Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi @BankFodder I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.  It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. So when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.  Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
    • Hi What they have asked in what you have highlighted isn't unusual at all as Councils have numerous different departments that deal with specific different areas within that council. So if what you are asking in your DSAR is say specific to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Planning Permission etc then just let them know that specific area. On the other hand if you want every bit of DATA they hold on you then simply tell then ALL DATA they hold on you it's them up to then to go through all depts to check for it. 
    • A growing number of couples are booking a content creators to capture their special day.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Adult on child ticket FGW/TPE - ** SETTLED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4365 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I'm 16, will be 17 in the coming weeks. I was caught travelling on a child ticket on the return leg of my journey recently (TOC was First Transpennine Express), and the RPI wouldn't excess my ticket, so I had my name, address, dob, etc taken down in his notebook.

 

He advised that I would receive a letter from the Prosecutions dept.

 

Should I pre-emptively write to the department offering to pay the fare+admin costs or should I await the letter?

 

Also, what region should I be looking at for the total cost with admin fee (just an estimate)? It was approx £28 for the child return, so the adult fare would have been double that.

 

Also, what timeframe should I be awaiting a letter in? I rang the Prosecutions dept yesterday and was told it 'may take 2-3weeks' but I've seen up to 6 months on CAG?

 

As irrelevant as it is, I did genuinely believe that 16 year olds could travel on a child ticket, but I accept it was my fault for not checking and at the first opportunity will offer my unmitigated apologies to FGW(?) for this.

 

I was issued a Zero-Fare excess for the journey and had my ticket retained by the rpi. The reverse of the zero-fare says that the original ticket was kept due to a ticketing irregularity.

 

I can't have a criminal record for my future career, hence why I am keen to ensure this doesn't go to court and I plan to outline this in the letter I send to FGW.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would await the letter to sere what their position is. They will no doubt ask you for an explanation to which you can offer what you have said above. Be as remorseful as you can saying that it was purely down to your ignorance of the age restrictions.

 

If it's you first 'offence', I doubt that they will prosecute.

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do, and yeah it's my first 'offence' and my first run-in with the law.

 

Anyone got any views on: "Also, what region should I be looking at for the total cost with admin fee (just an estimate)? It was approx £28 for the child return, so the adult fare would have been double that.

 

Also, what timeframe should I be awaiting a letter in? I rang the Prosecutions dept yesterday and was told it 'may take 2-3weeks' but I've seen up to 6 months on CAG?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because of your age, it's unlikely you'll be taken to court over this, as TOCs seldon use Youth Courts. If you were 17 a three quarters or above, you could have been summons to attend big boy court, as you would have been 18 by the hearing date. As has been said, awair FTP's letter to see what they intend to do, but it'll more than likely be a slap on the wrist and an administrative penalty, plus the difference in the fare avoided.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think it'll come addressed to me, or "To the parent or guardian of _________" as I have yet to inform the dearest parents as they're on holiday at the moment! :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, I am quite sure you knew what you were doing. The fact you mention being "excessed", which is a fairly specific industry term, implies (to me) that you've had this issue before, but regardless of this, it makes little difference to the end result.

 

If you have purchased the ticket from a self-service ticket machine then it makes it even more likely that you will face some pretty heavy consequences. Additionally, if you initially provided a false DOB or address then it makes it even worse.

 

Firstly, the letter will be addressed to your parent/guardian. In the unlikely event that it isn't, then you must ensure you show your parent or guardian immediately, as an out of court settlement isn't guaranteed, and you may find yourself in court.

 

Secondly, the "amount" to settle out of court is likely to be between £150 and £300. However, as you are a youth, another option could be offered, where you to attend an interview with a prosecutor, with a parent, for a stern talking to, and being given an internal reprimand and probably charged a small admin fee around £50-£75. The TOC is not obliged to offer an out of court settlement, although it is good practice to take steps for an alternative disposal.

 

Finally, your parents may want to review the following:

 

Section 5(3a) of the Regulation of Railways Act 1889

Railway Byelaw 18(1) - derived from S219 - Transport Act 2000

 

You should only find yourself in Youth Court if:

 

1) You did not co-operate fully with the Inspector or conductor at the time of the incident, i.e. false details/ bad attitude.

2) You do not pay the out of court settlement or attend an interview, if offered.

3) You commit a similar offence in the future, or have previously been reported for the offence.

Edited by firstclassx
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, I am quite sure you knew what you were doing. The fact you mention being "excessed", which is a fairly specific industry term, implies (to me) that you've had this issue before, but regardless of this, it makes little difference to the end result.

 

If you have purchased the ticket from a self-service ticket machine then it makes it even more likely that you will face some pretty heavy consequences. Additionally, if you initially provided a false DOB or address then it makes it even worse.

 

Firstly, the letter will be addressed to your parent/guardian. In the unlikely event that it isn't, then you must ensure you show your parent or guardian immediately, as an out of court settlement isn't guaranteed, and you may find yourself in court.

 

Secondly, the "amount" to settle out of court is likely to be between £150 and £300. However, as you are a youth, another option could be offered, where you to attend an interview with a prosecutor, with a parent, for a stern talking to, and being given an internal reprimand and probably charged a small admin fee around £50-£75. The TOC is not obliged to offer an out of court settlement, although it is good practice to take steps for an alternative disposal.

 

Finally, your parents may want to review the following:

 

 

You should only find yourself in Youth Court if:

 

1) You did not co-operate fully with the Inspector or conductor at the time of the incident, i.e. false details/ bad attitude.

2) You do not pay the out of court settlement or attend an interview, if offered.

3) You commit a similar offence in the future, or have previously been reported for the offence.

 

Thanks for your reply,

 

This is my first 'offence', I knew the term excess because a) the RPI issued one to my friend on the same train, and b) I've been researching this (hence how I found CAG train section).

 

I'm not sure if this constitutes bad attitude, but the reason the RPI didn't issue an excess is because when he told me I could 'xs'(as i heard) my ticket I asked him what that meant, he said it meant I could 'xs' it, I again asked the meaning, and he explained and told me he was no longer prepared to issue one. I'm sure it'll be mentioned in the statement, but I (hope) think it wasn't major enough to warrant any additional punitive measure or addition to the settlement if offered.

 

But heyho, no point in worrying anymore, I've started saving, and there's nothing more I can do until the letter arrives.

 

Thanks all for your replies, I shall update when the letter comes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My friend recieved their penalty 2 weeks ago, so I rang the pros dept yesterday. It turned out I wasn't on their system and they had lost my report somewhere in a pile, they found it and set me a letter out 1st class. Letter does not state a specific statue or byelaw, merely 'did not pay the correct fare for the journey made'.

 

The matter has settled with predjudice, to the amount of: the excess of train ticket + admin costs of £20.

 

Sorted.

 

Can a mod edit the thread title to indicate a settlement has been reached please

Edited by johnvic
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Thank you for letting us know, I'll amend your thread title.

 

fwiw, if you want to contact the mods, click on the black triangle on the relevant post. I happened to see this request, but it's faster to let the team know via the triangle.

 

Take care, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...