Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rob v Smile


Robbop
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I thought I'd post my experiences with Smile here -

The story so far

Sent an SAR to smile in June

Waited, waited, waited - no reply within the 40 days, so I got in touch with the Information Commissioner's office, reporting them under the Data Protection Act.

ICO replied to me stating that smile claimed never to have recieved my letter.

*MORAL*

Always send stuff recorded delivery!

Resent the SAR last week, and today received a standard acknowledgment letter.

This (claiming not to have received SAR) may be a tactic, or it may be due to my incompetence, but in my experience the mail is not that unreliable...

Anyone else have this happen?

Rob - reclaiming what's mine :)

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to Smile 9/10/2006

Partial repayment - £1700

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did your payment ever get cashed, assuming it was a cheque. If postal orders I believe they can be traced too, but are a bit of a nightmare I'm told. You are lucky to have heard anything from the ICO, but mail does get lost sometimes.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caro,

No the cheque was never cashed - but they wouldn't would they, if they wished to pretend they'd not received it?

Mind you if it got lost in the post it wouldn't get cashed either :)

Rob - reclaiming what's mine :)

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to Smile 9/10/2006

Partial repayment - £1700

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recently got this secure message from them - strangely enough at the same time as the information commissioner's office would have been in touch with them...

 

 

Hello Mr Pembro

 

We're just letting you know that your £2460.00 overdraft is due to end. Unfortunately, due to a recent review of your account we can't offer an arrangement for this amount. However, we have set up an overdraft of £500.00 to be automatically renewed on 24/10/2006 and run until 24/10/2007.

 

For details of the terms and conditions and any charges that apply to your overdraft, please go to help index: tariffs, t&cs. Please note that we reserve the right to vary our charges at any time, but we will always let you know before they change.

 

If you do not want your overdraft to be renewed please contact us within the next 14 days.

 

We offer an optional overdraft protection plan provided by Norwich Union. It offers you cover for the following: accident, illness, involuntary unemployment or death. The cost is 50p per person per £100 of the overdraft limit (regardless of whether the overdraft is used). To take this cover you must be UK resident, working at least 16 hours per week, aged over 18 and under 65. For more information on the overdraft protection policy, please go to http://www.smile.co.uk/images/pdf/overdraft_protection_policy.pdf. If you would like to take our overdraft protection plan, please reply to this message.

 

Thanks

 

smile

 

Cheek!

First of all I wouldn't need the overdraft facility if it wasn't for their illegal charges, and then, to add insult to injury they try and sell me their worthless insurance policy!

Rob - reclaiming what's mine :)

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to Smile 9/10/2006

Partial repayment - £1700

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to point out Rob that the charges are unlawful and not illegal as they do not come under criminal law. Secondly I suggest that you cancel your cheque, send another S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and a letter (or secure message backed up by letter) saying that you want to place the account in dispute so they cannot take any further action until the dispute is resolved. It may be too late to stop them pulling the overdraft, but assuming that you can't afford to pay it all back at once you need to try and agree a way to repay it over a period of time at a rate that you can afford.

  • Haha 1
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stand corrected - I didn't realise there was a difference between "illegal" and "unlawful"!

As I stated in my original post, I have already resent the S.A.R.(and had it acknowledged) - but not before they informed me of their actions re: the overdraught. I strongly suspect that, being forewarned of my intentions by the information commissioner's query, they shut down my overdraught to prevent charges escalating. That doesn't get the bills paid though does it? ( well not yet anyway) I am unfortunately in the position of living on my overdraught - largely due to their *unlawful* charges

Thanks for the advice though - I sent them a secure message and a "snailmail" asking to put the account in dispute, and to contact me to arrange a "mutually acceptable" way of reducing the O/D which does not leave me on the street...

Rob - reclaiming what's mine :)

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to Smile 9/10/2006

Partial repayment - £1700

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Partial Success! Following Caro's advice I wrote to the bank via both snailmail and secure message. They rang me and I offered to have a reducing overdraught facility - by £20 a month - to which they agreed! As the 40 day deadline for their replying to my S.A.R. is at the end of this month, (Nov) I'm not too worried about that condition :)

I've since had 2 (standard - type) letters assuring me that "my complaint is being looked into"

Rob - reclaiming what's mine :)

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to Smile 9/10/2006

Partial repayment - £1700

Link to post
Share on other sites

Partial Success! Following Caro's advice I wrote to the bank via both snailmail and secure message. They rang me and I offered to have a reducing overdraught facility - by £20 a month - to which they agreed! As the 40 day deadline for their replying to my S.A.R. is at the end of this month, (Nov) I'm not too worried about that condition :)

I've since had 2 (standard - type) letters assuring me that "my complaint is being looked into"

 

This seems to be something Smile are more than willing to do, My overdraft with them hit 800 at one point and they suggested the same thing to me, sliding it down by 25 a month until it was back to its original 500 thus avoiding charges. As luck had it I started a DMP with CCCS at the same time so everything worked well together, and I have managed to not use the overdraft facility since (a couple of successful claims has helped) :D

 

I've said this before and I'll say it again Smile are one of the most helpful banks I have ever dealt with.

 

Now I must run off and see if that credit has cleared into my account yet so I can make a another donation to the site :)

  • Haha 1

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, my complaint was "looked into" and I got a letter informing me that £1700 had been paid into my account - this was before they sent me my statements that I had requested in the S.A.R. - so naturally I waited until that had arrived. As I also have a life to live, it has taken me a couple of weeks to get around to wading through 6 years worth of statements. Having now done my sums it seems that the repayment was about £300 light - so first thing in the new year they will be getting a letter from me requesting that plus the statutory interest on the entire sum - or I will see them in court!

As the interest comes to another £350ish I think that will do nicely as compensation for all the angst they have put me through over the years!

Rob - reclaiming what's mine :)

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to Smile 9/10/2006

Partial repayment - £1700

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...