Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice On A Section 21 With a Twist ??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

I'm going to try and get some legal advice on this but from passed experience you guys seem to be more help.....lol

 

I've been renting a property for almost 2 years, Before moving in i made sure that it was going to be long term as i have two small children and the landlords said i could be here for 10 years if i wanted as he had no plans to ever sell it, but he wanted to start up off with a 2 year tenancy to make sure that we would be good tenants.

 

A year on and i get a phone call from him saying that he want to sell it to a friend of his but the friend would be willing to keep us on as we are such good tenants.

 

For the last 9 months we have had multiple surveyors coming around to value the property for his friend but they all say the property is unmortgageable because the property needs so much work doing to it.

 

The landlord has now said that his friend has given up trying to buy it but now he wants us out so he can move back in.

 

For the last month or so he has just been telling me that he's in no rush but for me to just keep a look out for somewhere else.

 

But today he called me saying that I'm taking too long and that i should be expecting a section 21 in the post soon as its already been sent.

 

 

Now i need to know what i can do when i receive it as i don't think I'm going to have time to find anywhere else to move in to in time.

 

There is a few things he hasn't done.

 

1. He is not licenced (I'm in a licenced borough)

 

2. He never put my deposit in a rent deposit scheme.

 

3. The only check that's ever been done on the property is a gas safety check, the electrics have never been done.

 

4. general condition of the property is bad, hence why its unmortgageable.

 

I know some of you will say that he cant use a section 21 without using the deposit scheme but he thinks he has found a loophole as while i was waiting for his friend to buy the property, he told me to not pay him a months rent so that i would go from paying him in advance to then paying him in arrears, as it would make things easier when his friend bought it as he would then just need to give his friend my deposit.

 

But now he is classing that money as my deposit and saying he can issue me the section 21 as he has returned my deposit when he told me not to pay a month rent.

 

 

Any advice would be really helpful guys as its not just me I'm worried about but also my family .

Link to post
Share on other sites

LL sounds a right charmer, he can't just conjure a deposit out of thin air. Even if he claimed you paid deposit 1 year late, he would still have to provide full PI within 30 days of alleged payment and deposit amount should be mentioned in AST. If he is claiming deposit returned, I assume he cannot provide any signed receipt? NICEEC electrical inspection is not required for residential property, unless HMO.

If property is in the condition you imply, I would suggest it is not suitable fro 2 young children.

Valid s21 won't be heard for 12-15 weeks, repo order after say 18 weeks, double that if Judge determines s21 not valid, so min 4 months to save for and find alternative accom. or wait for s21 and approach Council for re-housing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should get your local housing department around. If they issue an improvement notice then I understand it will prevent landlord issuing any *new* Section 21 (if you manage to convince him that the current one is void). I understand the law was changed recently to prevent "revenge evictions" where people are evicted after getting the council involved.

 

Alternatively, if you have no time now, you could always suggest to landlord a future date when you will be out by. You might be able to agree a flexible deal where he agrees that you can move out with a couple of weeks' notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...