Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Savers are pouring money into cash Isas as they look to protect the interest on their nest eggs from tax. They put more than £11bn into cash Isas in April.View the full article
    • The stock ended the trading day at nearly $136, up 3.5%, making it more valuable than Microsoft.View the full article
    • More from the Second Sight guys in the Law Gazette. Post Office Inquiry: Second Sight accountant accuses lawyer of conspiring to pervert course of justice | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Second Sight accountant found compelling evidence in two cases that evidence was withheld, public inquiry is told.  
    • Why have there not been arrests yet? Waiting for the end of an inquiry which seems designed to drag on forever is a feeble excuse "the Post Office “was constantly sabotaging our efforts” to seek the truth and used claims of legal professional privilege – a type of confidentiality which covers legal documents – “to justify withholding documents from us”. "Aujard had said the state-owned body “would not hesitate to take legal action against me” under a “draconian” non-disclosure agreement (NDA)" "Henderson became concerned after reviewing the case file of Jo Hamilton, .. Henderson said the Post Office’s decision to charge Hamilton did not seem to be supported by its own internal security report, and there was evidence that “potentially exculpatory material” had not been disclosed to her at trial or subsequently. “I regarded this as either professional misconduct or, potentially, criminal conduct,” he said."   Horizon IT scandal investigator tells inquiry Post Office was ‘sabotaging our efforts’ | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Ian Henderson, looking into possible miscarriages of justice, said he came to believe he was dealing with ‘a cover-up’  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Self catering company refusing to refund after cancellation, please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3975 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This one's a bit long, but please bear with me. I am fuming and desperately need help with this!

 

I booked a self catering apartment for six people for the end of July, however after several of my party dropped out I decided to cancel the booking.

 

My boyfriend and I both sent emails to cancel the booking. We knew we would still be liable for 75% of the accommodation fee as per their (rather unreasonable) cancellation policy, as it was only two weeks until we were due to have arrived (unless they manage to re-let the apartment, in which case we would get the full balance back). Still, we thought getting 25% back was better than nothing. We still have email records of our cancellation emails. My boyfriends in particular was very clear and impossible to dispute, and as we'd both had had previous email correspondence with them using the same email addresses, we know they will have received the emails. However, both emails went unanswered. The woman we dealt with is incredibly difficult to get hold of and doesn't seem to like answering emails, so we weren't surprised by this.

 

We continually tried to get her on the phone, and after several days she phoned me back in response to a rather irate voicemail. I explained very clearly that I would like to cancel the booking. She gave me a vague offer of coming over with just my boyfriend and using the money I'd already paid against a one bedroom apartment, so I could get my 25% back and still have a bit of a holiday. I said I would think about it but that my boyfriend had now made other plans and I was unlikely to find someone else to go with. I said that ideally I wanted to re-let and get my money back. She said she would do her best to re-let the place. This conversation took place entirely by phone and there is no written record of this offer or my response to it.

 

After several days (and several unanswered phone calls) I finally got an email with five days to go saying that they hadn't found anyone to replace us, but that they were still trying. By Friday - the day before we would've arrived - I had still heard no definitive final answer. So I phoned her on Friday, Saturday and Sunday to find out if they'd re-let it, all to no avail. Finally on Monday morning I emailed her saying I could only assume they hadn't found anyone to replace us and please could we just have our 25% back.

 

Yesterday she replied, saying that as she had not been able to re-let the apartment she had expected my arrival on Saturday, and that "cancelling 2 days after expected arrival time is considered a no-show and therefore you are liable for 100% of costs", so I wouldn't get my 25% back.

 

She continued: "I offered you a one bedroom apartment as a replacement but you rejected this idea. You did however say that you would still come if we could not find a replacement, which we could not."

 

Firstly, both of those statements are false, and she knows it. Secondly, I should not be the one to have to chase her to find out whether they had successfully re-let it or not. I am not a mind reader. If they couldn't re-let and knew that it was too late to do so they should have contacted me saying 'this is the situation, what would you like to do?' and certainly should not have ignored my phone calls for three days and then claimed that it was ME being unreliable. Either way, the conversation to which she refers as evidence took place by phone, there is no written record of it. There is however a very clear written record of my boyfriend and I emailing to cancel two weeks ago.

 

If anyone can refer me to any legal points which I may be able to send her way I would greatly appreciate it. I would also like to report them to a tourist board as their conduct has been entirely unprofessional and incompetent right from the beginning.

 

Thank you in advance

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem you have is that you did not confirm you were not going to take advantage of the offer of the one bed apartment and you still wanted to cancel the booking.

You can take them to court and let a judge decide!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem you have is that you did not confirm you were not going to take advantage of the offer of the one bed apartment and you still wanted to cancel the booking.

You can take them to court and let a judge decide!

 

The only reason I even considered the one bedroom is because it would mean I'd still get my 25% back. The cancellation of the six bed was always definite. A no-show for the one bedroom would mean she still owes me that 25%. She is now making out that I, for some reason, wanted to come over with one other person to stay in a six bed apartment and let her keep £400 of my money. She is literally making things up in a bid to keep my money. Business must be very slow!

 

Regardless, I could only have gone if I'd known for certain that they hadn't been able to re-let the place, as I always said that was what I wanted first and foremost. Not only did they not inform me of this one way or the other, they ignored my efforts to contact them for a full five days. And by doing so they ensured that it would have been a no-show even if their fantasy version of events were accurate. And then they try and sting me for it. I will take them to court if I have to, they are either too unscrupulous or to stupid to be running a business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...