Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DWP Change of circumstances. Help


Snowfall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone please help to allay my fears?

Potted History

 

My husband who is significantly disabled is in receipt of DLA ( not changed over to pip yet)

He has been on enhanced mobility since 1994 following a severe rta.

Multiple injuries, crush fractures etc.

spent two years in hospital initially followed by several further surgeries.

He didn’t claim the care component.

 

He was told he’d never walk again and he was offered medical retirement at this time.

This he refused and with sheer determination and hard work managed to gain some mobility back, all be it severely restricted.

He put himself through uni and changed career to enable him to work.

He continued to meet the criteria for DLA.

 

Fast forward to 2006,

mobility deteriorating,

spine breaking down,

severe pain constantly,

legs becoming weaker,

unable to walk without crutches,

and using wheelchair for distance.

 

At this point he applied for the care component of DLA and was awarded enhanced care.

Admitted to hospital for spinal surgery, metal cage fixed around lumbar spine.

This surgery though complicated, gave some support to his crumbling spine.

His mobility and care needs remained unchanged.

 

In 2010 he had an emergency admission to hospital,

he needed urgent knee surgery on his right leg,

we knew this was was to be expected,

he has no knee caps and extensive damage to both legs.

 

His prognosis has always been in the negative and was just a matter of time before his legs would give up completely.

At this time he was medically retired from work as despite adjustments he was unable to continue to function properly.

He has continued to deteriorate and is on opioid meds along with other meds.

 

Now,

he/we didn’t inform DWP of these admissions to hospital,

we were under the impression that because he wasn’t in hospital for longer than 4 weeks,

and there wasn’t any improvement in his overall condition in that his mobility and care needs remain unchanged,

that we didn’t need to tell them.

I am now aware that this is not the case.

 

My husband, since learning about this has had a complete mental health breakdown, necessitating GP intervention.

He has convinced himself that because of our error by not informing the DWP of these admissions then they will see it as fraud and take action against him.

We have had no contact from DWP, it is just something my husband read and has gone into panic mode.

 

My apologies for the lengthy first post,

I was trying to give some background and I’m desperately trying to hold things together.

 

He was going to phone/ write to DWP to “confess” his error but I’m not sure it’s the correct thing to do given his present mental state.

 

Any advice, reassurance would be most welcome.

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it would really effect anything

the period in hospital, although 'weeks' was just that, weeks..

it doesn't invalidate anything 'totally'

other than p'haps he got more than what he was entitled too for that short period which wont amount to much.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry too much,

under 2 weeks each time will certainly not amount to any great value of anything IF he wasn't entitled to that particular 'element' of any award he was on.

it most certainly doesn't mean the wHOLE of an award is due, solely whichever element i'e care? that couldn't be done by whomever as some else was carrying out that task for them.

 

the experts will be along in the morning.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

under 2 weeks each time will certainly not amount to any great value of anything IF he wasn't entitled to that particular 'element' of any award he was on.

 

If the stay in hospital was less than 28 days on each occasion. then there shouldn't be any effect on his benefit payments. Only if any of the periods of hospitalisation were over 28 days would it trigger an overpayment. Even then, only certain elements would be affected. From: https://www.gov.uk/dla-disability-living-allowance-benefit/how-to-claim

 

You must contact the Disability Service Centre if your circumstances change, as this can affect how much DLA you get. For example:

 

  • the level of help you need or your condition changes
  • you go into hospital or a care home for more than 4 weeks
  • you go abroad for more than 13 weeks
  • you’re imprisoned or held in detention

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:whoo:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Mr P

 

As I understand it,

because he was in hospital having surgery for under two weeks and his care needs following remain unchanged,

then there was no requirement to inform DWP?

 

My husband interprets it as because he was having surgery,

this constitutes a change in condition,

regardless of the outcome.

 

He has multiple difficulties which can only deteriorate with time,

surgical interventions whilst perhaps dealing with specific acute problems will never result in a positive outcome overall.

 

My husband's present mental state will not allow him to see things rationally,

he's convinced he's at fault and wants to write to DWP to "confess" his errors of not informing them.

 

This action concerns me as I'm fully aware of DWPs remit and their heavy handed approach.

I just don't know how to approach this and relieve some of my husband's fears.

 

Any advice or opinion on this problem would be most welcome.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, because he was in hospital having surgery for under two weeks and his care needs following remain unchanged, then there was no requirement to inform DWP?

 

That is how I read the information provided by gov.uk. If your husband wants to write a letter to "confess", let him do so. When it comes to posting it, pop it in your handbag and go for a short walk to the nearest postbox. On your return, use the letter to light the fire :wink:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is how I read the information provided by gov.uk. If your husband wants to write a letter to "confess", let him do so. When it comes to posting it, pop it in your handbag and go for a short walk to the nearest postbox. On your return, use the letter to light the fire :wink:

 

That’s perhaps the first smile I’ve cracked for days:) Thank you x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...