Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
    • The US central bank has left interest rates unchanged again, noting a "lack of further progress" toward lowering inflation.View the full article
    • The US central bank has left interest rates unchanged again, noting a "lack of further progress" toward lowering inflation.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NHS dentist did filling wrong


lynzfa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6369 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my dentist went private and i got put on a list for a new nhs dentist.when i got a new one i went for a check up and the week after my filling came out and i lost half of my tooth.i went back and got a new filling which took four injections before she could do it coz i could feel it everytime.after that i had toothache everyday for 3 week.i was in so much pain i rang my old dentist and she agreed to see me.When she looked she said she would have to remove the filling.When she did she said the nhs dentist had not removed the decay and the nerves were inflamed which is why i was in so much pain.As a result of the nhs dentists mistake i had to pay 42 pound to get it fixed.Can i claim this back from the nhs or not.i have now gone back to my old dentist as im too scared to go back to the nhs one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ouch! Dental problems are painful, and this one has been as well as financially!

 

You would need to obtain some evidence first of all which clearly shows that the first dentist did not do what they were meant to.

 

Once you have this, write to the dentist concerned with all the facts and evidence against them, and state you are happy for this to be the end of the matter if you are reimbursed in full for the problems which you have had to rectify due to the incorrect treatment you received. If you're cheeky, you can also claim for some damages.

 

A couple of letters may fly to and from; however, clear evidence speak much louder than words, and I shouldn't imagine that you would have too many problems getting your money back.

 

Be warned - taking this to court (if it ever got that far) may be costly, due to the expert witnesses which would need to be drafted in to help your case, as the judge would have no idea what the work consisted of and would need some unbiased information.

 

If you have no joy with the dentist, try the practice manager and get the practice's final stand on the matter. Then you could refer it to the General Dental Council for further investigation - however, I would consult a medical negligence solicitor beforehand, as they may be able to resolve the matter more informally.

 

Hope this helps - if so, please click my scales.

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that.My dentist said she would write a letter to confirm that my tooth hadnt been done properly and she also has the xrays she took of my tooth.so hopefully when i have wrote to them i will be reimbursed.Do i tell them i will be considering legal action if i am not reimbursed or do i just write and ask them for it without mentioning legal action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same thing just happened to me mate. I had a big filling done. 2 weeks later was in agony. Had to go and see a different dentist who said the root was rotten and needed a root filling which the first dentist never mentioned. Cost me a further £95 on top of the original filling. To make things worse I got an infection which put me in more agony for a week, face swelled up, couldn't eat anything and I ended up on antibiotics!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to them first without legal action, and if the refuse, then add in the legal action - don't put all your eggs in one basket!

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As some additional information fillings are guaranteed for a minimum of one year.

 

I didn'tknow this until my wife went back to our dentist with a broken filling 11 months after it had been done and he repaired it all free of charge because of the guarantee.

 

Hopefully this should make it easier for you to claim.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

First off ask the NHS dentist for a refund if they then refuse to the refund get in touch with the complaints department of your local Primary Care Trust as they are the ones who have the responsability and you should hopefully get your money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start off letters simple and polite, explaining the problems, details, facts and what you expect as a resolution.

Let us know the response.

Escalate from there onwards after reply.

Persistance will pay. Don't threaten legal action immediately.

If the response is stubborn, you may well receive a letter "drafted" by the denitst's legal indeminty/defence organistion. Its tone will be placatory but resistant. However in most cases the defence society will often advise/insist dentists to settle rather than legal action, which gets very expensive.

Try the Primary Care trust but don't expect too much from them. They are generally incompetant at everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...