Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abbey mind games


blackmanfamily
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:confused: Hello all

 

have made first steps to reclaim monies from abbey

 

So far have had statements back to july 2000 and they have charged us £1175,polite request for repayment sent for this, however account was opened 1997 but no statements despite requests by telephone for this

40 day deadline up 22nd November how do i put pressure on them for the rest of the statements bearing in mind they cashed the £10 cheque....

 

Are they trying to delay?:confused:

:p
Link to post
Share on other sites

Try reading Puffa thread that was posted this evening. There is a section on it about Abbey and the microfiche arguement. Also there is a template that you can use. Also if they do not send you the information within the 40 days there is another letter in the templates section that you can use. Having read different peoples threads I have seen that this is definately one of their delaying tactics. Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

round 2 ....

 

have this weekend recieved a letter from marc winder tthanking me for my complaint and telling me that they will write to us in 4 weeks to tell us what is happening..... probably planning to send us a christmas card.

:-x

and although he does not know what the solution is he hopes that it will be one we are happy with.... yes a full refund plus costs will be nice

 

anyone sent a letter in response to this kind of letter?

:p
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes stupid I know but a waste of time, you will just get a repeat of the same letter worded differently requesting a further 4 weeks to investigate your claim. Ultimatly you will get a GOGW payment. So get your LBA of with the schedule of charges. You will still get your GOGW but be that much further down the road to getting the lot back. Best wishes.

 

Regards bish.

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of banks don't keep any records for more than 6 years. However, I do believe Abbey keep records on microfiche for at least ten.

 

Forgive me for asking but where did you get this idea from?

 

As far as i can tell all banks and financial organisations at the least keep active account records in their entirety.

 

The Co-op has data going back on my closed account which is older than 9 years at least.

 

Its likely that they hold data for 6 years post account closure since thats the time period post which they will be liable, ordinarily under the limitations act for claims based on the contract.

 

I know from other members that companies have provided data which is significantly older than 6 years from a range of sources, so I would be interested to know where you got this gem?

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

so can i send lba for the period to july 2000 and add estimate of charges for the un supplied statements?

 

You can but when it comes to claiming you must inlcude the option to amend the claim when the relevant data is available.

 

also i can complain to the information commisioner?

 

If the 40 day statutory period has expired. If they owe you statements and the 40 days havent expired then there is a template to send them in the library.

 

what is best suggestion?

 

matt

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well here we go again MCOL filed and acknowledged 22/12/2006

 

Today recieved a letter from Abbey claiming that we hd not provided any details as to how we arrived at the figures involved in the claim.....

despite prelim letter for payment and lba, both with copies attached and also recieving replies from abbeys complaints team

 

i think that i have seen similar tacks on other threads, can somebody point me in the right direction as to how i respond t their letter?

:p
Link to post
Share on other sites

have replied as follows with copies to court

 

 

Abbey PLC

2 Triton Square

Regents Place

London

NW1 3AN

 

Friday, 29 December 2006

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx v Abbey National PLC

Claim No xxxxxxxx

 

Dear Sirs,

 

We are in receipt of your letter dated 22/12/2006, in requesting information in regards to the above case.

Please find enclosed a current copy of the claim breakdown.

This information has been supplied to you in our correspondence dated 14th November 2006, 28th November 2006 prior to commencing action

We are well aware of the requirement to furnish the courts with this information and have also took the incentive to supply them with your request for this information as a matter of due course, as well as copies of the claim breakdown.

In terms of contact details, you can make contact with us at any time

via e-mail xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Home telephone 01xxx xxxxxx

Mobile telephone 0xxxx xxxxxxxx

Work telephone 0xxxx xxxxxxxx after January 2nd 2007 "

no doubt the next phase will be a standard defence to spend some more time on it, meanwhile the interest accrues daily at a rate of £0.50, so for every week they delay it means another £3.50 for us...... maybe they will get the message

"bring it we are prepared"

:p
Link to post
Share on other sites

double entry

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...