Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Defending small claims court action


jacobina
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4061 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

" but it is generally the case that litigants in person are given an awful lot of leeway to miss deadlines."

 

But not as much as the Claimants SP:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

" but it is generally the case that litigants in person are given an awful lot of leeway to miss deadlines."

 

But not as much as the Claimants SP:wink:

 

Too true !

 

As the case is still going forward we need to get a copy of the clinic notes from the claimant. We have asked for these before but to no avail. We asked again after the court hearing and the claimant said they are only normally released to another vet!?.... I want to request them under part 18. Do I do this in the form of a letter in the first instance to the claimant stating that we are writing under part 18? Do I need to give a reason for requesting them? They are clearly relevant, and we already have a copy of the clinic notes from the 2nd vet who subsequently treated the horse and brought him back to full health.

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant actually request the documents using CPR 18 you can ask for information pertaining to them.Without knowing the full details of your thread or what satge you are at then you will get further opportunity at AQ Draft Directions if Fast Track) or Standard Disclosure.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm, don't understand...... We are the defendant in a small claims track, the claimant is a vet who misdiagnosed my daughter's horse and did not seem to understand how sick the horse was. After 3 weeks in his care his last visit resulted in my daughter taking the horse for a second opinion. The horse was diagnosed within two hours and hospitalised for 7 days and treated with several drugs intravenously and kept sedated. His condition was life threatening. We have not paid the first vets bill as we do not believe he acted with reasonable care and was negligent. Also, we have a very large second bill which has been paid in full. The claimant managed to default on three consecutive court orders to put an expert witness report in place, hence the strike Out hearing yesterday, which we, the defendant applied for. A court order has now been put in place with specific dates for the claimant to adhere to, to find, agree with us, instruct and obtain expert witness report. A final hearing for the case withthe expert witness report is in July. We would like to see the clinic notes from the first vet as during the time he was treating the horse there are other circumstances in our defence pack where the vet has acted in appropriately and overdosed the horse with sedation, and used undue force . Previous advice says to use part 18.

 

How does standard disclosure work?

 

Thanks

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

Small claims track cases are very much controlled by the DJ and disclosures requested by you the defendant are restricted in a way that you cant draft directions and are at the mercy of the DJ to request disclosure.So you cant orchestrate or lead the claimant in disclosure unlike fast track.

If you have not completed the DQ as yet then the claim is in effect untracked so CPR does apply.CPR 31.14 for documents referred to in their particulars of claim and CPR 18 for information not referred to.

 

Standard disclosure happens after the case is allocated and Witness Statements have been exchanged.Standard disclosure will be each parties documents referred to and used within the particulars and the defence.So if the Vet has referred to the case notes in his Witness statement then he must disclose them and you can request that they be disclosed to you before trial.

 

Its a case of knowing the process and how to weed information from the other party to support your defence/case.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As mentioned above cpr 18 and 31 doesnt apply tothe small track, they can be used if your case is on fast/multi track and (theoritically at least), BEFORE allocation (this is why it is mentioned quite a bit on this forum), once allocated they cant be used, this is simply to keep snmall claims as uncomplex and cheap as possible.

 

You could of course call a vet as an espert witness, BUT this needs Judgfes permission, again, simply to keep costs down.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...