Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS - PPI Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4365 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All!

 

I have been sending all of the letters to RBS on behalf of my partner. Too cut a long story short I sent an SAR to them requesting the PPI information enclosing the £10 cheque and they returned this fee to me advising that he had been charged £747.00 for PPI on a loan he had with them from August 2003. The loan has been paid off since 2008.

 

On 20th March we completed and sent the FOS questionnaire to them advising why it had been mis-sold. Basically, he didn't even know that he had been paying for it. At the time he took the loan out he was also told by RBS that if he took out an Advantage Gold account he would get a preferential rate for the loan.

 

I do however require help with the following:

 

How long does the RBS have to come back to us with their decision? I have been told 8 weeks but I think I have read somewhere that the FOS has granted them 12 weeks to reply to the fact that they mis-sold this. I would like to be on the ball to chase them regarding this and lodge with the FOS as the 8 weeks is coming to an end.

 

Also, would it be worth going for the Advantage Gold charges if we found out that this account had been mis-sold? Forgive me for being cynical but I don't think it was a preferential rate he had and during this time I think they were on commission to sell these accounts so feel that he may have been led up the garden path on this one!

 

Anyway, any help would be appreciated.

Regards,

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It is 8 weeks for them to respond. The 12 weeks you mention was last year....all back to the normal 8 now.

 

What charges are there in this Advantage Gold account?

 

If they told you he paid £747 how do you know that is correct? Have you got the agreement?

 

You really ought to do your own calculations of what the refund should be. You will need the figures from the agreement to do that and ideally a record of the payments and dates of payment to the loan account.

 

If you haven't got that then a full SAR should get it and in particular add a line that says the SAR is to include copies of all and any agreements you have ever had with them.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims,

 

Thank you for such a quick response! Yes, we did get all of the information from RBS and it confirmed the PPI figure that I found from his old records. I still don't understand why we got this information without paying for it either. To explain about the loan, he just signed all of the paperwork when he took the loan out originally and didn't notice that Loanguard had been added. There was no mention of this when he applied. It wasn't until I was going through old paperwork in January and said to him was he aware of it and he hadn't a clue. I couldn't run my finances like that however.....

 

Anway, according to my paperwork and calculations they added £747.00 to a £3500 loan and because they didn't mention the Loanguard to him when he was signing, never gave him any details about the PPI or asked him about sick pay he was entitled to (he's been an NHS nurse for 15 years with good sick pay entitlement) I do think that they mis-sold this to him. Would this constitute as mis-selling?

 

I have used the simple spreadsheet with 8% for him and this calculates £1271.08 that is owed to him. Would this be the right one to use or should I look at the other one because the interest rate he was charged was more than 8%?

 

I have also checked his bank statements and when he had the Royalties account he was charged £15 per month for benefits that he didn't use apart from the "preferential rate" on his loan. He was charged these from the time he took out the loan until I spotted it in 2008 after the loan had been paid off. I know what rate he was charged for his loan but don't know how good this was compared to what it would be with this Royalties account. I may well just accept these charges and go for the PPI.

 

If there is anything more you would like to add, feel free!

Best wishes,

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You will need to use this spreadsheet

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

The PPI is 17.49% of the total loan (given by 747 / 4247 x 100) and therefore 17.49% of every repayment made was for the PPI part of the loan.

 

List each payment in the spreadsheet giving the date, description and amount. When finished the box at the top right will show you what you should get back. The "Claim to" date should be today.

 

You don't need to worry about the interest rate of the loan because by doing it as a percentage of the total monthly repayment you account for the loan interest as well.

 

And yes if he was NHS employee and the PPI was put on there without knowledge then there are two very valid reasons for a mis-sale.

 

I don't think you will get very far with other account fees myself so I would stick with getting the PPI back on the loan. Cancel the AG account if you wish.

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All,

 

Thank you all so much for your help in this - we received a letter at the end of last week offering us the full amount that was due to us along with a goodwill gesture for the inconvenience caused because we had to chase this up.

 

Hopefully the cheque will be winging it's way to us as I write this but again many thanks. My donation will be paid as soon as I receive the funds.

 

Keep up the good work everyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...