sending me any statements for 3 months until I contacted the Data Protection people. Then they sent me some (missing out the later months when I had most charges). I guess the banks hope that most of us give up and go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello there sorry i didnt respond earlier but as zebbydog says its just there way of frightning u of i got the same letter,but as u know ive put the papers into court,as for rbos,my freind just got a partial settlement last week,he took the carrot dangled in front of him,because he was a bit short at this time of year it will pay for his kids xmas,so just keep going and it will pay of good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Braveheart. Glad you managed to sort your claim in the end. I have to confess that I am not so familiar with the Scottish legal system, but I must say it seems the court clerks are really helpful there.

 

Govan Law Centre is also a useful site you might like to look at, and if you have questions we can try and get answers between us all.

 

Unfair UK Bank Charges | legal help from Govan Law Centre, Glasgow, UK

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:p got word back from court today stating return date 2/02/07 the hearing date 9/02/07,also enclosed form 11 which may or may not require to be completed by me depending on the defenders response to the summons. also it states that it is important that i contact their office on the monday following the return date as to ascertain what response,if any,the defender has made to the summons good luck to everyone and once again thanks for all the invaluable help so far
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck Brave, sure you won't need it but have it anyway.

 

Merry Christmas.

Been screwed by banks all my life, it's payback time!!!!

 

OK as I seem to be handing out advice here I guess I had better add a disclaimer to my signature, Caro, hope you don't mind but I nicked yours.

 

Advice & opinions given by Dread are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...