Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tenants Have Just Left and I have some Problems...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is my first post (and also new to forums), so please be kind.

 

I've been a landlord for almost two years and my third set of tenants checked out last Friday. Naively, I've never actually check my property in between the other tenants, but did this time. I am so glad that I did. The other times I have, again naively, relied purely on the inventory company's clerk for the inventory and check out, accepting any cleaning, missing stuff, etc that they state.

 

Due to problems, I decided to be far more hands on and so visited the property on Saturday.There are some "simple" problems - stains on a carpet floor and dirty oven that I will raise as an issue, but there are a few problem areas.Upon checking the kitchen, I noticed a huge pile of "rubbish" on a kitchen cupboard. This rubbish turned out to be mail for me, my husband and previous tenants. It states in the contract that all mail for the landlords must be passed on to the rental agent's address. It was not. Is there anything I can do about it? The mail included cheques from the tax office (lucky old me!) ammounting to over £700 for previous tax years. I changed my address on all my banks, etc, but never thought about the tax office! Can I claim any costs in the check out for withholding my mail?

 

The tenants left a lot of stuff behind (plates, glasses, bin, exercise equipment and clothes) and I'm not sure where I stand on some things regarding their property. I fully intend to store their things for the time frame laid out in the contract, however, we put a new toilet seat in the property (on the loo) two weeks into their tenancy in August because the tenants complained it was broken. On check out, my husband has informed me that it is not the seat he put on. As they have left a vast amount of belongings, can I include the toilet seat and charge them for my original? I never gave permission to replace it - probably wouldn't have because how does a seat break within 6 months? I don't want to accept a new seat only to have the tenant claim it as their property after the deposit has been handed back.

 

They have also put up a chin up bar in the hallway which has now marked two walls where the black rubber has moved. Again, I never gave permission for this. The room now needs decorating. It's a cream wallpaper with a border. Are the tenants responsible for the entire room to be painted (not actually that big) because I cannot simply paint two walls? Or just a portion of it?

 

As the kitchen cupboards are still filled with their belongings, can I assume that they can't have cleaned them? There is also food left in the oven which questions the cleanliness.

 

The front door also has two locks; one was jammed and unlockable. My husband fixed it, but for the two days after the tenants left the door was unsecured. Presumably it did not spontaneously happen on check out. Is there any recourse for that?

 

Apologies for the length of the message, but I'm really concerned with the door lock and my mail.

Persephone

Link to post
Share on other sites

as for the damages, and unclean condition, did you take a security deposit? if so did you return it? If not then this is normally used to put the damages right and clean property. I would suspect you have landlords insurance, that again should cover this. as for toilet seat they are £4:99 in argos and the previous tenants will point this out. As for belongings you are correct to store them as per agreement in tenancy but after that then you can dispose of them as you wish (sell them to cover costs). perhaps the toilet seat did break and they replaced if they broke it, I would if it was me. Any work you do keep invoices and these can be shown if tenants dispute your claims.

I would say that you have learnt a lesson get a deposit and dont return it until you have inspected the property.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

To claim for damages or cleaning then you ideally need an acceptable inventory at the beginning and end of the tenancy, or other proof of costs. eg. receipt for the toilet seat should do. (NB a £4.99 seat from Argos would probably break if you had any heavy tenants - I assume the one you put in was of better quality).

 

Seems unlikely you could claim about the post if you have not lost money. As an aside, you should be filling in a tax return with the proceeds of your rental house so the tax office should know your address!

 

Judgement is generally required for redecoration. If it is a small relatively inconspicuous mark it would be hard to justify redecoration. If it is a huge splodge in the middle of the wall then that is OK. With decoration, there is also the matter of betterment. You cannot normally charge the full amount as it is assumed that the property would need redecoration every few years.

 

With the lock and the loo seat they will probably say that they broke as wear and tear and you may struggle to prove otherwise (and they may be truthful).

 

Assuming that the deposit is protected you may have to justify any claims. You may have to negotiate if you want to avoid going through the deposit resolution services.

 

You might consider getting rid of the wall paper. I've got white walls, no wall paper (4 coats of emulsion). Easy to clean and cheap to repaint.

 

I strongly recommend being there for checkin/checkouts and also inspecting the place reasonably regularly. Some tenants feel uncomfortable with inspections but even with perfect tenants, inspections are important for you to ensure you pick up any maintenance issues that tenants can overlook.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without a move in inspection/inventory for current Tenancy, it will be difficult to prove damage was caused by current Ts.

Move out inspection for previous Ts may be acceptable if virtually no gap between Ts.

Are you saying inventory clerk did a move-out inspection for current Ts with which you disagree?

 

It was your resp to get mail redirected by PO, not the Ts resp to forward it, in the same way you have no resp to forward their mail after departure, just return to sender.

 

You need to contact last Ts to come and reclaim their 'belonging' and charge them for storage.

As for cleaning, you have to allow fore fair wear & tear over T period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...