Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OVER PRICED repairs may force car to be write off


princess roxy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi my dad owns a 2003 vw polo, it has low mileage under 50k, is in mint condition, hes had it from new and really looks after it. A boy racer hit his wing and put big scratches all down one side ,wing needs replacing ,and small damage to the door , plus all the scratches. No mechanical problems and the car can be driven as normal Problem here is ,the insurance company have told him that a certain local garage will do the repairs, but we know this garage to be absolute rip off merchants,when pricing up repairs they go way over the top(we know this through experience) and my dad is now worried that they may overcharge that much on the price of the repairs , the costs may cause his car to be written off. Does he have to use THIS repairer,or can he use another one. he would not get a car with this mileage ,in this condition , for the measly price they would pay out as a write off. .thanks Roxy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they were to say its not worth repairing because the garage over charges for the work then the best option would be to buy the car back of the insurance company then pay for the repairs out of the insurance pay out. its a win win situation..

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend of mine just asked his insurance company as soon as they said it was a write of if he could buy it back. they only sell them back for scrap value which cost him £180 to buy back a £3000 car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this body repair rip off merchant , has this morning done a quote on my dads car, and suprise suprise ,they have told him that it will be touch and go whether its wrote off,they are sending the quote to the insurers but they will let him know early next week They wouldnt give him a copy of the quote, said the price hadnt been finalised yet. Could see he was a bit traumatised as he doesnt want to lose his motor , not even to buy back from the insurers . I decided to get a second opinion , and took his motor to a more reputable company ,with a reputation of good work at a fair price. The body shop owner did the quote , and no where near the book price of the car. I told him that we had already had a quote and it was touch and go to being a write off, he laughed and said , dont tell me the garage up the road , well known for doing that , this motor can be fixed no problem ,its not a write off, they like to buy motors off insurers , get them fixed and sell them on .He told me to send his quote to the insurer and tell them that he will fix the motor . .....can my dad do this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rox,

 

It's probably a little late now but you do not have to use an authorised garage of your Insurer. The only reason why they send you there is because they will get discounted prices on repairs (or normally would do). If you have a garage which you prefer and normally use then get an alternative quote for repairs from them on headed paper and send it in to your insurer.

What will most likely happen is your dads insurer will say that if you use the unauthorised garage they will raise the excess from £100 to £200. If the Third Partys insurer has admitted liability for this incident then what happens anyway is your insurer will pay for the repairs then use it's subrogation rights against the third party insurer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What will most likely happen is your dads insurer will say that if you use the unauthorised garage they will raise the excess from £100 to £200. Eh??It does happen with windscreen claims, but not a/d. which firm (genuine question, I'm not aware of anyone doing this).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...