Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tinkerbelle v BoS * * WON * *


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6477 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Received a letter this morning from Halifax Customer Relations responding to my letter of the 12th July. Said they had received my complaint and they are looking into it.

 

They must be overwhelmed with work at the moment, because I never sent them any letter dated 12th July. My last letter to them was dated 3rd July.

 

My court summons to them was issued on the 12th July, so I guess that's what they are referring to.

 

I get the feeling that they will be continuing with their catalogue of errors with this one :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following your saga with interest Tinkerbelle, Good Luck, who knows maybe these clowns will turn up 2 days too late for your case !!!

 

T

I will not be held liable for any advice/comments given... if in any doubt please consult professional advice.

 

HBOS Acc1 - Small Claim Filed 31/07/06 - WON -21/8/06 - MCOL -06/09/06 - WON 13/09/06

 

HBOS acc2 -Small Claim Filed 02/08/06 - WON 13/09/06 - Round 2 Prelim Letter sent 14/09.06 - LBA sent 27/09/06 - MCOL 16/10/06

 

HBOS acc3 Prelim Letter sent 14/09/06 - LBA sent 27/09/06 - MCOL 16/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Keep going and good luck!

 

I'm just setting out on this journey with three separate BOS accounts - that'll confuse them!!

 

It certainly will!

 

Seeing as they cannot manage to get ONE account sorted out - can you imagine the sheer panic at their end having to deal with three? :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got home today to a letter posted 2nd class from the Ivory Towers on Trinity Road. The letter said:

 

=================================

 

I have received and have been dealing with the proceedings, which you have issued against Halifax plc in the Northampton County Court.

Your claim relates to bank charges debited to your current account. These charges were debited to your account in accordance with the account terms and conditions, which you agreed to accept, and by which you are bound.

 

I have returned the form of Acknowledgement of Service to the Northampton County Court indicating that Halifax intends to defend your claim. However, on a purely commercial basis, it will cost Halifax money to defend your claim in terms of the legal costs that will be incurred. It is unlikely that Halifax will be able to recover these costs (even if the bank wins) because your claim will probably be allocated to the small claims track, in which costs are not generally awarded.

 

For this reason, but without admission of liability, Halifax is willing to reimburse £xxx in respect of the bank charges incurred, together with £xxx in respect of approximate interest that Halifax has calculated was charged on your account as a result of the charges. Please see the attached schedule of bank charges and interest for ease of reference. The Halifax will also reimburse £xx in respect of the Court fee. This amounts to £xxx, please find enclosed a cheque made payable to yourself for this amount.

 

I will write to the Court to let them know that your claim has been settled and would be grateful if you could do the same.

 

We are keen to help you avoid any unnecessary charges in the future by providing various ways to keep track of your account. You can do this via telephone bamking on 0845 20 30 40, online banking (www.halifax.co.uk) or by obtaining a mini statement at our cash machines. You can also contact one of our banking advisers at any of our branches.

 

Ultimately it is your responsibility to manage your account. If you incur any future charges the Halifax reserves the right to withdraw your banking facilities; full details are explained in the terms and conditions of the account. If you would like to discuss this, please contact our Customer Relations department on 08457 25 35 19 option 2.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

=====================================================

 

I had to laugh when I read the letter, because:

  1. This claim refers to a closed account
  2. I asked them to pay the money into my other Halifax Account
  3. They sent me two cheques. One for the charges and one for the interest plus court fee.
  4. No schedule of charges was included.

They must be really busy up there in Halifax :roll:

 

Carry on the good fight people :cool:

 

Survey Completed - ü

Mods Notified - ü

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6477 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...