Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

I submitted a (Bullying & Harassment) claim against my ex employer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Morning,

 

I Need a bit of advice regarding my submitted claim to ET. I submitted a (Bullying & Harassment) claim against my ex employer to ET in October 2012. Since then I have received two letters from ET , 1). Acceptance of my claim and 2). Notice of Orders.

 

Since then my ex employer ( i..e the respondent) has engaged a top solicitor and he is communicating with me on their behalf. We have exchanged list of documents with each other following ET's instructions.

 

However couple of days back, the respondent's solicitor asked me to submit my "Schedule of Loss"..

 

I have following questions regarding that as Schedule of Loss is a new thing for me;

 

a). Can the respondent's solicitor ask me to share the schedule of loss, or it should only be shared with Employment Tribunal?

 

b). What motive the respondent's solicitor might have while asking for Schedule of loss? I mean why he might be asking for it?

 

c). How this schedule of loss can be used by the respondent's solicitor and for what reason?

 

I will really appreciate help for these answers.

 

Thanks & regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

He will be asking for it to see if they can settle out of court. Which may be an option that will save you a lot of stress. Do feel free to post up your schedule if you are unsure if you have missed anything.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot for your reply Emmzzi. Thats what I was suspecting. But do the respondent's solicitor has the any legal standing or I mean legal clause following which he can directly ask me to share schedule of loss.

 

I asking this because in ET's letter there was no mention of exchanging the schedule of loss with respondents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are normally required to serve the Schedule of Loss on the other side and I am surprised this was not mentioned in the Tribunal's letter? Are you sure it does not say you should serve it on the Tribunal and the Respondent?

 

The general rule is that the other side are entitled to all documents you send to the Tribunal, that is how the system works, you do not get to hide things from the other side. The Tribunal cannot hold a fair hearing if the Respondent does not know what the Claimant is asking for, because the Respondent has a right to contest the amounts you are claiming. I would just send them the Schedule, it could easily come back to bite you if they find out about it for the first time at a Tribunal hearing.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Steampowered: You are right, I also read it that ET should have included it in their Notice or Orders but unfortunately they didnt.

 

Now I am working on the Schedule of Loss and cant not understand the point where there is a mention os "Loss of Employers'/Employee's Pension Contribution", The only deductions I used to have on my payslips were Tax and NI Conctribution?

 

So is this Loss of Employers'/Employee's Pension Contribution" and NI Contribution is the same? Should I also include this in my schedule of loss.?

 

Thanks & regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many employers contribute to a pension scheme on your behalf. If they did not then there is no loss of pension contributions. It is nothing to do with national insurance, which is a tax and not a contribution towards your pension.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...