Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nationwide Credit card- I won my PPI claim and had problems ever since.HELP please?


carlea80
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

I posted last year on getting advice for PPI claim against Nationwide credit card and was successful last May/June. I got a letter saying the money would be refunded to the card so was very happy, the agreed limit on the card was £1900 so I was relieved to think that I had it available as an emergency source of funds.

 

I also after accepting the amount offered asked for a replacement pin as hadn't used it in awhile and forgot it.The day after I did this I logged into online banking to see my accounts etc and noticed that when the refunded amount was credited back to the credit card my Credit Limit Amount was reduced to just £500.

 

I had not been told of this and found it highly convenient timing on their part, so I contacted the card services team, who assured me they had the right too do this and that it was "mere coincidence" I asked why it hadn't been notified of this prior to my PPI claim, to which I finally got a letter later in June saying that as responsible lenders they "reguarlarly review customer's limits and that the decision to lower mine was to help me manage my borrowing". I also during the conversation asked once again how convienantly the card wouldn't work online or with the pin number I had been sent out after the refunded amount was credited back to be told that was an actual BLOCK on the account and I had to send them some financial information. I explained that if they could put it in writing exactly what I needed to do I would then send them the information.

 

I never heard anything and recently I had my latest statement through and I owe a current balance of under £4.00 and it for some reason triggered me that I hadn't ever heard from them, so I sent a message via online account to card services. I then got a phone call asking what my concerns were etc, etc, so I went through it all again and the next day got a confirmation call telling me that she had looked into it and that they would send me a "copy" of the correspondance in the letter to me about the block. The letter dated 12th Feb had NO copy of this alledged letter and states that the" block was placed on the account when a claim was made on your PPI policy in 2009" !!

 

This made me puzzled as I was sure I had used the card since 2009, and having checked a couple statements I did indeed use the card on 6th April 2010 for £172.63. How would this have been possibke with the BLOCK being on the account, as I cant use it now??!!!

 

I am self-employed so have been asked to provide 3 months bank statements, but before doing so wanted to check that they can actually do this?!! It all seems very convenient timing as prior to my 2012 PPI claim on the card I was never told of any block, or even had the credit limit reduced whilst it was near maximum, then I win a case and have trouble.

 

Sorry for the long story but not sure where I stand, so advice greatly appreciated.

Edited by carlea80
Missed some information out
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it does seem rather strange doesn't it.

 

What I might be inclined to do is write a letter to the bank and head if formal complaint. Although that will give them 8 weeks to respond, it also means that they must give you a final decision which in turn means that you can take the matter to fos if you so wish.

 

I would suggest that you set out the full time-line of events that have happened from your point of view and question them to provide a full and complete answer on each of the points. Things like when specifically was the block put on the account and specifically why.

 

And, when was the credit limit reduced and specifically why.

 

Let them know that you feel that this is retaliatory action being take for your PPI claim.

 

Get all the points you want answers to in the letter so it may be quite a long one.

 

From what comes back will help you determine whether there is a course for the matter to be referred to fos.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...