Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That "oh dear" doesn't sound good  
    • Oh dear.. Misuse of facility...  Cat 6... No wonder everything is being nuked from high orbit... More in a bit.. 
    • Thank you fkofilee First question: what do I do if Monzo close my account? I need an account but no one will touch me with this marker against me. Is there anywhere/any other option that I have if Monzo close my account? MCB is My Community Bank?  Yes What Category of Marker do you have? This is what it says on the Cifas SAR: Application date: 07 December 2023 Date recorded: 09 April 2024 Expiry date: 09 April 2030 Cifas Case Identifier: 15435315 Product relating to the application, proposal, account or facility: Personal Loan – Unsecured Facility: Granted Case type: Misuse of facility Reason(s) for filing: Evasion of payment Financial Loss Value of Loss: £5000.00 When did you raise the complaint? Last night via email Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan? I can prove that I had to buy a new washing machine, I have my pay slips showing the emergency tax code and a letter from the tax office after I had spoken with them to get it corrected and of course I can get a copy of my vet bill. And all of this was in the first 2-3 months of 2024.  I panicked. Stupid I know and as you say, I have learned the hard way and I am not in any way denying anything that I have done wrong, but it just feels a bit unfair.  It is what it is I guess and if I have to have it on me forever then so be it. I am just so worried about the bank situation 😕    
    • If it is MCB    National Fraud Database Members | Preventing Fraud Losses | Cifas WWW.CIFAS.ORG.UK A range of organisations use the National Fraud Database to share data on confirmed fraud cases, preventing over £1 billion in fraud losses every year.   They are on the register  
    • Hi @LilMissM   I guess you could call me our resident CIFAS Specialist - Personally have been through all of what you have and now have come out the other side when my marker fell off in May 2023. For a start Monzo may close your account but as I had a Marker for App Fraud (Vodafone ended up making a whole hoohah of the account I had with them) - I was with them and still am from Oct 2017 till today. And not once did they close my account. I actually spoke to a couple of current account providers at the time that I had accounts with - Nationwide and Barclays - Told them what was going on and provided all the evidence to them. They advised they may do so but it was highly unlikely now that they understood why it happened and what I was doing to fight it.    Anyway - On to your marker. MCB is My Community Bank?  I can say to you that on experience that On Monday you can be on top of the world then on Tuesday you whole life changes in a flash of an eye. Suddenly you cant pay your bills, Work isnt feasible and you are left with no other choice but to scrape by.  If this has happened to you, then join the club.  - Why is this important? Well Financial institutions get one whiff of potential fraud and you are guilty without a chance to respond. You found out the hard way   If it sounds like I'm waffling, I'm not - Its important to your issue. They have deemed you guilty by the fact that no payments have been made and potentially entered into a loan agreement knowing looking not to pay (Although thats how it may appear, there will always be factors against that)    First off - Questions - What Category of Marker do you have? If unsure, check my signature for a Credit File Guide which will tell you all you need to know about what Categories apply.  - When did you raise the complaint? They will have 8 weeks to respond. More on this in a mo.  - Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan?   My next suggestions, Send this complaint to the CEOs office - CEOEMAIL.COM Let them make the decision as per the Complaint Procedure. Then if they refuse to remove the marker. take it to the FOS who can force the company to remove it if found in favour.  Some companies do need a slap or 2 once in a while to bring them down a peg. You could be looking at this right now.   
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

jhenry vs Lloyds ***WON***


jhenry
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6330 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So here goes, got back from short break away. Got my court claim thru on MCOL on the 19th Oct. Following on from all the S.A.R, LBA's and final responses. Just hoping to ride alongside anyone who claimed same day as me. So sitting tight for now :roll: and hoping things work out, going by the majority of threads, Lloyds are being pretty nasty with stalling everyone. Well good luck to all and certainly look forward to donating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So its now the 3rd November and received SC&M acknowledgement of service on the 26th October (giving them 28 days). I put my claim thru MCOL, sent off the covering letter with the attahced schedule of charges x 2no copies to Northampton.

Ive been reading thru alot of threads and its been advised to send a copy to the bank also, I have not done this. Should i be doing this now at this stage or is it best to fire a letter with the attached schedule of charges to SC&M. Or wait until i receive AQ and send of info then

 

Advise would be much appreciated

 

John H

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can send the bank a schedule of charges but to amend the court papers it costs 35pound

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_0400.pdf

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi a bit of advise if possible.

 

My account has been with Lloyds collection department before I issued my claim, this was obviously due to loan payments not being paid due to unlawful bank charges. So my account has been dealt with by collections. I have just taken a phone call from them saying that I was due to pay the last payment on or before the 9th November. I said that under that due to the charges being taken from my account this month I was unable to pay the amount and couldnt do so unless this months charges were refunded. as tehy can clearly see the charges are ongoing due to thier excessiveness. I suggested that I could pay the last payment on the last date of this month clearing the debt. He then rambled on and said that Lloyds were not happy with this therefor ethey would be closing my account and forwarded onto debt agency. I said that they were unable to do this under the relevant acts. so on so on. and he put the phone down on me.

 

So I know I am to wait and receive written confirmation of this "closing of account" but could some one advise on what possible is the best direction to take in the mean time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, received Defence from SC&M and also AQ from Northampton county court, which incidently has been transferred to Romford County Court. Filled in relevant N149 form will be copying and sending off to court, and SC&M

 

Filled in section G, as below ( hoping all is ok)

 

I respectfully request that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument. However, the continuing problem is (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith. Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid end to this litigation.

 

When I get a spare hour over the next few days I will hand deliver to Romford County Court with the £100 which is due before the 6th December and wait for the SC&M AQ. Whilst waiting will get going on the court bundle, all getting to the worring stage now, so fingers crossed Ive done so as all before and look forward to the next stage.

 

Keep ya's all posted

 

Jhenry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Barty, appreciated mate!!

 

I just hope everything works out. Im probably not the only one but I get the feeling somethings gonna happen or get a letter in the post saying

 

"Dont be stupid Mr Henry you cant claim for this amount youve already paid it to us there's no way were giving it back"

 

I know that wont happen or at least I THINK that wont happen. Im just pleased I was informed of this website and the support on here is outstanding. It all started from a wedding I attended with the misses back in May, fella was telling me about him reclaiming his bank charges thru the guidance of this website, I thought Jesus Ill have a go at that and here I am. Just hope it goes to the end and to the outcome we all wish for. So again thanks for your support.

 

jhenry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi a bit of advise if possible.

 

My account has been with Lloyds collection department before I issued my claim, this was obviously due to loan payments not being paid due to unlawful bank charges. So my account has been dealt with by collections. I have just taken a phone call from them saying that I was due to pay the last payment on or before the 9th November. I said that under that due to the charges being taken from my account this month I was unable to pay the amount and couldnt do so unless this months charges were refunded. as tehy can clearly see the charges are ongoing due to thier excessiveness. I suggested that I could pay the last payment on the last date of this month clearing the debt. He then rambled on and said that Lloyds were not happy with this therefor ethey would be closing my account and forwarded onto debt agency. I said that they were unable to do this under the relevant acts. so on so on. and he put the phone down on me.

 

So I know I am to wait and receive written confirmation of this "closing of account" but could some one advise on what possible is the best direction to take in the mean time.

 

Try this - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/29826-help-enforcement-notice.html#post232568

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GaryH

 

Much appreciated for your response I never did actually get a letter confirming their instruction to close. What I did get was a gently conversation from a very nice lady at Lloyds phoning to confirm that the loan account was now closed and my account was back with Lloyds local branch. She also, dare i say this, said that she would take the £60 pound charges that were due charged to my account on the 1st December taken off. This was due to the collections department taking the agreed loan amount on the wrong day (whan I had no money covering it) causing me to be charged unpaid S/O. So was pretty happy about that. :D

 

An update: Im due to the local court tomorrow too hand in AQ with £100 fee. so gradually getting there I hope.

 

jhenry :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my AQ in to Local County Court today. Paid the 100 sobs. Now sit back and wait for reply.

 

Be interesting to see how the march got on outside the OFT today. Heard it 1st thing this morning on BBC news24 ;)

 

Hope all enjoyed the evening

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the 6th December tomorrow my AQ had to be in to Romford Court by this date but got in on Friday 1st December. Faxed the AQ to SC&M with schedule of charges. which I also sent by recorded delivery also. Will give the Court a ring tomorrow along with SC&M to make sure all documents have been received. So will wait for Lloyds/SC&M AQ and see what directions they intend to take, no doubt the usuall.

 

Just a question I assume that they are giving that date also for the AQ to be entered:idea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, their AQ will have to be in by the same date. They are often late submitting it though.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So received Lloyds TSB AQ, but in section A they have ticked NO to wanting a month to enter into settlement and also under section G "The defendant intends to rely on its defence and the terms and conditions that govern the account".

 

Could anyone advise me if this stops me from sending or entering into diologue with them about settlement, please. Only thru reading other threads Lloyds seem to tick the yes box here.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks Michael, so is it more of the case of approching them and saying something along the lines of "look from source I know that in past cases you have wished for a period of time for settlement. Why in this case have you not, knowing that the majority of cases against you, you have chosen to settle before a court hearing date. Thus delaying the case even further, additionally incorporating more interset under the section 69 of the county courts act and generally waisting the courts time. So by the above do you wish now to enter into diologue and resolve the claim other than that I am happy to sit and wait until the court hearing date".

 

Like I said something along the lines of but the above being very brief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally would'nt contact them now they don't request a stay for settlement. All indications are that they're settleing within reasonable time of the AQ again lately anyway. Of course its your decision entirely, but remember there is a fine line to tread between trying to resolve the matter efficiantly and appearing panicy or unconfidant in the merit of your claim. You should also consider heading your letter 'without prejudice', depending on the content.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Garyh

 

I had in mind to send the following, would it cause much harm in sending. I know you said best not to but appreciate your view

 

 

"Without Prejudice"

 

Mr John Hxxxx

87 xx xx

Cxx xx

Romford

Essex

Rxx xxx

Case No 6QZxxxxx

 

 

Dear Sechairi,Clark & Mitchell,

 

Thank you for the Defendants copy of the Allocation Questionnaire of which I confirm receiving. I have already sent you a copy of mine covered by a fax letter dated 4th December 2006 and also by recorded post on 5th December 2006. I hope you received it, if you haven’t don’t hesitate to call me on 077xxxxxxx Mon-Fri 09:30-!700.

In receiving and analysing the defendants AQ I see the Defendant has not wished for a month’s settlement by informal discussion or an alternative resolution. I am disappointed your client has not wished to settle but if the Defendant was to settle before documents are exchanged a lot of paperwork would be avoided from both parties. Also should this go to court the Defendant may get some unnecessary publicity.

I personally believe that litigation should always be a last resort and would of course have been happy to settle this matter without the need for a court hearing.

Please be advised, that I am completely confidant in the strength of my claim and believe that your clients charges could indeed be proved to be unlawful penalty’s which you are trying to cloak as contractual service charges. For this reason, I will only settle for the full amount of the claim.

 

Should the Defendant decide to settle this before court, my claim amount is as follows:-

Bank Charges 16/11/2000-02/10/2006 = £39xx.xx + 8% Interest pursuant to S69 of the County Courts Act = £47xx.xx

Court Costs (Claim)120+(AQ)100 =£220

 

Total Amount Owed =£49xx.xx

A copy of this letter will also be sent to the court.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: :grin: Cracking

Had settlement leeter from SC&M yesterday for full amount and interest and additional cost.

 

So an absolute big thank you to this website and site helpers and others who guided me thru

 

Thank you and as soon as money is in the account I will be sure to donate

:grin: :grin: :grin: :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woohoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

 

Excellant news, well done!:)

 

Thanks for the donation too - its much appreciated I'm sure as the site relies on donations as its only real source of income.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...