Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

moliver v's Abbey National Mortgage Finance


moliver
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a mortgae with ANMFL back in 1997 which came with cashback of about £7k for which i had to pay 0.75% above their standard variable rate on the whole mortgage for five years or repay the cashback. As I had no intention (hope) of paying back the mortgage in that timescale, there was no issue :)

 

I moved house after a couple of years and simply moved the mortgage to the new property - still no problem

 

At the end of 2000 I was offered a job in Jersey where it wasn't really possible to own a house. Couldn't rent it out for anywhere near the amount of the mortgage and so had to sell and repay the mortgage :?

 

Despite various appeals to Abbey, pointing out that if I didn't sell the house I would default on the mortgage the still stung me for £7,438 Early Repayment Charge :evil:

 

There followed various letters all in the same vein including some extraordinary and banal explanations of how they had lost money, which as I pointed out at the time would mean that they would have lost £38,000 had I redeemed the mortgage after one day - banks are really that silly?????????:eek:

 

Eventually they issued a deadlock letter and pointed me in the direction of the Office Of The Banking Ombudsman - at that point I gave up!

 

The I found this site and have now started again.:p

 

First letter sent 4th July 2006

 

P*** o** letter from Abbbey sent 12th July 2006

 

LBA sent 21st July 2006

 

letter from Abbey 26th July - if you want to take us to court - here is the address for service!

 

MCOL

Claim No 6QZ68236

£7,438 plus £3,400 in interest

Issued 29/09/06

 

Ready for a tough battle!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Moliver,

 

Best of luck with this one. Abbey aren't the most accomodating of companies to deal with. Their latest trick is to threaten to multi -track and tell you their costs are already the same as your claim. Have you pmed a mod the claim no and details?

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoot

 

Thanks for your words of support - if their costs are higher than my claim then I wouldn't want to be a shareholder in Abbey. If the ERC is the same value on day one of the mortgage as it is at the end of five years I just can't see how they can argue a 'genuine pre-estimate'.

 

Haven't pmed a mod - how do i do that?

 

 

Regards

 

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mark,

 

I'll inform the mods. You might like to follow this thread as they are at about the same stage as you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/28447-stef-abbey-mortgages.html

 

and this one which is a little more ahead

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/9207-reclaiming-abbey-mortgage-early.html

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

As expected the stalling has started!

 

They had until tomorrow to acknowledge (18th October)

 

Received in the post today a letter from DLA Piper with a request under Part 18 for further information - basically acoount numebr and address.

 

Does this mean that I cannot apply for judgement for a further 14 days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's over a week since judgement was issued and I've not heard a word from Abbey, their solicitors or the Court - anyone got any advice on how to proceed particularly as the claim is £11k?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't send in the bailiffs until the judgment has actually been granted. I'm not sure how long it takes from issue for them to enter judgment. In my claim against Littlewoods it was only a matter of days.

 

It might be worth phoning the customer services at MCOL and find out what has happened. It may well be that Abbey are disputing the judgment and asking for more time. Don't contact Abbey at this point as it may well alert them to the fact that they need to get the judgment set aside.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

usual trick by Abbey I am afraid.

Spanish Holiday Rental - 10% off BAG and CAG Members

www.rent-in-spain.org.uk

 

 

Progress so far:

 

Yorkshire Bank - LBA 26/07/06 £1001.00 - £500.50 offered and rejected

RBS Credit Card - Settled £200.00

Sainsburys - Settled in full £100.00

JD WIlliams - Settled in full £50.00

Argos Card Services - £98 - offered £60 and rejected.

Abbey Mortgages - MCOL 2nd October - Deadline 21st

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...